Titlebook: Wallace Stevens and Martin Heidegger; Poetry as Appropriat Ian Tan Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusi

Promotion

傻

斜

,“Not Ours Although We Understood”: The Language of Stevens and Heidegger,grounds beings in a non-metaphysical way. It justifies the overall theoretical and analytical strategy of the book, while highlighting important gaps in a tradition of Stevensian scholarship that can be supplemented through a phenomenological-hermeneutical perspective that I provide.

必死

,Conclusion: The Task of the Heideggerian Critic and the Adventure of Poetry’s Being,r of outlining a theory and practice of reading which allows the “otherness” of the text to appropriate readerly significance. In this way, the logic of interpreting disruption in the Stevensian text is convincingly mapped onto the event of . as encounter between subjectivity and the language of Being.

邊緣

結(jié)合

,Stevens’ Supreme Fiction and the Location of Truth as/in Philosophy,anity and community. I will centre in on a detailed reading of Stevens’ long poem so as to foreground the centrality of concepts such as “abstraction”, “firstness” and the “image without image” germane both to the poem and to Stevens’ entire poetic pursuit. Moving criticism of the poem away from dec

DOTE

patriarch

preservative

決定性

Ian Tanther supported by evidence from an online third-party dictator game in which each decision-maker had to redistribute money between two other participants. It varied whether those participants were above or below a specific needs threshold and whether a transfer would reverse ranks or not. The result