標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning; The Second Chinese C Beishui Liao,Thomas ?gotnes,Yi N. Wang Conference proceedings 2019 Springer Natur [打印本頁] 作者: Myelopathy 時間: 2025-3-21 16:43
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning被引頻次
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning年度引用
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning讀者反饋
書目名稱Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 鬼魂 時間: 2025-3-21 22:15
A Dynamic Approach for Combining Abstract Argumentation Semantics,tly to labeling functions. Instead, we study stepwise update relations on argumentation frameworks whose fixpoints represent the labeling functions on the arguments. We make use of this dynamic approach in order to study novel ways of combining abstract argumentation semantics. In particular, we int作者: 浮雕寶石 時間: 2025-3-22 02:11 作者: tic-douloureux 時間: 2025-3-22 05:13 作者: SPECT 時間: 2025-3-22 08:55
Open Reading and Free Choice Permission: A Perspective in Substructural Logics,tructural logics and non-monotonic reasoning. Free choice permission is intuitively understood as “if it is permitted to do . or . then it is permitted to do . and it is permitted to do ..” Yet, one of its logically equivalent forms allows the following inference which seems unacceptable: if it is p作者: 殘忍 時間: 2025-3-22 15:31 作者: 殘忍 時間: 2025-3-22 21:05
Soft Presuppositions as Scalar Implicatures in Signaling Games,niformly in quantificational sentences. I assume that soft triggers should be associated with alternatives, and thus share many similarities with scalar implicatures. As a generalization of Parikh’s games of partial information, I develop game-theoretic models, which provide a unified account for bo作者: zonules 時間: 2025-3-22 23:11 作者: 獨輪車 時間: 2025-3-23 03:30 作者: 缺陷 時間: 2025-3-23 09:18 作者: 技術(shù) 時間: 2025-3-23 11:43
Conference proceedings 2019 by leading experts in these fields. The book covers a wide variety of topics related to dynamics, uncertainty and reasoning. It continues discussions on the interplay between logic and argumentation which has a long history from Aristotle’s ancient logic to very recent formal argumentation in AI.作者: 笨拙的我 時間: 2025-3-23 14:19 作者: 善于 時間: 2025-3-23 21:27 作者: SHRIK 時間: 2025-3-23 22:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21134-9ion framework. In the second direction, little attention has been paid to the problem of providing general rules for updating an argumentation framework aiming to enforce an extension of arguments. In this paper, we address this problem by a notion of characterizing the updated argumentation framework with respect to a given set of arguments.作者: scrutiny 時間: 2025-3-24 03:07 作者: 亞麻制品 時間: 2025-3-24 09:32
Conference proceedings 2019 presented reflect recent advances in logic and argumentation, as well as the connections between the two, and also include invited papers contributed by leading experts in these fields. The book covers a wide variety of topics related to dynamics, uncertainty and reasoning. It continues discussions作者: Postmenopause 時間: 2025-3-24 11:12
2364-4613 ynamics, uncertainty and reasoning. It continues discussions on the interplay between logic and argumentation which has a long history from Aristotle’s ancient logic to very recent formal argumentation in AI.978-981-13-7793-8978-981-13-7791-4Series ISSN 2364-4613 Series E-ISSN 2364-4621 作者: gastritis 時間: 2025-3-24 14:54
Competition and Human Relationshipseneutics is a holistic, iterative approach where we evaluate the adequacy of some candidate formalization of a sentence by computing the logical validity of (i) the whole argument it appears in and (ii) the dialectic role the argument plays in some piece of discourse.作者: tympanometry 時間: 2025-3-24 21:07 作者: pellagra 時間: 2025-3-25 00:55 作者: Hemoptysis 時間: 2025-3-25 03:25 作者: NOVA 時間: 2025-3-25 11:15 作者: 憤慨一下 時間: 2025-3-25 15:15 作者: 注意力集中 時間: 2025-3-25 19:15
Open Reading and Free Choice Permission: A Perspective in Substructural Logics,e choice permission is to exclude such counterintuitive consequences while not giving up too much deductive power. We suggest that the right way to do so is using a family of substructural logics augmented with a principle borrowed from non-monotonic reasoning. This follows up on a proposal made in?Anglberger et al. (.).作者: 發(fā)現(xiàn) 時間: 2025-3-25 21:07 作者: 職業(yè) 時間: 2025-3-26 02:01
Abstract Argumentation in Dynamic Logic: Representation, Reasoning and Change, which modify argumentation frameworks. Indeed, the basic operations on these propositional variables, viz. change of the truth values of the attack variables and the argument status variables, are nothing but atomic programs of .. We mainly focus on how the acceptance of one or more arguments can b作者: 話 時間: 2025-3-26 05:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22133-1 which modify argumentation frameworks. Indeed, the basic operations on these propositional variables, viz. change of the truth values of the attack variables and the argument status variables, are nothing but atomic programs of .. We mainly focus on how the acceptance of one or more arguments can b作者: observatory 時間: 2025-3-26 12:11 作者: 逃避責(zé)任 時間: 2025-3-26 16:16 作者: 全國性 時間: 2025-3-26 20:02 作者: 俗艷 時間: 2025-3-27 00:49 作者: 場所 時間: 2025-3-27 02:17 作者: 尾巴 時間: 2025-3-27 09:18
Logic in Asia: Studia Logica Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/284232.jpg作者: HIKE 時間: 2025-3-27 10:05
Attitudes to Technology: Part 2 to determine the extensions w.r.t. various semantics. Motivated by the acceptability and reinstatement criterion, we propose the notions of J-acceptability and J-reinstatement. Correspondingly, we introduce the J-complete semantics which reveals the gap between complete semantics and preferred sema作者: pus840 時間: 2025-3-27 13:48 作者: outset 時間: 2025-3-27 21:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21134-9ctly applied on AFs, and are invariant with respect to a chosen ‘semantics’ (that is, w.r.t. each of the conflict-free/admissible sets of arguments). Accordingly, we derive a definition of robustness for AFs in terms of the number of times such operators can be applied without producing any change i作者: Wordlist 時間: 2025-3-28 01:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21134-9ntation framework changes when the framework is updated, while the later studies how to enforce a given status of arguments by updating the argumentation framework. In the second direction, little attention has been paid to the problem of providing general rules for updating an argumentation framewo作者: 聚集 時間: 2025-3-28 05:19 作者: 故意釣到白楊 時間: 2025-3-28 08:21 作者: GRATE 時間: 2025-3-28 11:51 作者: Condyle 時間: 2025-3-28 18:03 作者: CRAFT 時間: 2025-3-28 19:55
Competition and Human Relationshipsrmeneutics, is grounded on recent progress in the area of automated theorem proving for classical and nonclassical higher order logics, and it integrates techniques from argumentation theory. It has been inspired by ideas in the philosophy of language, especially semantic holism and Donald Davidson’作者: 替代品 時間: 2025-3-28 23:16
Dynamics, Uncertainty and Reasoning978-981-13-7791-4Series ISSN 2364-4613 Series E-ISSN 2364-4621
