Titlebook: Watching the Watchers; Parliament and the I Hugh Bochel,Andrew Defty,Jane Kirkpatrick Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

Wilson

書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Watching the Watchers讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

飛來(lái)飛去真休

New Possibilities: Legislative Oversight of Intelligence beyond Westminster, relation to intelligence and security, perhaps most obviously the work of the temporary committee on Extraordinary Rendition in 2005 and 2006, but also more broadly at other measures of interest such as questions and reports.

Cholesterol

感激小女

Introduction: The Challenges of Legislative Oversight of Intelligence,e on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The dossier had been published earlier that day to coincide with the recall of Parliament to debate policy towards Iraq. As the Butler Inquiry later observed, the so-called September dossier broke new ground by using secret intelligence in a public document in

Commonplace

,‘The Government Does Not Comment…’: Parliament and the Intelligence Services,ntary scrutiny. For most of their 100-year history the intelligence and security agencies operated with relative anonymity and impunity. In the official history of MI5, published to mark the agency’s centenary in 2009, the historian Christopher Andrew observed that until recently the work of British

冒煙

,‘The Government Does Not Comment…’: Parliament and the Intelligence Services,ntary scrutiny. For most of their 100-year history the intelligence and security agencies operated with relative anonymity and impunity. In the official history of MI5, published to mark the agency’s centenary in 2009, the historian Christopher Andrew observed that until recently the work of British

針葉樹(shù)

Managing Continuity and Change: Legislating for Intelligence Agency Accountability,ntal level it also involves the passage of legislation to ensure that the existence and activities of intelligence agencies are grounded in law. As Born and Leigh observe:.Providing intelligence agencies with a democratic mandate not only provides legitimacy, the process of securing parliamentary ap

治愈

obligation

信條

,‘A Unique and Special Committee’: The Intelligence and Security Committee,he ISC operates within the ‘ring of secrecy’ and has therefore for the first time allowed MPs and Peers to have wide-ranging access to the intelligence and security agencies, documents and staff. Moreover, it has also exposed intelligence agency staff to parliamentarians and the democratic process i