標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs; Joseph C. Schmid,Daniel J. Linford Book 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 logic [打印本頁] 作者: foresight 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:59
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs被引頻次
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs年度引用
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs讀者反饋
書目名稱Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: COKE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:18 作者: Fierce 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:39
K. Schauenstein,R. Pfeilschifter,G. Wick, the chapter is relevant not only to the Aristotelian proof but also to the gap problem for persistence arguments more generally, as we also articulate a naturalist-friendly account of the nature of a necessarily existent, timeless foundation of reality. The account is based on recent work in the philosophy of physics on wavefunction monism.作者: PANT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:21
Function, Phylogeny, and Fossilsgue that the Neo-Platonic proof fails to deliver the mindedness of the absolutely simple being and actually militates against its mindedness. Finally, we uncover tensions between Christian doctrines and the Neo-Platonic proof.作者: Angioplasty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:51
Stage One of the Aristotelian Proof,everal defeaters afflict premise (7) of Feser’s argument. Next, we propose a new necessary condition for per se chains, arguing that our proposal provides an undercutting defeater for the argument. Finally, we argue that Feser’s inference from . actualizer to . actualizer is a non-sequitur on multiple fronts.作者: 愛哭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:37 作者: 愛哭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:52 作者: 懶鬼才會(huì)衰弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:07 作者: legacy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:04
Book 2023defends new arguments against classical theism. The authors engage the following classical theistic proofs: Aquinas’s First Way, Aquinas’s .De Ente. argument, and Feser’s Aristotelian, Neo-Platonic, Augustinian, Thomistic, and Rationalist proofs.? The authors also provide the first systematic treatm作者: Aviary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:36 作者: angiography 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:38 作者: 干涉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-7895-1counts of inertial persistence. We then articulate our existential inertia thesis using our answers to these taxonomic questions. Finally, in hopes of providing a foundation and jumping-off point for further research on existential inertia, we list each taxonomic question in the concluding section.作者: FIN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:11
Joseph M Masserano,Norman Weinerrsistence on which temporal things (or some subset thereof) persist without external sustenance or conservation unless and until they are positively destroyed. Such accounts include tendency-disposition accounts, transtemporal accounts, law-based accounts, necessity accounts, and no-change accounts.作者: 負(fù)擔(dān) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:35
,Aquinas’s First Way,f certain interpretations of the conclusion and premises. But such interpretations are found either to be unmotivated or to lend little to no support to classical theism. We also uncover at least six non-sequiturs afflicting the First Way. We conclude by addressing objections to our critical appraisal.作者: 得意牛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:26
Existential Inertia: Thesis and Taxonomy,counts of inertial persistence. We then articulate our existential inertia thesis using our answers to these taxonomic questions. Finally, in hopes of providing a foundation and jumping-off point for further research on existential inertia, we list each taxonomic question in the concluding section.作者: 債務(wù) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:15
The Metaphysics of Existential Inertia,rsistence on which temporal things (or some subset thereof) persist without external sustenance or conservation unless and until they are positively destroyed. Such accounts include tendency-disposition accounts, transtemporal accounts, law-based accounts, necessity accounts, and no-change accounts.作者: CLAP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:25 作者: Embolic-Stroke 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:16 作者: FACET 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:16
Stage One of the Aristotelian Proof,ing. The proof is divided into two stages. Stage one seeks to demonstrate the existence of a purely actual, unactualized actualizer, while stage two identifies this unactualized actualizer with God. Our purpose in this chapter is to critically assess the argument’s first stage. We first argue that s作者: 擦掉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:54 作者: Exposition 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:15
Existential Inertia: Thesis and Taxonomy,to taxonomize inertial theses. This includes questions about scope, relativity theory, modal register, dependence and destruction, and metaphysical accounts of inertial persistence. We then articulate our existential inertia thesis using our answers to these taxonomic questions. Finally, in hopes of作者: 無法取消 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:06
The Metaphysics of Existential Inertia,hings persist at all. The purpose of this chapter is to redress this lack of research. More specifically, we develop and categorize explanations of persistence on which temporal things (or some subset thereof) persist without external sustenance or conservation unless and until they are positively d作者: 貧窮地活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:49 作者: MAUVE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:52
