標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census; Who is Missed? William P.‘O’Hare Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Autho [打印本頁] 作者: 鏟除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:59
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census被引頻次
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census年度引用
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census讀者反饋
書目名稱Differential Undercounts in the U.S. Census讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 協(xié)議 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:23 作者: 沒有貧窮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:01 作者: 愛好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:23
Rui A. Alves,Teresa Limpo,R. Malatesha Joshifactors which raise concerns about whether differential undercounts will be reduced in the 2020 Census. Lack of adequate funding for the Census Bureau and high reliance on the internet are two areas which may lead to higher differential undercounts in 2020.作者: 無聊點(diǎn)好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:39 作者: dilute 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10973-8Demographic Analysis; Population Forecast; Population Growth; 2020 Census; U; S; Census Bureau作者: dilute 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:02 作者: affinity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:08
Geocriticism and Spatial Literary StudiesThe two primary methods used to assess Census coverage in the U.S. are Demographic Analysis (DA) and Dual-Systems Estimates (DSE). These two methods are introduced in this Chapter along with some of their strengths and weaknesses.作者: mastoid-bone 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:25 作者: CARE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:13
Izabela Pietras,Marta ?ockiewiczOver the past several decades the Census Bureau has engaged in many activities and programs aimed at reducing or eliminating differential undercounts. Several of the more prominent efforts to solve this problem are reviewed in this Chapter.作者: 憤憤不平 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:30
Methodology Used to Measure Census Coverage,The two primary methods used to assess Census coverage in the U.S. are Demographic Analysis (DA) and Dual-Systems Estimates (DSE). These two methods are introduced in this Chapter along with some of their strengths and weaknesses.作者: escalate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:44
Undercount Differentials by Tenure,Over the past several decades the population living in rental housing units has consistently had net undercounts while the population living in owner-occupied housing units had net overcounts. In this Chapter the coverage differentials by tenure are analyzed and the impact of this differential on different sociodemographic groups is explored.作者: Anal-Canal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:38 作者: 使聲音降低 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:24 作者: 放逐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:25
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55885-5cratic system of government. In addition, Census-related figures are used to distribute more than $800 billion in federal funding each year to states and localities. Countless decisions in the public and private sectors are based on Census data. Moreover, the impact of flaws in Census counts often l作者: corn732 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:09 作者: 相同 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:10 作者: emission 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:39 作者: 提煉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:09
Reading Populism with Bourdieu and Eliasopulation. The omissions rate for Hispanics (7.7%) was about twice the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). Hispanic men age 18–49 had net undercount rates over 5% and omissions rates over 10% in the 2010 Census.作者: isotope 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:48 作者: 協(xié)議 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9479-0on-Hispanic White Alone population. Asians also had a relatively low omissions rate in the 2010 Census. The omissions rate for Asians Alone or in Combination (5.3%) was slightly higher than the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). The Asian age/sex group with the highest net undercount rate was作者: Concrete 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:17
The How, When, and Why of Mathematics,pulation have high net undercount and omissions rates. The omissions rate for American Indians and Alaskan Natives Alone or in Combination was 7.6% which is double the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). Also, Census coverage for American Indians and Alaskan Natives living on reservations was 作者: 上下倒置 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:01 作者: 保全 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:12 作者: Fresco 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:49 作者: 放逐 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:13
Planning management control systemsapter and the relationship between net undercounts and omissions is reiterated. The importance of the Census is highlighted and ways in which readers can get involved in promoting a better 2020 Census are described here.作者: mortuary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:44
William P.‘O’HareThis open access book provides an overview of which groups have the highest net undercounts and which groups have the higher undercount differentials in the US census.Discusses why census undercounts 作者: nutrients 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:51 作者: locus-ceruleus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:22
Census Coverage of the Hispanic Population,opulation. The omissions rate for Hispanics (7.7%) was about twice the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). Hispanic men age 18–49 had net undercount rates over 5% and omissions rates over 10% in the 2010 Census.作者: Antimicrobial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:13 作者: 調(diào)色板 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:10
