標題: Titlebook: Economics in Legal Reasoning; Péter Cserne,Fabrizio Esposito Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li [打印本頁] 作者: 可怖 時間: 2025-3-21 20:06
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning被引頻次
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning年度引用
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning讀者反饋
書目名稱Economics in Legal Reasoning讀者反饋學科排名
作者: Antimicrobial 時間: 2025-3-22 00:09
Introduction and Background Information, study, it is argued that the divergent approaches reflect a deep divide between the intellectual goals and perspectives in both disciplines. This is to be lamented, since a greater openness by legal theory and legal academics toward economic ways of looking at market interactions would greatly enrich and refine the functioning of legal systems.作者: GLOSS 時間: 2025-3-22 01:47
Biotransformations in Organic Chemistrystimonies have not survived a Daubert challenge. Explanations for such a poor record range from the judges’ insufficient economic literacy to skewed procedural rules, from the high specificity of antitrust cases to widespread identification problems in economic models.作者: corpuscle 時間: 2025-3-22 08:15 作者: 修改 時間: 2025-3-22 10:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74386-3and interpretive ones, where the former point at the reconstruction of what happened and the latter point at the ways in which legal texts can be interpreted. Both are necessary in the application of law.作者: 強化 時間: 2025-3-22 14:15 作者: 強化 時間: 2025-3-22 17:41
Book 2020ok constitutes a reference point for the economic analysis of legal institutions, as legal reasoning remains the dimension of legal systems least explored by economists..Despite their differences, economics and legal reasoning interact in many interesting ways. This book offers a fast track to these作者: enflame 時間: 2025-3-22 23:35
Economics in Judicial Decision-Making: Four Types of Situations Where Judges May Apply Economicsgement in everyday decision-making, abstract economic reasoning in explicitly economic fields of law, economic analysis of facts, and awareness of different economic theories that may have an impact on the judicial decision-making.作者: grandiose 時間: 2025-3-23 04:39
What Is Forensic Economics? forensic economics applies with special attention to tort damages and antitrust. And the fourth one considers the position of the people who carry out the forensic-economic analyses outside of or within an enforcement body.作者: acrobat 時間: 2025-3-23 05:41 作者: 維持 時間: 2025-3-23 12:11
Characterizing Economic and Legal Approaches to the Regulation of Market Interactions study, it is argued that the divergent approaches reflect a deep divide between the intellectual goals and perspectives in both disciplines. This is to be lamented, since a greater openness by legal theory and legal academics toward economic ways of looking at market interactions would greatly enrich and refine the functioning of legal systems.作者: 修飾語 時間: 2025-3-23 15:36 作者: FISC 時間: 2025-3-23 19:31 作者: Directed 時間: 2025-3-23 23:51 作者: 熱心 時間: 2025-3-24 05:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-98071-8 forensic economics applies with special attention to tort damages and antitrust. And the fourth one considers the position of the people who carry out the forensic-economic analyses outside of or within an enforcement body.作者: 危機 時間: 2025-3-24 07:34 作者: 吞噬 時間: 2025-3-24 11:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8526-2e economic analysis from the effects of the law to its content. It is useful for economists to suggest ways to increase the effectiveness of the legal system; to contribute to its functioning; as source of evidence to test economic assumptions; and to solve disagreements among economists, especially in relation to value choices.作者: 冒失 時間: 2025-3-24 17:35
Economic Approaches to Legal Reasoning: An Overviewal activity of individuals, corporate entities as well as legal officials, and (2) normative proposals concerning the design of legal processes, that is the structure of law as institutional practice.作者: Fluctuate 時間: 2025-3-24 21:07
