標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education; Mansoor Niaz Book 2018 Springer Inter [打印本頁] 作者: SPIR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:02
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education被引頻次
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education年度引用
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education讀者反饋
書目名稱Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: libertine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:03 作者: NOMAD 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-9900-9nd Galison (2007) constructed the evolving nature of scientific judgment (objectivity) through the following phases: truth-to-nature (eighteenth century), mechanical objectivity (nineteenth century), structural objectivity (late nineteenth century), and finally trained judgment (twentieth century). 作者: cumulative 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0085979d logic, namely structural objectivity. Structures could be communicated to all minds across time and space and hence helped to break the hold of individual subjectivity. Just like structural objectivity, trained judgment was another response to the limitations of the empirical images and photograph作者: 演繹 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:41
Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties,= 5, Level II = 56, Level III = 58, Level IV = 10, and Level V = 2. Only 9% (12 out of 131) of the articles were considered to have an understanding of objectivity that approximated to its historical evolution. Four articles referred to the work of Daston and Galison on objectivity and only one ment作者: lacrimal-gland 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:08
Laura Mazzoli Smith,Jim Campbellity can be replaced by notions of credibility, transferability, dependability, and triangulation of data sources (Level III). In order to facilitate objectivity and researcher independence it is generally recommended in educational research that the researchers must maintain a distance between thems作者: lacrimal-gland 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:49 作者: bioavailability 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:12 作者: 易達(dá)到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:42 作者: 過度 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:22 作者: NICE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:37 作者: NATTY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:26 作者: ERUPT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:44 作者: LUMEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:43 作者: fodlder 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:49 作者: Water-Brash 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:35 作者: Mere僅僅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:35
Conclusion: Understanding the Elusive Nature of Objectivity,scientific practice is a myth, it still remains a powerful and useful idea. It seems that more work needs to be done in order to facilitate a transition toward a more nuanced understanding of objectivity and eventually the dynamics of scientific progress.作者: 騙子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:14 作者: yohimbine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:52
Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education978-3-319-67726-2Series ISSN 1878-0482 Series E-ISSN 1878-0784 作者: judicial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:04
Mansoor NiazShows how transgression of objectivity helps to understand how scientific progress is at a crossroads.Accounts how the science education community conceptualizes objectivity.Explores how objectivity a作者: 老巫婆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:58
Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Educationhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318113.jpg作者: 曲解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:58 作者: 過去分詞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0085979ity) in the history of science as suggested by Daston and Galison (.). Scientists who followed truth-to-nature were looking for the idea in the observation and not the raw observation itself. For example, the procedures for describing, depicting, and classifying plants were openly selective. Later, 作者: Kidney-Failure 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:56 作者: 褲子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:49 作者: 諷刺滑稽戲劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:33 作者: consolidate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:47 作者: Albumin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:23 作者: SHOCK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67726-2Philosophy of science; evolution of objectivity; Transgression of objectivity; objectivity in the histo作者: 節(jié)約 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:36 作者: 手術(shù)刀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:54
Book 2018d that objectivity, certainty, truth, universality, the scientific method and the accumulation of experimental data characterize both science and science education. Such universal values associated with science may be challenged while studying controversies in their original historical context. The 作者: CANE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:28
Introduction: Understanding Objectivity within a Historical Perspective,imental facts. History of science, however, shows that this inductivist stance is at best a fantasy. Objectivity consists in the willingness to abandon a set of preferences when faced with contrary evidence. Although objectivity is not synonymous with truth or certainty, it is often used as a synony作者: 全國性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:21 作者: 宇宙你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:12
Understanding Objectivity in Research Reported in the Journal , (Springer), classified according to the following criteria: Level I, traditional understanding of objectivity as found in science textbooks and positivist philosophers of science; Level II, a simple mention of objectivity as an academic/literary objective; Level III, problematic nature of objectivity is recogn作者: 輕快帶來危險(xiǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:21
Understanding Objectivity in Research Reported in the , (Wiley-Blackwell), classified according to the following criteria: Levels I–V (same as presented in Chap. .). Results obtained showed the following distribution of the 110 articles evaluated: Level I = 4, Level II = 33, Level III = 68, Level IV = 5, and Level V = none. Only 5% (5 out of 110) of the articles were cons作者: debunk 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:09 作者: SPECT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:54
Science at a Crossroads: Transgression Versus Objectivity, (STM) and Atomic force microscope (AFM) for chemical research (nanotechnology) and how these are presented in general chemistry textbooks. In order to understand scientific progress, Roald Hoffmann (.), Nobel Laureate in chemistry, invokes the idea of “transgression of categorization” and Daston an作者: ULCER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:20
Conclusion: Understanding the Elusive Nature of Objectivity, such as certainty, value neutral observations, facts, infallibility, and truth of scientific theories and laws. These results provide a detailed account (over a period of almost 25 years) of how the science education research community conceptualizes the difficulties involved in accepting objectivi作者: TIA742 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:06 作者: encyclopedia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 12:00