Mind the Gap,imelessness, perfection, uniqueness, goodness, omnipotence, intelligence, omniscience, freedom, and immateriality. We also argue that the failure of the Aristotelian proof’s second stage entails the failure of the second stages of the other classical theistic proofs we consider in our book. Moreover作者: neoplasm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:54 作者: cushion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:14 作者: 破布 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:49
The Thomistic and Rationalist Proofs, something in which essence and existence are identical. The Rationalist proof reasons from the reality of contingent beings to the existence of a purely actual, necessary being. Drawing on the resources of previous chapters, we argue that both proofs fail.作者: 不溶解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:08 作者: 壓迫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:41
Book 2023ofs. Finally, they defend new arguments against. .classical theism based on abstract objects and changing divine knowledge. The text appeals to students, researchers, and others interested in classical theistic proofs, the existence and nature of God, and the ultimate explanations of persistence, change, and contingency..作者: STERN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:52
In Memoriam Prof. Werner Seubertlar importance is the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity (DDS) and its understanding of parthood. After explaining both DDS and its attendant conception of parthood in detail, we explain the notions of intrinsicality and extrinsicality and explore the dialectical context of classical theistic proofs.作者: 我說不重要 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:38 作者: Osmosis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:41
SpringerBriefs in Molecular Sciencely existent, purely actual intellect in which abstract objects reside as thoughts or concepts. Here we argue that this proof fails. We also develop new arguments against classical theism based on the reality of abstract objects. Finally, we examine arguments for and against theistic conceptualism.作者: aspersion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:32
Function / Architecture Optimizations something in which essence and existence are identical. The Rationalist proof reasons from the reality of contingent beings to the existence of a purely actual, necessary being. Drawing on the resources of previous chapters, we argue that both proofs fail.作者: Excitotoxin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:25
Introduction,lar importance is the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity (DDS) and its understanding of parthood. After explaining both DDS and its attendant conception of parthood in detail, we explain the notions of intrinsicality and extrinsicality and explore the dialectical context of classical theistic proofs.作者: 內(nèi)行 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:55
Existential Inertia and the Aristotelian Causal Principle,bjects persist in the absence of both external sustenance and sufficiently destructive factors. We also show how this entailment defeats the Aristotelian proof’s demand for a sustaining cause keeping objects in being.作者: Neuralgia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:23 作者: Synchronism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:58 作者: Custodian 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:49
Joseph C. Schmid,Daniel J. LinfordFills a gap in recent scholarship on proofs of God‘s existence.Represents a unique contribution to metaphysics, philosophy of time, and philosophy of religion.Written in a style that is accessible and作者: 縫紉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:46
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318563.jpg作者: ordain 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:46
Dual Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsWe first offer an informal summary of our book’s findings and conclude with a formal summary and outline thereof.作者: Fraudulent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:03 作者: incite 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:19 作者: dysphagia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:22
In Memoriam Prof. Werner Seubertlar importance is the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity (DDS) and its understanding of parthood. After explaining both DDS and its attendant conception of parthood in detail, we explain the notions of intrinsicality and extrinsicality and explore the dialectical context of classical theistic proofs.作者: Offensive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:59
Semantic Correlations and Syntactic Featuresry formulation of Aquinas’s First Way. We argue, first, that the validity of Aquinas’s First Way, at least so formulated, is preserved only in light of certain interpretations of the conclusion and premises. But such interpretations are found either to be unmotivated or to lend little to no support 作者: 感染 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6925-4ing. The proof is divided into two stages. Stage one seeks to demonstrate the existence of a purely actual, unactualized actualizer, while stage two identifies this unactualized actualizer with God. Our purpose in this chapter is to critically assess the argument’s first stage. We first argue that s作者: 拍翅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0955-0bjects persist in the absence of both external sustenance and sufficiently destructive factors. We also show how this entailment defeats the Aristotelian proof’s demand for a sustaining cause keeping objects in being.作者: 顯示 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:45 作者: 越自我 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:30
Joseph M Masserano,Norman Weinerhings persist at all. The purpose of this chapter is to redress this lack of research. More specifically, we develop and categorize explanations of persistence on which temporal things (or some subset thereof) persist without external sustenance or conservation unless and until they are positively d