Getting Ready for the 2020 Census,factors which raise concerns about whether differential undercounts will be reduced in the 2020 Census. Lack of adequate funding for the Census Bureau and high reliance on the internet are two areas which may lead to higher differential undercounts in 2020.作者: nautical 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:23 作者: 可用 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:56 作者: staging 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:43 作者: Cirrhosis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:43 作者: 彈藥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:06
The Big Picture; Fundamentals of Differential Undercounts,ferences among groups. Basic differences in Census coverage by age, sex, race, Hispanic Origin, and tenure are explored in this Chapter. Key findings include, young children (age 0–4) have a higher net undercount than any other age group; males have a higher net undercount than females; Blacks, Amer作者: tendinitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:14 作者: covert 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:49 作者: myalgia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:10
Census Coverage of the Hispanic Population,opulation. The omissions rate for Hispanics (7.7%) was about twice the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). Hispanic men age 18–49 had net undercount rates over 5% and omissions rates over 10% in the 2010 Census.作者: 恃強(qiáng)凌弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:47 作者: 小口啜飲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:16
Census Coverage of the Asian Population,on-Hispanic White Alone population. Asians also had a relatively low omissions rate in the 2010 Census. The omissions rate for Asians Alone or in Combination (5.3%) was slightly higher than the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). The Asian age/sex group with the highest net undercount rate was作者: JUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:07 作者: opprobrious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:45
Census Coverage of the Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Population,te for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders Alone or in Combination in 2010 was 1.0% compared to a net overcount of 0.8%?for the Non-Hispanic White Alone population. The omissions rate for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders Alone or in Combination (7.9%)?is about double the rate for Non-Hispanic W作者: 制定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:05
Potential Explanations for Why People Are Missed in the U.S. Census,n is provided on several of the leading ideas about why people are missed in the Census along with data related to many of the ideas. The topic is first approached from broad theoretical perspective then more detailed reasons are examined. The chapter draws heavily on the literature in survey resear作者: Ejaculate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:24 作者: Enteropathic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:12
Summary,apter and the relationship between net undercounts and omissions is reiterated. The importance of the Census is highlighted and ways in which readers can get involved in promoting a better 2020 Census are described here.作者: 硬化 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:00
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2019However, given the dearth of accurate undercount data for these groups, they are covered less comprehensively than those demographic groups for which there is reliable undercount data from the Census Bureau. This book is of interest to demographers, statisticians, survey methodologists, and all those interested in census coverage..作者: CURB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:21
Who Is Missing? Undercounts and Omissions in the U.S. Census,ated to measuring the accuracy of Census counts, sometimes called Census coverage. Some of the key terminology is also discussed in this Chapter along with a description of the intended audience for this publication. The contents of the publication are described Chapter by Chapter.作者: 宇宙你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 01:39
The Importance of Census Accuracy: Uses of Census Data,and localities. Countless decisions in the public and private sectors are based on Census data. Moreover, the impact of flaws in Census counts often last a decade because population estimates, projections, and survey weights, are derived from Census counts.作者: BOLUS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:01
Census Coverage Differentials by Age, about why people are missed or overcounted are explored. Young children age 0–4 had the highest net undercount rate and highest omissions rate of any age group in the 2010 Census. The college-age population (age 18–24) and elderly people (over age 60) had net overcounts.作者: FEAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:47
Census Coverage Differentials by Sex,s net undercount rates while females have net overcounts. Since 1940, the net undercount rates of both males and females have improved a lot but the differential between males and females has not narrowed.作者: habile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:38 作者: Collision 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 19:49
Census Coverage of American Indians and Alaskan Natives,ich is double the rate for Non-Hispanic White Alone (3.8%). Also, Census coverage for American Indians and Alaskan Natives living on reservations was much worse than for this population living elsewhere. The net undercount rate for American Indians Alone and Alaskan Natives or in Combination living on reservations was 4.9% in the 2010 Census.作者: 一加就噴出 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 22:50
