標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Everyday Friendships; Intimacy as Freedom Harry Blatterer Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015 Fr [打印本頁] 作者: 氣泡 時間: 2025-3-21 16:31
書目名稱Everyday Friendships影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Everyday Friendships影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Everyday Friendships網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Everyday Friendships網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Everyday Friendships被引頻次
書目名稱Everyday Friendships被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Everyday Friendships年度引用
書目名稱Everyday Friendships年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Everyday Friendships讀者反饋
書目名稱Everyday Friendships讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 偽善 時間: 2025-3-21 23:52 作者: CAND 時間: 2025-3-22 03:40 作者: bisphosphonate 時間: 2025-3-22 07:12 作者: 冥界三河 時間: 2025-3-22 10:28
Jan Korner,Helmut Lill,Christoph Jostenopes to give some clues about how that freedom is constructed by friends and with what consequences. Beginning with describing friendship as delivering a sense of ‘home’ under conditions of modernity, I turn to the question of how friendship contributes to the making of selves. This question starts 作者: 神秘 時間: 2025-3-22 14:02 作者: 神秘 時間: 2025-3-22 19:53 作者: nutrients 時間: 2025-3-22 23:07 作者: 容易懂得 時間: 2025-3-23 03:10
978-1-349-32330-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015作者: Celiac-Plexus 時間: 2025-3-23 08:00 作者: LAVE 時間: 2025-3-23 13:05 作者: 舉止粗野的人 時間: 2025-3-23 14:21
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137316400Freedom; Friendship; Friends; Gender; Honneth; Intimacy; Kracauer; Love; Modernity; Personal life; Privacy; Rec作者: 會議 時間: 2025-3-23 21:56
Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Lifehttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/317475.jpg作者: Microgram 時間: 2025-3-23 23:14 作者: 褻瀆 時間: 2025-3-24 05:10
2731-6440 ly unclear. It shows that the analysis of the ‘small world‘ of dyads can give important clues about society and its gendered makeup.978-1-349-32330-2978-1-137-31640-0Series ISSN 2731-6440 Series E-ISSN 2731-6459 作者: 難管 時間: 2025-3-24 08:22
Ursachen der Fremdenfeindlichkeit the sociological conception; it refers to the legal formalization of an intimate relationship that is conferred public recognition by way of religious or civic ritual, and the legal attribution of shared rights and obligations. But sociological perspectives on institutions go further; they incorporate, but also elaborate, everyday discourse.作者: 細(xì)查 時間: 2025-3-24 14:45
Love, Friendship, and Freedom, the sociological conception; it refers to the legal formalization of an intimate relationship that is conferred public recognition by way of religious or civic ritual, and the legal attribution of shared rights and obligations. But sociological perspectives on institutions go further; they incorporate, but also elaborate, everyday discourse.作者: 填料 時間: 2025-3-24 18:29 作者: ITCH 時間: 2025-3-24 19:32 作者: ingestion 時間: 2025-3-24 23:17 作者: Vulnerary 時間: 2025-3-25 05:40 作者: rheumatism 時間: 2025-3-25 08:43
Friendship, Intimacy, and the Self,opes to give some clues about how that freedom is constructed by friends and with what consequences. Beginning with describing friendship as delivering a sense of ‘home’ under conditions of modernity, I turn to the question of how friendship contributes to the making of selves. This question starts 作者: Wordlist 時間: 2025-3-25 14:42
Gender and the Love-Friendship Paradox,n the preceding chapters elaborated what others too have suggested: that of all interpersonal relationships friendship provides us with extensive relational freedom of interaction, with all the generative potential that entails. But I have also intimated that this freedom isn’t total, because of fri作者: faultfinder 時間: 2025-3-25 17:16
The Love-Friendship Paradox and Cross-Sex Friendship, reference to cross-sex friendship. While we might assume that today intimate relationships are free from social convention, that turns out to be true for cross-sex friendship only to a limited extent. The social construction of different types of intimacy for men and women, and the norm of sexual a作者: 主講人 時間: 2025-3-25 21:35 作者: 厚臉皮 時間: 2025-3-26 02:20
Introduction,(Nedelmann, 1991, my translation). To say that friendship is underrepresented in sociology is to acknowledge that there . work on the topic. This book, after all, draws liberally on existing research, old and new. It is, however, still relatively marginal in the discipline, especially concerning fri作者: Conserve 時間: 2025-3-26 07:52
