找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: ‘Brave New World‘: Contexts and Legacies; Jonathan Greenberg,Nathan Waddell Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 方言
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 06:23:03 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:37:00 | 只看該作者
Front Matterded in collective agency, attachments, and interests’ (Krieger, 1999, p. 19).. It argues that New Labour has not abandoned the attempt to construct political subjects, as its politics both presupposes the existence of bonds of community and seeks to strengthen them. This is, in fact, the core of Bla
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:40:40 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 18:08:58 | 只看該作者
, as a Modern Utopia,orities in many places have used as a means for a smooth transition from a conflictual past to reconciliation. This chapter analyzes transitional justice and how this has been understood and perceived in discourse in Albania. Albania is one of the countries that went through the harshest communism,
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:44:29 | 只看該作者
,‘That Learning Were Such a Filthy Thing’: Education, Literacy and Social Control in Huxley’s ,,ial practices. Interest in classroom discourse analysis has grown with an enhanced understanding of the mediating role of talk in learning as a high-level mental activity (see review by Green and Dixon). From a sociocultural point of view, a person’s speech is a marker of identity. The interweaving
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:05:34 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:11:51 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:42:07 | 只看該作者
What Huxley Got Wrong,and cultural theory making ‘discourse’ available as an explanatory concept. At its most general, the argument was that social and cultural life is invested with meaning and value by regular symbolic representations. Discourse, in Foucault’s sense, could be seen to act as a predisposing mechanism and
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:58:40 | 只看該作者
,, and ,: A ‘Draught that Will Make You […] Lighthearted and Gay’,ew and thus question not only the existing set of rules of discourse but also the traditional structure of society. Based on these observations and following Foucault’s (Die Ordnung des Diskurses: Inauguralvorlesung am Collège de France, 2. Dezember 1970 (W. Seitter, Trans.). In: Foucault M, Die Ord
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:49:27 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 21:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
名山县| 余干县| 金坛市| 阿城市| 化州市| 本溪| 莱西市| 镇赉县| 云阳县| 沭阳县| 阿拉善盟| 青河县| 昆明市| 梨树县| 通海县| 德州市| 内丘县| 武隆县| 雷州市| 南雄市| 西畴县| 滦南县| 余姚市| 云阳县| 南丹县| 柯坪县| 辽宁省| 罗山县| 赫章县| 沁水县| 滨海县| 广丰县| 道孚县| 柞水县| 阿合奇县| 峡江县| 中方县| 白水县| 周至县| 娱乐| 共和县|