標題: Titlebook: Logic and Argumentation; Third International Mehdi Dastani,Huimin Dong,Leon van der Torre Conference proceedings 2020 Springer Nature Swit [打印本頁] 作者: 粘上 時間: 2025-3-21 16:37
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation網絡公開度
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation被引頻次
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation年度引用
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation讀者反饋
書目名稱Logic and Argumentation讀者反饋學科排名
作者: incubus 時間: 2025-3-21 20:15
Group Beliefit does not satisfy the D axiom). In the literature there is no detailed completeness proof for axiomatizations of KD45 with distributed belief that we are aware of, and there has been some confusion regarding soundness of such axiomatizations related to the mentioned lack of preservation. In this p作者: 重畫只能放棄 時間: 2025-3-22 04:11 作者: 忙碌 時間: 2025-3-22 08:24 作者: cavity 時間: 2025-3-22 08:57
Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scalesfferent ways. Among them, the labelling-based approach allows for a concise and flexible determination of acceptability statuses of arguments through assignment of a label indicating acceptance, rejection, or undecided to each argument. In this work, we contemplate a way of broadening it by accommod作者: orthodox 時間: 2025-3-22 16:15 作者: 有特色 時間: 2025-3-22 18:19
Logic Programming, Argumentation and?Human Reasoningtion of abstract argumentation in the 1990s, connections between argumentation semantics and logic programming semantics have been studied, but existing work on this connection has not yet covered the weak completion semantics. In this paper we define a novel translation from logic programs to abstr作者: MOT 時間: 2025-3-22 23:12 作者: 代替 時間: 2025-3-23 03:14 作者: Indict 時間: 2025-3-23 05:36 作者: Pruritus 時間: 2025-3-23 13:44
Towards an Executable Methodology for the Formalization of Legal Textsation environment for legal texts. The ability of the tool to execute queries is used in order to drive a correct formalization until all queries are validated. The approach is studied on a fragment of the . of the Scottish Parliament.作者: Insubordinate 時間: 2025-3-23 17:56
Goal-Driven Structured Argumentation for Patient Management in a Multimorbidity Settingto different patient-centric goals. Reasoning in this setting carries a complexity related to the multiple variables involved. These variables reflect the co-existing health conditions that should be considered when defining a proper therapy. However, current Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs作者: ALB 時間: 2025-3-23 21:11
Intuitionistic-Bayesian Semantics of?First-Order Logic for Genericsrobabilistic account of generics. Leslie (2007, 2008) points out the three shortcomings of Cohen’s theory. Asher and Pelletier (2013) point out five more shortcomings of Cohen’s theory. The aim of this paper is to propose a new version of logic for generics—First-Order Logic for Generics (.)—that ca作者: entitle 時間: 2025-3-24 02:04
Ambiguity Preference and Context Learning in Uncertain Signalingiguous words in natural language warrants explanation. We justify the existence of ambiguity from the perspective of the context dependence. The main contribution of the paper is that we constructed a context learning process such that the interlocutors can infer opponent’s private belief from the c作者: Crater 時間: 2025-3-24 02:53 作者: Libido 時間: 2025-3-24 06:51
Preservation of Admissibility with Rationality and Feasibility Constraintsse between several input extensions of abstract argumentation framework, each provided by a different individual. To achieve this, we introduce the concept of concrete admissibility for abstract argumentations by strengthening Dung’s admissibility. We also define a model for extension aggregation th作者: 他姓手中拿著 時間: 2025-3-24 11:48
Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes: Negative Consequences and Basic Slippery Slopeppery Slope Argument” proposed by Douglas Walton. This work envisages two new kinds of uncertainty that should be taken into account, one related to time and one related to the material relation between premises and conclusion. Furthermore, it is argued that some modifications to the structure of th作者: 神刊 時間: 2025-3-24 16:59 作者: Curmudgeon 時間: 2025-3-24 20:07 作者: 坦白 時間: 2025-3-24 23:55 作者: 橫條 時間: 2025-3-25 06:22
