Titlebook: Walzer and War; Reading Just and Unj Graham Parsons,Mark A. Wilson Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusi

ominous

書目名稱Walzer and War影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Walzer and War影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Walzer and War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Walzer and War網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Walzer and War被引頻次




書目名稱Walzer and War被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Walzer and War年度引用




書目名稱Walzer and War年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Walzer and War讀者反饋




書目名稱Walzer and War讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

命令變成大炮

HACK

仲裁者

Fresco

預(yù)兆好

Keeping Exceptions Exceptional in War: Could Any Revisionist Theory Guide Action?,hapter is a philosophical argument in favor of leashing philosophical argument in the specific circumstances of armed conflict. The crucial example of a morally required exceptionless rule is: never target civilians. More subtle and theoretically superior rules of the form, never target civilians ex

止痛藥

Autonomy, Obedience, and Manifest Illegality,ely degraded” and thus not generally morally responsible for crimes they carry out. I aim to resist this conclusion without lurching to the other extreme and neglecting the enormous pressures soldiers in combat face. Employing the standard legal excuses, ignorance and duress, shows how soldiers’ cul

Rct393

Peacebuilding and Counterinsurgency: Alternatives to the Moral Dilemma of War,y measures, and commitment to create better options. Parallels will be drawn between religious peacebuilding initiatives and the military policy of counterinsurgency as nonviolent alternatives to the moral dilemmas of war and killing. The fact that such alternatives are regarded as morally obligator

idiopathic

,Walzer’s Soldiers: Gender and the Rights of Combatants,target them in war. This view of soldiers and the military has been endorsed for centuries. However, many theorists struggle to defend it by appeal to standard liberal principles. Instead, theorists such as Grotius, Hobbes, Pufendorf, and Vattel appeal directly to gender norms, particularly the norm

蝕刻術(shù)