標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics; Yafeng Shan Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerl [打印本頁] 作者: fumble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:16
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics被引頻次
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics年度引用
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics讀者反饋
書目名稱Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 難理解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:07
William Fielding Ogburn,Bruno Bettelheimhas been constantly challenged and questioned. Nevertheless, substantial hope for HPS as a productive academic discipline is not dead. Some historically-minded philosophers of science and philosophically-minded historians of science never stop making efforts to promote the dialogue across the bounda作者: ARIA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:32
J. Z. Young,Everett D. Erb,Douglas Hookere problem of heredity. It is now a consensus that Mendel’s concern, literally speaking, was about the development of hybrids in their progeny. However, there is no consensus on what Mendel meant by development (.). Nor is there an agreement on the interpretation of Mendel’s laws of developmental ser作者: plasma-cells 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:17 作者: 暫時(shí)過來 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:43 作者: 平靜生活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:59
Accessing an Element of a Data Structure in what sense? What was Mendel’s contribution to the origin of genetics? What role did Mendel’s work play in the “rediscovery” in 1900? What was the contribution made by the “rediscoverers” to the origin of genetics? What is a best way to analyse and interpret the origin of genetics, from a philoso作者: 平靜生活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:26
Translating Boolean Expressionsthe progress in the history of genetics. First of all, motivated by the exemplar-based approach, I propose a new functional approach to scientific progress, in which scientific progress is defined in terms of usefulness of problem-defining and problem-solving. Secondly, I further develop a functiona作者: 莎草 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:05
Translating Arithmetic Expressionsproblem of the long neglect and provides a new philosophical explanation. I begin with a distinction between two versions of the problem. I critically examine the traditional diagnoses of the problem. Then I defend the exemplar-based account of Mendel’s contribution. Finally, I further develop an ex作者: EWE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:38 作者: SHOCK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:44 作者: Range-Of-Motion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:40 作者: Pelago 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50617-9Conceptual Change; Kuhn’s Legacy; Origins of Genetics; Scientific Change; Scientific Progress; Mendel; Men作者: chandel 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:46
978-3-030-50619-3Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020作者: 蚊帳 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:45
Yafeng ShanRevisits the history of early genetics.Develops the exemplar-based approach to the development of science.Introduces new accounts of conceptual change, evidential practice, and theory choice作者: burnish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:13 作者: apiary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:28
Introduction,has been constantly challenged and questioned. Nevertheless, substantial hope for HPS as a productive academic discipline is not dead. Some historically-minded philosophers of science and philosophically-minded historians of science never stop making efforts to promote the dialogue across the bounda作者: 改變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:37
Mendel’s Pisum Revisitede problem of heredity. It is now a consensus that Mendel’s concern, literally speaking, was about the development of hybrids in their progeny. However, there is no consensus on what Mendel meant by development (.). Nor is there an agreement on the interpretation of Mendel’s laws of developmental ser作者: Flavouring 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:28
De Vries’ Mendelism Reassessedever, there is still lack of a systematic evaluation of de Vries’ incorporation. It is unclear in what sense de Vries’ incorporation was significant for the origin of genetics. Nor is it very clear what role Mendel’s work played in de Vries’ incorporation. Would there have been a Mendelian theory of作者: 龍卷風(fēng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:37
Weldon’s Choice Reconsideredf heredity in the first decade of the twentieth century. Accordingly, the examinations of Weldon’s work are typically framed within the context of the Mendelian-Biometrician controversy. This chapter revisits the significance of Weldon’s work in the history of genetics by examining Weldon’s view on 作者: 衰老 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:16
Exemplarising the Origin of Genetics in what sense? What was Mendel’s contribution to the origin of genetics? What role did Mendel’s work play in the “rediscovery” in 1900? What was the contribution made by the “rediscoverers” to the origin of genetics? What is a best way to analyse and interpret the origin of genetics, from a philoso作者: 輕浮思想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:29 作者: 姑姑在炫耀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:43