0302-9743 u, China, in April 2020. The 14 full and 7 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 31 submissions. The papers cover the focus of the CLAR series, including formal models of argumentation, logics for decision making and uncertainreasoning, formal models of evidence, con rmati作者: 好忠告人 時間: 2025-3-25 10:14 作者: prolate 時間: 2025-3-25 15:38
Computer-Supported Analysis of Arguments in Climate Engineering”; these arguments point out uncertainties in future deployment of CE technologies. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate and explain the application of higher-order interactive and automated theorem proving (utilizing shallow semantical embeddings) to the logical analysis of “real-life” argumentative discourse.作者: Adulterate 時間: 2025-3-25 16:14
Ambiguity Preference and Context Learning in Uncertain Signalingonversation. A sufficient condition is proved to show if the learning can be successful. Furthermore, we investigate when the learning fails, how the interlocutors choose among degrees of ambiguous expressions through an adaptive learning.作者: anniversary 時間: 2025-3-25 20:48
Preservation of Admissibility with Rationality and Feasibility Constraintsat clearly separates the constraint supposed to be satisfied by individuals and the constraint that must be met by the collective decision. Using this model, we show that the majority rule guarantees admissible sets on newly defined admissible sets.作者: 完成才會征服 時間: 2025-3-26 03:40
Uncertainty in Argumentation Schemes: Negative Consequences and Basic Slippery Slopeese Argumentation Schemes or to their Critical Questions could facilitate the process of Knowledge Extraction and modeling from these two argumentative patterns. For example, the study suggests to change the premises of the Basic Slippery Slope related to the Control and the Loss of Control.作者: intertwine 時間: 2025-3-26 05:23 作者: maladorit 時間: 2025-3-26 11:05
0302-9743 on, and justi cation, logics forgroup cognition and social network, reasoning about norms, formal representationsof natural language and legal texts, as well as applications of argumentationon climate engineering..978-3-030-44637-6978-3-030-44638-3Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: fibula 時間: 2025-3-26 13:22 作者: thalamus 時間: 2025-3-26 19:20 作者: 一回合 時間: 2025-3-26 23:16 作者: 墊子 時間: 2025-3-27 04:04
Intuitionistic-Bayesian Semantics of?First-Order Logic for Genericsore shortcomings of Cohen’s theory. The aim of this paper is to propose a new version of logic for generics—First-Order Logic for Generics (.)—that can overcome all of the eight shortcomings. To accomplish this goal, we provide the language of . with an intuitionistic-Bayesian semantics.作者: Accrue 時間: 2025-3-27 05:24 作者: concentrate 時間: 2025-3-27 09:34
978-3-030-44637-6Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020作者: 尖叫 時間: 2025-3-27 14:54 作者: 鞏固 時間: 2025-3-27 19:01 作者: invade 時間: 2025-3-27 21:57 作者: 自愛 時間: 2025-3-28 05:46
Reasoning About Degrees of ConfirmationWe present a probabilistic logic for reasoning about degrees of confirmation. We provide a sound and strongly complete axiomatization for the logic. We show that the problem of deciding satisfiability is in PSPACE.作者: 1分開 時間: 2025-3-28 09:19 作者: monologue 時間: 2025-3-28 11:30
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/587952.jpg作者: 積極詞匯 時間: 2025-3-28 17:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3argumentation; artificial intelligence; autonomous agents; computer programming; computer science; comput作者: Alienated 時間: 2025-3-28 20:12
6樓作者: gnarled 時間: 2025-3-29 01:15
6樓作者: RAG 時間: 2025-3-29 03:21
7樓作者: HAIRY 時間: 2025-3-29 08:30
7樓作者: 倔強不能 時間: 2025-3-29 15:08
7樓作者: 彎腰 時間: 2025-3-29 16:41
7樓作者: Nerve-Block 時間: 2025-3-29 22:09
8樓作者: 歌劇等 時間: 2025-3-30 02:37
8樓作者: Aura231 時間: 2025-3-30 07:55
8樓作者: MUTE 時間: 2025-3-30 08:39
8樓作者: cruise 時間: 2025-3-30 15:15
9樓作者: defenses 時間: 2025-3-30 17:47
9樓作者: Control-Group 時間: 2025-3-30 22:37
9樓作者: 食料 時間: 2025-3-31 03:37
9樓作者: HARD 時間: 2025-3-31 06:43
10樓作者: GEON 時間: 2025-3-31 10:44
10樓作者: 人造 時間: 2025-3-31 16:00
10樓作者: Pruritus 時間: 2025-3-31 20:07
10樓
