標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Equality in International Society; A Reappraisal Ronnie Hjorth Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 201 [打印本頁] 作者: Guffaw 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:39
書目名稱Equality in International Society影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Equality in International Society影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality in International Society網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Equality in International Society網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality in International Society被引頻次
書目名稱Equality in International Society被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality in International Society年度引用
書目名稱Equality in International Society年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Equality in International Society讀者反饋
書目名稱Equality in International Society讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: ferment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3343-9on and exclusion of interests, and vindicates a different rationale for the organisation of international society, suggesting the establishment of a sphere of deliberation that includes other actors than states and involves all affected by international society. Hence, two central areas can be specified:作者: cataract 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:34 作者: 攝取 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:31 作者: 事情 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:27 作者: BUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:58
2947-8847 ereignty is considered a contingent rather than a necessary contention. A new framework for equality in international society is sketched out emphasising the normative strength of the principle of equality.978-1-349-35225-8978-0-230-39316-5Series ISSN 2947-8847 Series E-ISSN 2947-8855 作者: BUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:09 作者: 暖昧關(guān)系 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:24 作者: 存心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:17
C. J. Kemp,R. Bremner,A. BalmainThe title of this book involves two central concepts, equality and international society. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce these central concepts and to discuss the methodology used to analyse them. Moreover, the chapter elucidates the central principles underlying the inquiry to be carried out.作者: dry-eye 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:05 作者: ESO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:13 作者: aphasia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:04 作者: Mhc-Molecule 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:55
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393165Equality; International Society; Equality of States; International Relations; International Ethics; Globa作者: 語言學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:27 作者: 河流 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:00 作者: 高射炮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:57
Innovation and Design Process Ontologyhe state and its place in international society. Conventional wisdom narrates a ‘Hobbesian’ tradition of international thought that is largely viewed as realist, and hence linked intellectually to the heritage of Machiavelli and other classical realists. This tradition stresses things like internati作者: Adrenaline 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:02 作者: Console 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:59 作者: 巫婆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:30 作者: congenial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3343-9ests. It is shown that when applied to international society the principle will have considerable consequences. It rules out practices of discrimination and exclusion of interests, and vindicates a different rationale for the organisation of international society, suggesting the establishment of a s作者: semiskilled 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22599-9society. It is argued that this involves a widening of the realm of consideration and a broadening of the sphere of deliberation in international society. Based on this contention, an equal treatment principle is formulated that suggests a greater egalitarian commitment and engagement. While this pr作者: triptans 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:25 作者: Tartar 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:44
Two Naturalist Theoriesy development of ‘the modern state domain’ (Frost, 1996, 78). It is claimed that the development of the early modern European state and international society took place simultaneously, as parallel processes, and that the linking between the two levels of community is essential for the understanding 作者: 終止 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:31
Hobbes and the Constructivist Theory of Equalityhe state and its place in international society. Conventional wisdom narrates a ‘Hobbesian’ tradition of international thought that is largely viewed as realist, and hence linked intellectually to the heritage of Machiavelli and other classical realists. This tradition stresses things like internati作者: Culpable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:24
Equality and Hierarchyhe confederation of independent states. All decisions of the confederation, he argues, should be taken with ‘the unanimous consent of the Confederates’. Smaller countries and dominions are regarded as ‘possessions’ and are not entitled independent status or a vote of their own. Minor European states作者: 柳樹；枯黃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:11 作者: 友好關(guān)系 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:28 作者: 出生 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:35 作者: Obvious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:50
The Limits of International Societysociety. It is argued that this involves a widening of the realm of consideration and a broadening of the sphere of deliberation in international society. Based on this contention, an equal treatment principle is formulated that suggests a greater egalitarian commitment and engagement. While this pr作者: 敲詐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:19 作者: ELUC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:14 作者: 胰臟 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:48 作者: ORE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:02
Equality and Hierarchyturies. Contrary to the contemporary notion of equality of states as a relatively fixed legal principle and sustained by legal positivist theory, there were several parallel and somewhat contradictory notions of equality in international society, developed from a variety of legal and political philo作者: 碳水化合物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:40
Equality without Sovereigntyory of equality in international society. The task is to begin to formulate a minimal principle of equality that is more inclusive than is equality before the law and that does not view equality as just a corollary to sovereignty. A first step in that direction is to disentangle equality from sovere作者: Foment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:40 作者: Uncultured 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:18 作者: 偽證 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:48
Timing differences and changes in tax ratesthought and both display a range of critical normative dilemmas that still prevail when conceiving of contemporary international society and the way in which relations between communities are understood and organised.作者: hair-bulb 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:31 作者: largesse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2693-6turies. Contrary to the contemporary notion of equality of states as a relatively fixed legal principle and sustained by legal positivist theory, there were several parallel and somewhat contradictory notions of equality in international society, developed from a variety of legal and political philo作者: corporate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6760-4ory of equality in international society. The task is to begin to formulate a minimal principle of equality that is more inclusive than is equality before the law and that does not view equality as just a corollary to sovereignty. A first step in that direction is to disentangle equality from sovere作者: Fantasy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:22 作者: 雪上輕舟飛過 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:53 作者: habile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:35
