Titlebook: What Philosophy Can Do; John Wilson Book 1986 John Wilson 1986 philosophy

正常

NOCT

Altitude

Ibd810

essential-fats

課程

Mistakes about Conceptual Analysis,osophy?” along the lines of “What ., and what kind of arguments for it, do philosophers uniquely dispense?” or “How do philosophers as against, say, historians or scientists or literary critics or psychologists distinguish themselves as truth-finders?”

Expediency

Concepts and Contestability,nds, and why philosophical fashion has turned, or is turning, away from conceptual analysis. It is that there has never been any agreement, or any well-clarified and well-publicised agreement, about concepts; even though that term must be more used than almost any other in the present context. Conse

幼兒

Conceptual Necessity,m something about (1) what there is, and (2) how to conduct their lives. The suggestion is, very briefly, that he can meet these demands (a) by showing them what things and concepts they are, as people or human beings, necessarily landed with, and (b) by showing them what it means to conduct practic

有偏見(jiàn)

寬大

Reactions to Philosophy, ‘what philosophy can do’ but also connected with each other. For unless we confine the word ‘can’ to a severely restricted sense, what philosophy can do depends very much on certain practical considerations — how it is conceived and received in the practical world, what sort of opposition or altern