Reverse Engineering Legal Reasoninge economic analysis from the effects of the law to its content. It is useful for economists to suggest ways to increase the effectiveness of the legal system; to contribute to its functioning; as source of evidence to test economic assumptions; and to solve disagreements among economists, especially in relation to value choices.作者: 衍生 時間: 2025-3-25 01:04 作者: Conscientious 時間: 2025-3-25 03:35 作者: organism 時間: 2025-3-25 08:44
Neha Babbar,Harinder Singh Oberoing is concerned, these contributions fall into two large groups. Economics in legal reasoning concerns arguments about the purposes and consequences of legal rules and principles that are acceptable in court as legally relevant, including (1) predictions of the likely consequences of alternative leg作者: 集合 時間: 2025-3-25 15:36 作者: 種族被根除 時間: 2025-3-25 18:51 作者: 拍翅 時間: 2025-3-25 23:18 作者: 鴿子 時間: 2025-3-26 03:46
Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry-vis the standards of relevance and reliability affirmed by the .. (1993). New data are provided on the number of antitrust economists whose expert testimonies have not survived a Daubert challenge. Explanations for such a poor record range from the judges’ insufficient economic literacy to skewed p作者: 高射炮 時間: 2025-3-26 05:01 作者: 不可接觸 時間: 2025-3-26 09:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8526-2ning”. Social engineering conceives of the law as a means to social ends and of the economist as the technician studying to what extent laws are fit for purpose. Building on this idea, reverse engineering legal reasoning is a way to identify economic concepts that describe—are coherent with or fit—t作者: 斜谷 時間: 2025-3-26 14:41 作者: 凝乳 時間: 2025-3-26 20:45
Economics in Legal Reasoning978-3-030-40168-9Series ISSN 2662-6535 Series E-ISSN 2662-6543 作者: Pastry 時間: 2025-3-26 23:51 作者: Aprope 時間: 2025-3-27 01:54 作者: Erythropoietin 時間: 2025-3-27 08:46 作者: 排他 時間: 2025-3-27 10:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40168-9Legal reasoning; Legal institutions; Forensic economics; Legal interpretation; Alternative legal decisio作者: 腐蝕 時間: 2025-3-27 17:37
978-3-030-40170-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: 治愈 時間: 2025-3-27 21:05
Introduction,he topic of economics in legal, especially judicial, reasoning stems from the opposition of two argumentative styles?in modern economics and in ordinary adjudication. Despite their differences, the commonalities between legal and economic reasoning constitute the stepping stone for investigating the作者: fledged 時間: 2025-3-28 00:41 作者: Abrupt 時間: 2025-3-28 04:06 作者: 后來 時間: 2025-3-28 09:33
Economics in Judicial Decision-Making: Four Types of Situations Where Judges May Apply Economicsay or have to apply economic thinking. The chapter focuses on four model categories where judges intentionally or unintentionally use economic considerations and economic arguments, or where there is a place for an economic consideration to be employed: issue of procedural economy and efficient mana作者: Abrade 時間: 2025-3-28 12:51 作者: Monocle 時間: 2025-3-28 16:06 作者: Intact 時間: 2025-3-28 21:56 作者: discord 時間: 2025-3-29 00:27
Fostering the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning Through Legal Realismasoning to economic reasoning. After describing the pattern of interaction between both disciplines through the example of property rights (Sect. .) and linking it to the debate on reductionism in philosophy of science (Sect. .), the chapter proposes a strategy for salvaging the autonomy of legal re作者: Feigned 時間: 2025-3-29 05:35
Reverse Engineering Legal Reasoningning”. Social engineering conceives of the law as a means to social ends and of the economist as the technician studying to what extent laws are fit for purpose. Building on this idea, reverse engineering legal reasoning is a way to identify economic concepts that describe—are coherent with or fit—t作者: 索賠 時間: 2025-3-29 08:19
2662-6535 be developed area of interaction between the disciplines..This book will be of interest to economists, legal scholars, and Law and Economics specialists, and can be used as teaching material in courses on Law & Economics and legal reasoning as well..978-3-030-40170-2978-3-030-40168-9Series ISSN 2662-6535 Series E-ISSN 2662-6543 作者: Ascendancy 時間: 2025-3-29 12:09
