標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World; Francis N. Okpaleke Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), und [打印本頁] 作者: hormone-therapy 時間: 2025-3-21 16:21
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World被引頻次
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World年度引用
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World讀者反饋
書目名稱Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: OTTER 時間: 2025-3-21 21:45 作者: 蚊子 時間: 2025-3-22 01:37 作者: disrupt 時間: 2025-3-22 07:53
Drone Warfare and US Grand Strategy During the Bush Administration,ts these actions countered Bush‘s strategy, resulting in unintended casualties, increased anti-Americanism, insurgent retaliation, and extremist recruitment. Despite limited proliferation, armed drones’ deployment under Bush set the stage for their broader adoption, showcasing their counterterrorism effectiveness.作者: 值得 時間: 2025-3-22 08:54 作者: tympanometry 時間: 2025-3-22 14:56
The Dialectics and Dilemma of US Drone Warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan, strategic objectives. Afghanistan and Pakistan are chosen due to their extensive history of post-9/11 drone strikes, and available data for impact assessment. While other case studies exist, this chapter centres on Afghanistan and Pakistan for their robust datasets.作者: tympanometry 時間: 2025-3-22 20:10
Book 2023r-reaching consequences for US grand strategy. By examining how successive US administrations since 9/11 have deployed drones in pursuant of different typologies of US grand strategic objectives, the book probes the putative political and strategic goals drones supposedly advance, and the impact of 作者: IRS 時間: 2025-3-22 22:13
Peter Zoche,Simone Kimpeler,Markus Joepgena paradox worthy of exploration. Their advancement sparks concern over destabilization, surveillance, and adverse security implications. Balancing the tactical gains of drones with their potential consequences necessitates a deeper investigation.作者: Mirage 時間: 2025-3-23 03:08
Peter Zoche,Simone Kimpeler,Markus Joepgendilemmas, and blowback from targeted states. The chapter argues that drones’ tactical usage bears substantial strategic and political ramifications in targeted states, detrimentally affecting US grand strategy.作者: 抗體 時間: 2025-3-23 09:36 作者: OWL 時間: 2025-3-23 13:16 作者: INCH 時間: 2025-3-23 17:30 作者: Keratectomy 時間: 2025-3-23 21:13
,Obama’s Drone Wars and US Grand Strategy,geted states, including anti-American sentiments, retaliations, and suicide attacks. This paradox highlights drones’ efficacy alongside overreliance under Obama, negatively impacting US counterterrorism against both rivals and non-state actors.作者: gimmick 時間: 2025-3-24 01:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56278-5lluminated the potential of airpower and proliferation in shaping US strategic goals. Drones emerged as pivotal in aiding ground troops, facilitating guided-missile launches through reconnaissance, and impacting combat missions. They also proved strategic in enhancing force capabilities, precise targeting, and remote aerial assaults.作者: cogent 時間: 2025-3-24 03:16 作者: Thyroxine 時間: 2025-3-24 08:35
Vom neurologischen Symptom zur Diagnosethe post-Cold War consensus on liberal hegemony. Despite effective terrorist threat neutralization, escalated drone utilization led to negative outcomes for Trump‘s grand strategy, including civilian casualties, growing anti-US sentiment, and retaliatory attacks in targeted states.作者: 提名 時間: 2025-3-24 13:42 作者: 性別 時間: 2025-3-24 15:07 作者: 知識 時間: 2025-3-24 23:03
Francis N. OkpalekeEvaluates the tactical and strategic implications of lethal drone deployment in targeted states.Examines how successive US administrations since 9/11 have deployed drones in pursuant of different US g作者: 燈泡 時間: 2025-3-25 02:12 作者: Antioxidant 時間: 2025-3-25 04:55
Peter Zoche,Simone Kimpeler,Markus Joepgenity” (the US), drones serve as tactical tools for targeted operations, reducing warfare costs and risks. In the other “City” (targeted states, like Afghanistan and Pakistan), drones provoke collateral damage, territorial violations, and anti-American sentiments. While effective in achieving short-te作者: 移動 時間: 2025-3-25 11:04