The Problem of the Long Neglect Revisited: An Exemplar-Based Explanationproblem of the long neglect and provides a new philosophical explanation. I begin with a distinction between two versions of the problem. I critically examine the traditional diagnoses of the problem. Then I defend the exemplar-based account of Mendel’s contribution. Finally, I further develop an ex作者: Customary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:36 作者: Thrombolysis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:11 作者: 極大痛苦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:36
Promisingness in Theory Choicepproach, I argue that theory choice is a situation where scientists are reasoning what theory should be favoured as the most promising theory in the area rather than the one where scientists choose a theory among all the alternatives to be the best theory in the area. Then, I elaborate the concept o作者: 責(zé)怪 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:29
Book 2020s?helps us to have a better understanding of the history of genetics, and sheds light on some general issues in the philosophy of science.?This book consists of three parts. It begins with historical problems, revisiting the significance of the work of Mendel, de Vries, and Weldon. Then it turns to 作者: 流動(dòng)性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:46
The Problem of the Long Neglect Revisited: An Exemplar-Based Explanation examine the traditional diagnoses of the problem. Then I defend the exemplar-based account of Mendel’s contribution. Finally, I further develop an exemplar-based explanation of problem of the long neglect.作者: Flustered 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:16 作者: Frequency-Range 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 13:56 作者: 無表情 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:46
Translating Boolean Expressionsl account of the progress in early genetics. Thirdly, I argue that the new functional approach well resolves the problems of the traditional functional approach. Fourthly, I highlight the advantages of my new functional account over the epistemic and semantic accounts and dismiss some potential objections to my account.作者: 分散 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:17 作者: expdient 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:29 作者: FADE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:35 作者: observatory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16304-5stic approach to conceptual change. By distinguishing two modes of continuity, I also propose a new mode of conceptual continuity. Finally, I illustrate and defend my approach by revisiting my historical case study.作者: Seizure 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:06 作者: 食物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:53
Introduction,at a balanced inquiry from which both history of science and philosophy of science can benefit. In a nutshell, integrated HPS maintains that HPS should be both a good philosophy of science and a good history of science at the same time.作者: 地牢 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:55 作者: 重力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:57 作者: 精美食品 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:31 作者: cogitate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:03
Promisingness in Theory Choicetial progressiveness, Lakatos’ predictive novelty, McMullin’s P-fertility, Laudan’s fertility-promise, Ivani’s fruitfulness, and ?e?elja et al’s pursuit worthiness. Finally, I argue for the promisingness criterion from a normative viewpoint.作者: 完成 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:53 作者: 吼叫 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:14
Exemplarising the Origin of Geneticsphical point of view? This chapter provides a new philosophical account of the early development of genetics. I begin with a critical review of the theory-based analyses of the origin of genetics. Then inspired by the Kuhnian analyses, I develop an exemplar-based account of the origin of genetics based on a new interpretation of exemplar.作者: 鋸齒狀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:27 作者: 協(xié)定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16304-5argue for a practice-based solution to the gap problem. I begin with the case of Mendel’s evidence to illustrate the gap problem and show why the Achinsteinian solution fails. Then, I propose an account of a good H-D evidential practice. I further argue that the gap problem can be well resolved by my account.作者: 情感 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:34
The Gap Problem in Hypothetico-Deductivismargue for a practice-based solution to the gap problem. I begin with the case of Mendel’s evidence to illustrate the gap problem and show why the Achinsteinian solution fails. Then, I propose an account of a good H-D evidential practice. I further argue that the gap problem can be well resolved by my account.作者: Platelet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:06
0068-0346 ual change, evidential practice, and theory choice.This book offers an integrated historical and philosophical examination of the origin of genetics. The author contends that an integrated HPS analysis?helps us to have a better understanding of the history of genetics, and sheds light on some genera作者: AXIS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:47
Translating Arithmetic Expressions examine the traditional diagnoses of the problem. Then I defend the exemplar-based account of Mendel’s contribution. Finally, I further develop an exemplar-based explanation of problem of the long neglect.作者: 有害 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:44
Book 2020 issues in Part III. Part III develops new philosophical accounts which will in turn make a better sense of the history of scientific practice more generally. This book provides a practical defence of integrated HPS: the best way to defend integrated HPS is to do it..作者: Hyperalgesia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:01
Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics
