標題: Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?; Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet [打印本頁] 作者: 監(jiān)管 時間: 2025-3-21 16:22
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?網絡公開度
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?網絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引頻次
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?讀者反饋
書目名稱Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?讀者反饋學科排名
作者: FEAT 時間: 2025-3-21 22:47 作者: 寡頭政治 時間: 2025-3-22 01:11 作者: Endearing 時間: 2025-3-22 07:15
Two Theories of Moral Cognition,tists have turned to reinforcement learning, a branch of machine learning, to develop formal, mathematical models of normative cognition. One prominent approach, proposed by Cushman (Curr Opin Behav Sci 3:58–62, 2015), suggests that moral cognition is underwritten by a habitual (‘model-free’) system作者: 搜尋 時間: 2025-3-22 08:44
Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism,uch recent discussion focuses on the dispute between ., who hold that there is a necessary connection between moral judgment and motivation, and ., who deny this. In contrast, I argue that this relation is best seen as a . one: moral judgment . to be accompanied by the appropriate motivation. I supp作者: 權宜之計 時間: 2025-3-22 15:19 作者: 權宜之計 時間: 2025-3-22 18:51
,Normative Implications of Neuroscience and Sociobiology – Intended and Perceived,ic “nature-nurture” debates, including the sociobiology controversy around Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson. Neuroscience is the field that Wilson hoped would continue his work in . (Wilson, Sociobiology: The new synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, .)?in regard to finding an evolutiona作者: Flawless 時間: 2025-3-22 23:11
Nervous Norms,a moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to muster an empirically informed moral view is only one way to err regarding the relationship between empirical facts and moral norms. We might also make the mistake of . on facts when engaging moral q作者: 立即 時間: 2025-3-23 01:22 作者: judiciousness 時間: 2025-3-23 09:05
Autistic Moral Agency and Integrative Neuroethics, neuroscience and ethics and specifies three possible ways (solving ethical issues in specific contexts, developing normative standards that can be used to regulate and evaluate the behaviors of a group of individuals with particular cognitive abilities or disabilities, and identifying and correctin作者: 膽大 時間: 2025-3-23 11:13 作者: 消息靈通 時間: 2025-3-23 13:55 作者: SOW 時間: 2025-3-23 19:51 作者: 頭盔 時間: 2025-3-24 00:48 作者: 不安 時間: 2025-3-24 04:54 作者: 推遲 時間: 2025-3-24 10:10 作者: BLA 時間: 2025-3-24 14:01 作者: 有常識 時間: 2025-3-24 16:36 作者: Communicate 時間: 2025-3-24 19:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0899-0 reveals four surprising empirical discoveries about the nature of pain with relevance for ethics. In particular, we discuss the ways in which these discoveries both inform putative normative ethical principles concerning pain and illuminate metaethical debates concerning a realist, naturalist moral作者: cortisol 時間: 2025-3-25 00:34 作者: conjunctivitis 時間: 2025-3-25 03:37 作者: 品嘗你的人 時間: 2025-3-25 07:45
Empirische Transformationsforschungretributive and consequentialist. In general, retributivist considerations are backward-looking and thus justify punishment in terms of “just deserts.” By contrast, consequentialist considerations are forward-looking and thus justify punishment in terms of its good effects. This chapter contends tha作者: TERRA 時間: 2025-3-25 12:06 作者: 獨輪車 時間: 2025-3-25 18:04
Means of Production in Agriculturea moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to muster an empirically informed moral view is only one way to err regarding the relationship between empirical facts and moral norms. We might also make the mistake of . on facts when engaging moral q作者: 碎石 時間: 2025-3-25 21:50 作者: FOR 時間: 2025-3-26 03:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96674-4 neuroscience and ethics and specifies three possible ways (solving ethical issues in specific contexts, developing normative standards that can be used to regulate and evaluate the behaviors of a group of individuals with particular cognitive abilities or disabilities, and identifying and correctin作者: Concrete 時間: 2025-3-26 05:27 作者: 帶來的感覺 時間: 2025-3-26 08:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5neuroethics; normative implications; neuroscience; prosocial behavior; mind perception and morality; mora作者: Pamphlet 時間: 2025-3-26 16:06 作者: FEAS 時間: 2025-3-26 20:33
Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth HildtThe only collection dedicated exclusively to essays addressing the implications of neuroscience for philosophical ethics.Brings together the philosophical subdisciplines of ethics and philosophy of co作者: Affluence 時間: 2025-3-26 23:16 作者: foodstuff 時間: 2025-3-27 02:48 作者: micronutrients 時間: 2025-3-27 08:34 作者: prolate 時間: 2025-3-27 09:41
Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences. In contrast, in applying the other two readings, neuroscience can only be said to have normative implications in a very indirect way and only under the condition of making contested metaethical assumptions. All in all, the room for inferring concrete normative judgments from neuroscientific eviden作者: 艦旗 時間: 2025-3-27 14:40
Topology of Real Algebraic Setsenalism. I argue that worries for moral responsibility based on these perceived threats are ultimately unfounded. Neuroscientific findings may invite refinements and even important modifications of how we understand our own agency, but these adjustments would fall far short of any drastic revision a作者: 遣返回國 時間: 2025-3-27 19:45 作者: 懸崖 時間: 2025-3-27 23:00 作者: Lignans 時間: 2025-3-28 03:17
Transformation in Ungarn und der DDR from facts to values, and tentative results often come to serve policy purposes (Segerstrale, Defenders of the truth: the battle for science in the sociobiology debate and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000). In the present social situation, I am particularly worried about the use of the作者: Aids209 時間: 2025-3-28 07:26
Means of Production in Agricultureoomed to moral and epistemic failure. This mistake has been well documented by KWM Fulford and this chapter attempts to apply this fundamental mistake of psychiatric ethics as a moral and methodological lesson for future neuroethics. This chapter closes with a plea for interdisciplinary teams to be 作者: 無力更進 時間: 2025-3-28 11:07 作者: 不開心 時間: 2025-3-28 16:07 作者: Certainty 時間: 2025-3-28 22:11 作者: 正常 時間: 2025-3-29 02:13 作者: 代理人 時間: 2025-3-29 05:55
Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism,s. I argue that such a conception of moral judgment is both descriptively and normatively adequate. Such considerations provide reasons to reject motivation internalism. However, rather than simply adopt externalism, I argue that the relation between moral judgment and motivation is governed by a no作者: 厚臉皮 時間: 2025-3-29 08:27
The Reactive Roots of Retribution: Normative Implications of the Neuroscience of Punishment, and the considerations that support it. More precisely, these intuitions are not good evidence for normative theories of punishment. This argument may have implications for a range of non-consequentialist principles and intuitions that extend beyond the domain of punishment. This chapter extends th作者: intelligible 時間: 2025-3-29 14:12 作者: 美食家 時間: 2025-3-29 17:13
Nervous Norms,oomed to moral and epistemic failure. This mistake has been well documented by KWM Fulford and this chapter attempts to apply this fundamental mistake of psychiatric ethics as a moral and methodological lesson for future neuroethics. This chapter closes with a plea for interdisciplinary teams to be