Peter Zoche,Simone Kimpeler,Markus Joepgenserving as a critical lens for the study. The analysis underscores the influence of tactical force application and technological adoption on grand strategic choices. US grand strategy typologies are explored, offering an analytical framework for understanding the evolution of post-9/11 US drone warf作者: 點燃 時間: 2025-3-25 14:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56278-5f drones by successive US administrations, tracing their origins from World War I to the Kosovo War. Emphasizing their post-9/11 lethal weaponization and strategic use, the chapter highlights their evolutionary roots, particularly in the Cold War era. Notably, during this period, drones’ evolution i作者: Prognosis 時間: 2025-3-25 17:24 作者: 不能根除 時間: 2025-3-25 23:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56278-5s reflected a dual-edged approach aligning with the administration‘s hybrid strategy. This strategy aimed at showcasing America‘s global engagement, yet also exhibited military assertiveness. While drones proved advantageous for counterterrorism, their signature strikes generated a security paradox 作者: 上下倒置 時間: 2025-3-26 00:32
Vom neurologischen Symptom zur Diagnoseased drone use in targeted states aligned with his counterterrorism approach. These strategic objectives aligned with the doctrine of his administration, which promoted a “nativist, protectionist, and nationalist-isolationist vision for the US under the populist slogan ‘America First,‘” challenging 作者: 不舒服 時間: 2025-3-26 04:34 作者: Allege 時間: 2025-3-26 12:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56278-5tates to adopt similar technologies, creating security dilemmas and challenges for US strategic objectives. While not delving into arms trade debates, this chapter focuses on the essential issue of proliferation. It sheds light on how drones undermine US goals and reveals risks associated with their作者: 殺人 時間: 2025-3-26 14:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56278-5 utilization and its implications for grand strategic objectives. It revisits the central themes and paradoxes surrounding the incorporation of drones into US grand strategy. Future US grand strategy, as illuminated in this chapter, should grapple with these challenges by establishing clear rules of作者: 連系 時間: 2025-3-26 17:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47730-0Drone; Security; Military; Defense; US Grand Strategy; US Army作者: Ascendancy 時間: 2025-3-26 23:09 作者: growth-factor 時間: 2025-3-27 01:32
Drones and US Grand Strategy in the Contemporary World978-3-031-47730-0Series ISSN 2731-0329 Series E-ISSN 2731-0337 作者: Legion 時間: 2025-3-27 07:54 作者: Fibrin 時間: 2025-3-27 13:07 作者: ABYSS 時間: 2025-3-27 16:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56278-5ition in the international realm. To this end, changes are necessary in US grand strategy to ensure global security is not further destabilized particularly as new technologies like AI become integrated into warfare.作者: 柳樹；枯黃 時間: 2025-3-27 18:48
2731-0329 political and military ends, as well as the underlying implications for US grand strategy and international security at large..978-3-031-47732-4978-3-031-47730-0Series ISSN 2731-0329 Series E-ISSN 2731-0337 作者: 易怒 時間: 2025-3-27 22:55
Conclusion,ition in the international realm. To this end, changes are necessary in US grand strategy to ensure global security is not further destabilized particularly as new technologies like AI become integrated into warfare.作者: Legend 時間: 2025-3-28 02:50
Introduction,ity” (the US), drones serve as tactical tools for targeted operations, reducing warfare costs and risks. In the other “City” (targeted states, like Afghanistan and Pakistan), drones provoke collateral damage, territorial violations, and anti-American sentiments. While effective in achieving short-te作者: 頌揚本人 時間: 2025-3-28 08:04
Unmasking the Nexus: Exploring US Grand Strategy and the Dynamic Role of Drones,serving as a critical lens for the study. The analysis underscores the influence of tactical force application and technological adoption on grand strategic choices. US grand strategy typologies are explored, offering an analytical framework for understanding the evolution of post-9/11 US drone warf作者: 不可救藥 時間: 2025-3-28 11:55 作者: coddle 時間: 2025-3-28 16:31 作者: ALT 時間: 2025-3-28 22:49 作者: Verify 時間: 2025-3-29 02:14
