Titlebook: époque émilienne; Philosophy and Scien Ruth Edith Hagengruber Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

Sciatica

978-3-030-89923-3The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl

overweight

代理人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92213-8process of the rehabilitation of the hypotheses following the age of Newton, which was characterized by the polemic against Descartes’ “esprit de système” and by a strictly inductive interpretation of the scientific method. The oblivion into which the methodology of the . fell is somewhat paradoxica

Introvert

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92213-8s he was able to retrace our cognition to the origin of phenomena instead of delivering a “merely logical deduction”. Eberhard holds that there was nothing new, but all delivered in Leibniz and Wolff; to prove his claim he refers to a quote from Du Chatelet, taken from a paragraph where she determin

intrude

SOBER

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92617-4I argue that Du Chatelet advances Leibniz’s concept of time by explaining how we form the idea of time in our mind and how time as an ideal being relates to succession in real beings. I show that Du Chatelet, differently to Kant, recognizes the dependency of time in its constitution on succession in

choleretic

Recessive

Fretful

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92622-8igm emerged as a counterargument to the Cartesian tradition of philosophy and science (Leibniz included), and it was first restricted to the English islands. In the beginning of the eighteenth century, Newtonians were also spoken of on the European continent, among them Pierre Louis Moreau de Mauper

medium

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93285-4e emphasized the importance of causality to Du Chatelet’s .. Others, such as Stan (2019), have argued for a strong Wolffian influence on the latter, challenging the “received” narrative that reads Du Chatelet as a Leibnizian. In this paper, I will trace Du Chatelet’s conception of causality back to