Modernity, Intimacy, and Friendship,nking. Scholars have argued that this commonly reiterated interpretation misses the highly instrumental approach to intimacy taken by the Scots, and especially by Smith. I argue instead that early Romanticism is key to the meaning of intimacy in the modern sense; that the Romantics’ often exaggerate作者: conscience 時間: 2025-3-26 12:07 作者: receptors 時間: 2025-3-26 16:15
Friendship, Intimacy, and the Self,would not be ourselves’ (Bollas cited in Craib, 1998, p. 10). These areas butt up against the disciplinary boundaries of sociology, and I certainly cannot pretend to have expertise in them. What I can do, however, is emphasize that our humanness cannot be divorced from our sociality. In this chapter作者: Enervate 時間: 2025-3-26 20:42
Gender and the Love-Friendship Paradox,ut friendship’s embeddedness also means that it is constrained. For one, it is semantically ‘constrained’ to the extent that we partake in the collective construction and reconstruction of its meanings. Thus there is the constraint to interact like friends, and not like lovers or parents and childre作者: 果仁 時間: 2025-3-26 22:06
The Love-Friendship Paradox and Cross-Sex Friendship,concile sex and friendship without partaking in the cultural staging of romance, but without having to forgo to generative potentials of intimacy. The reality of heteronormative barriers regarding what is ostensibly the ‘freest’ of all interpersonal relationships yields insights into the gendered di作者: 安慰 時間: 2025-3-27 01:17
,Conclusion: Friendship’s Embedded Freedom, delivers its basic conditions; it holds us and frees us in holding us. Without its hold we fall, while the exercise of power constricts it, strangling freedoms large and small. The kind of freedom friendship can deliver is the freedom to be yourself. Not despite others, but because of them. Not bec作者: 說不出 時間: 2025-3-27 08:37 作者: 鎮(zhèn)痛劑 時間: 2025-3-27 13:04
Tierische Gebarenslehre und Tierpsychologie,nking. Scholars have argued that this commonly reiterated interpretation misses the highly instrumental approach to intimacy taken by the Scots, and especially by Smith. I argue instead that early Romanticism is key to the meaning of intimacy in the modern sense; that the Romantics’ often exaggerate作者: 語言學(xué) 時間: 2025-3-27 15:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62991-8 on the social scene whose behavior the scientist observes and tries to explain’ (Schutz, 1973, p. 6, my emphasis). Social scientists not only describe common words in their own terms, but also seek to understand the patterns of behaviors, practices, and attitudes they denote. Moreover, as Anthony G作者: ALOFT 時間: 2025-3-27 19:23
Jan Korner,Helmut Lill,Christoph Jostenwould not be ourselves’ (Bollas cited in Craib, 1998, p. 10). These areas butt up against the disciplinary boundaries of sociology, and I certainly cannot pretend to have expertise in them. What I can do, however, is emphasize that our humanness cannot be divorced from our sociality. In this chapter作者: 恃強(qiáng)凌弱的人 時間: 2025-3-28 01:16 作者: GNAT 時間: 2025-3-28 04:21
Ji?í Chaloupka,Dominik Munzar,Josef Humlí?ekconcile sex and friendship without partaking in the cultural staging of romance, but without having to forgo to generative potentials of intimacy. The reality of heteronormative barriers regarding what is ostensibly the ‘freest’ of all interpersonal relationships yields insights into the gendered di作者: 水獺 時間: 2025-3-28 07:57 作者: 宴會 時間: 2025-3-28 11:11
H. Robinsonbryogenesis. The genes for these structural RNAs are not characteristic of any tissue; they are genes controlling “housekeeping” products found in all cells and should be regulated differently from genes which are expressed in a single cell-type such as globin, immunoglobulin and silk fibroin genes.作者: 雪白 時間: 2025-3-28 18:25
Oper und Politik,the patient should be accomplished. A thorough speech, feeding, audiological, dental, orthodontic, and psychological review is a necessary part of the work-up for a patient undergoing alveolar cleft bone grafting. All options, including no treatment, should be considered along with the burden of car作者: 包租車船 時間: 2025-3-28 21:51
D. C. Fromm Greenwood is a Professor Emerita in the Department of Mathematics at the University of British Columbia. Dr. Lawrence M. Ward is a Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Brain Research Centre at the University of British Columbia..978-3-319-26909-2978-3-319-26911-5作者: PATRI 時間: 2025-3-29 02:44 作者: 寬敞 時間: 2025-3-29 04:00
Reisebeschreibungen von deutschen Beamten und Kriegsleuten im Dienst der Niederl?ndischen West- und http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/826008.jpg作者: 下船 時間: 2025-3-29 09:56
