標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction; Seumas Miller Book 2018 The Author(s) 2018 Dual use technology.Co [打印本頁] 作者: Capricious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:17
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction被引頻次
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction年度引用
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction讀者反饋
書目名稱Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 四目在模仿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:10
2211-8101 tional remedies for dual use problems in the chemical, nucle.This book deals with the problem of dual-use science research and technology. It first explains the concept of dual use and then offers analyses of collective knowledge and collective ignorance. It goes on to present a theory of collective作者: ethereal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:59 作者: gerontocracy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:51
Concept of Dual Use,rd definition of “dual use”—at least as a preliminary definition—since some dual use research, such as Gain of Function research in the biological sciences, need not involve a process of weaponisation or a military purpose. However, further conceptual unpacking is called for and provided in this chapter.作者: meritorious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:24 作者: morale 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:51 作者: morale 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:21
Introduction, seems that, at least with respect to some technologies, knowledge is a bad thing and ignorance a good thing. Accordingly, the question arises as to whether we ought to limit scientific research and/or the development of technology and, if so, which research or technology, in what manner and to what extent.作者: 能夠支付 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:55 作者: 兩種語言 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:28 作者: GENUS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:38
Concept of Dual Use,or both: (1) Military and civilian (i.e. non-military) purposes; (2) Beneficial and harmful purposes—where the harmful purposes are to be realised by means of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs); (3) Beneficial and harmful purposes—where either the harmful purposes involve the use of weapons as means作者: 燒瓶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:25
Collective Knowledge and Collective Ignorance, be extremely harmful. Accordingly, the question arises as to whether we ought to aim at ignorance and, in particular collective ignorance, rather than scientific knowledge, of certain technologies. We might do this by means of banning certain scientific research, e.g. into biological weapons, and/o作者: Antagonism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:58 作者: 漂白 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:06 作者: 比目魚 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:21 作者: AMPLE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:15
Cyber-Technology,fits, e.g. providing for the health and safety of elderly invalids. On the other hand, autonomous robots have the potential to enable great harm, e.g. weaponised autonomous robots (so-called ‘killer robots’). As we have seen, the intended great harm is typically delivered by a weapons system of some作者: maudtin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:21 作者: 運(yùn)動(dòng)的我 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:27
Conclusion,nology and in the biological sciences. Moreover, they are exacerbated by collective action problems. However, they exist in a somewhat different form in different domains of science and technology, (e.g. nuclear vs. biological sciences), and in somewhat diverse institutional settings (e.g. universit作者: ABASH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92606-3Dual use technology; Collective responsibility; Weapons of mass destruction - WMD; Nuclear Weapons; Cybe作者: 發(fā)酵劑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:13
Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction978-3-319-92606-3Series ISSN 2211-8101 Series E-ISSN 2211-811X 作者: geometrician 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:09 作者: 責(zé)問 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:53
Weightless Neural Models: An Overviewor both: (1) Military and civilian (i.e. non-military) purposes; (2) Beneficial and harmful purposes—where the harmful purposes are to be realised by means of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs); (3) Beneficial and harmful purposes—where either the harmful purposes involve the use of weapons as means作者: 暴發(fā)戶 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:15
be extremely harmful. Accordingly, the question arises as to whether we ought to aim at ignorance and, in particular collective ignorance, rather than scientific knowledge, of certain technologies. We might do this by means of banning certain scientific research, e.g. into biological weapons, and/o作者: 的事物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:12
ientific freedom is no different in this respect. However, science is essentially a cooperative enterprise that typically takes place in institutional settings and is shaped by institutional purposes. Therefore, scientific freedom, properly understood, is in large part an expression of the intellect作者: Fretful 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:22
number of different pathways. For example, scientific research led to knowledge-how to aerolize chemicals for crop dusting (benefit); yet this discovery also made possible the aerolizing of chemicals for use in weaponry (harm). For nation-states (especially) can and do directly establish chemical w作者: 類人猿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:30
nces have enabled, on the one hand, unbounded nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and yet on the other, massive arsenals of nuclear WMDs with the potential to destroy humankind. The nuclear industry has also facilitated the potential for malevolent actors to deploy ‘dirty bombs’ and created the co作者: MORPH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:05 作者: Trochlea 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:00
Additional Psychocultural Themes so recent past, a number of governments have sought to develop biological weapons, e.g. the large-scale biological weapons program in the Soviet Union from 1946 to 1992. Moreover, there have been a number of acts, or attempted acts, of bioterrorism, notably by the Aum Shinrikyo in Japan. Techniques作者: Musket 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:34 作者: 消息靈通 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:31
Seumas MillerFirst book to deal with the ethics of dual use science/technology.Covers a wide range of dual use sciences and technologies.Provides institutional remedies for dual use problems in the chemical, nucle作者: 吊胃口 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:10
SpringerBriefs in Ethicshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/283298.jpg作者: 利用 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:24
Dual Use Science and Technology, Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction作者: Granular 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:24
Collective Responsibility,m mere causal responsibility. In doing so I also rely on the analysis of the organized, indeed organisational, action of scientists in terms of my notion of a layered structure of joint epistemic actions. This analytical notion allows me to ascribe collective moral responsibility to scientists, at l作者: 法律的瑕疵 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:22
Chemical Industry,g and potentially using chemical weapons, but rather with the intention merely of understanding the functioning of such weapons so as to enable (say) the design and production of protective clothing in case of a chemical weapons attack by one’s enemies. Such weapons research might be dual use in our作者: tic-douloureux 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:42 作者: 輕快走過 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:10
Cyber-Technology,iew to identifying cyber-technologies that are dual use technologies. It is concluded that weaponised autonomous robots, various forms of computer viruses, and ransomware are dual use technologies, but that the internet and other forms of cyber-infrastructure are not.作者: 舞蹈編排 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:25
Biological Sciences,nce. Some obvious regulatory measures that might be considered in relation to dual use issues include: regulations providing for mandatory physical safety and security of the storage, transport and physical access to samples of pathogens, equipment, laboratories etc.; mandatory licensing of dual-use作者: 積習(xí)難改 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:15
Conclusion,ical to scientists and technologists. Secondly, they are a collective moral responsibility, e.g. of scientists and governments. Thirdly, the response needs to be multi-faceted and will typically involve a so-called ‘web of prevention’ (an integrated suite of regulatory measures).作者: 商業(yè)上 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:50 作者: 征服 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:42
m mere causal responsibility. In doing so I also rely on the analysis of the organized, indeed organisational, action of scientists in terms of my notion of a layered structure of joint epistemic actions. This analytical notion allows me to ascribe collective moral responsibility to scientists, at l作者: 離開可分裂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:54 作者: intertwine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:46 作者: Overthrow 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:48
Additional Psychocultural Themesiew to identifying cyber-technologies that are dual use technologies. It is concluded that weaponised autonomous robots, various forms of computer viruses, and ransomware are dual use technologies, but that the internet and other forms of cyber-infrastructure are not.作者: 無畏 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:01 作者: 情節(jié)劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:32
Additional Psychocultural Themesical to scientists and technologists. Secondly, they are a collective moral responsibility, e.g. of scientists and governments. Thirdly, the response needs to be multi-faceted and will typically involve a so-called ‘web of prevention’ (an integrated suite of regulatory measures).作者: 拘留 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:08
2211-8101 ignorance of it a bad thing. On the other hand, these same technologies can be extremely harmful to individuals and collectives, as with the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So, at least with re978-3-319-92605-6978-3-319-92606-3Series ISSN 2211-8101 Series E-ISSN 2211-811X
