標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research; John Forge Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Just War Theory.c [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Levelheaded 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:31
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research年度引用
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Herpetologist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:26
Weapons, Weapons Research and the Case Against Weapons Research,s, so I begin with some general remarks about weapons and about how we might define and characterise them. Here I also comment briefly on the history of weapons development. In the last two sections of the chapter I introduce the moral dimension of WR, explain why it is wrong and state the case agai作者: 思考而得 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:50 作者: Malfunction 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:09 作者: enormous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:30 作者: periodontitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:55 作者: periodontitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:03 作者: concert 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:43 作者: 造反,叛亂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:38
Weapons Research, Contexts and Justifications, and the Analogy with Explanation,compromised activity, one that appeals to the actual historical circumstances – the . – in which the work is done. We have seen that weapons research has a history stretching back over two millennia, and the products of WR, from catapults to atomic weapons, have played a crucial role in shaping worl作者: 繞著哥哥問(wèn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:05 作者: 讓空氣進(jìn)入 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:50 作者: FECT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:58 作者: 宴會(huì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:42 作者: Minuet 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:48
Book 2013ind of scientific and technological endeavour has been around for a long time, producing not only the armaments of Nazi Germany and the atomic bombs dropped on Japan, but the catapults used in ancient Greece and Rome and the assault rifles used by child soldiers in Africa.? In this book John Forge e作者: affinity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:19
2212-9529 is morally wrong and morally unjustifable.Provides a wide ra.The pilot-less drones, smart bombs and other high-tech weapons on display in recent conflicts are all the outcome of weapons research. However, the kind of scientific and technological endeavour has been around for a long time, producing n作者: 擺動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4982-2ners, who provide the means to harm are required to justify themselves, as are people who actually harm. However, the fact that harming is morally wrong requires no argument. Thus this opening chapter falls into two sections, the first is about weapons and the second states the case against weapons research.作者: 免除責(zé)任 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:40 作者: 尊敬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:51
Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research作者: modest 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:51
2212-9529 n fields of philosophy and related areas, as well to a more general audience who are puzzled about the rate at which new weapons are accumulated. .978-94-007-9524-2978-94-007-5736-3Series ISSN 2212-9529 Series E-ISSN 2212-9537 作者: Mast-Cell 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:09 作者: 粗糙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:45 作者: MOCK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:04 作者: 付出 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:26 作者: Aviary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:50
Juan I. Castrillo,Stephen G. Oliverterceptor aircraft left, but they had none, and the US air force was so confident of this that the planes sent to bomb the cities had no escorts. But there is no plausible defence, either in existence nor even really in theory, that can resist a sustained offensive with ICBMs. Nuclear weapons also d作者: 天空 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:28
Toni Gabaldón,Marina Marcet-Houbened before we can begin to look at the most convincing justifications of WR, and I will explain what these are in Sect. 6.1 of what follows. Most of the balance of the chapter will be devoted to one of these issues, namely to the choice of a code or system of morality, which will be used to support t作者: Bronchial-Tubes 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:33
Iuliana V. Ene,Alistair J. P. Brown “using a product of the Manhattan Project to bomb on Hiroshima” – although those descriptions might not apply, owing to restrictions imposed by the Limits Principle. But this does suggest a general way of describing WR, one that takes account of a property of all weapons, namely, that they are the 作者: NATAL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:51
Ekaterina Shelest,Kerstin Voigt deter or perhaps reduce harms. If there are, then S can claim that the weapons she was designing when her country, or another friendly state, was under attack, or threat of attack, were defensive, designed to prevent harm to her fellow citizens. But granted that the weapons are ‘inherently defensiv作者: 白楊魚(yú) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7804-5tively, and to make some simplifications and generalisations. We have in place a method for deciding when a violation of a moral rule is (weakly or strongly) justified, and we have seen that engaging in WR is to violate a moral rule. What we need to do now is to apply this method to the question of 作者: 眼界 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:41
Blastomycosis and Phaeohyphomycosisto ancient Greece. It is not surprising that there has been a long-standing tradition of thinking about how war can be just, given that war has been such a perennial feature of human history. Surely all wars cannot be bad, for, if they are, then does this not condemn all the societies and states tha作者: extrovert 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06088-6e main academic field for the study of war in the modern world, where the prevailing view is ., sometimes called . or power politics. And I said that this perspective is relevant to the present inquiry, because it provides an alternative way of looking at war, and (hence) at WR. One of the conclusio作者: Frequency-Range 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:41
Histoplasmosis and Coccidioidomycosisy has thus been in existence for nearly two and half millennia, and ranks with agriculture and building as one of the oldest industries in continuous existence. Arms production became ‘industrialised’ in the nineteenth century, when modern methods of production informed by scientific understanding o作者: 意外 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:01 作者: Arresting 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:59 作者: 敘述 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:51
The Development of Projectile Weapons: Ancient Catapults,nd horn, smaller and more powerful than the ‘self-bow’ constructed from a single piece of wood, appeared in the fourth millennium BCE. I resist the temptation to date the beginnings of weapons research with reference to any of these innovations regarding the bow or the sling – I expect some case cou作者: synovium 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:51 作者: 語(yǔ)源學(xué) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:45
The Development of Nuclear Weapons,terceptor aircraft left, but they had none, and the US air force was so confident of this that the planes sent to bomb the cities had no escorts. But there is no plausible defence, either in existence nor even really in theory, that can resist a sustained offensive with ICBMs. Nuclear weapons also d作者: 半圓鑿 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:29 作者: 破譯密碼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:25 作者: TOXIC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:27 作者: frenzy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:38 作者: VEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:23 作者: 信條 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:14
War and Realism,e main academic field for the study of war in the modern world, where the prevailing view is ., sometimes called . or power politics. And I said that this perspective is relevant to the present inquiry, because it provides an alternative way of looking at war, and (hence) at WR. One of the conclusio作者: MANIA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:34
Commercial Weapons Research and Peacetime Weapons Research,y has thus been in existence for nearly two and half millennia, and ranks with agriculture and building as one of the oldest industries in continuous existence. Arms production became ‘industrialised’ in the nineteenth century, when modern methods of production informed by scientific understanding o作者: coagulation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:49 作者: murmur 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:01 作者: 有幫助 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 11:34
Philip A. Geis,Charles W. Jacobsents, power in the crudest form, power to do violence to others. This includes knowledge of how to make weapons, how to make the means to do violence, the means to make war and commit other violent acts. This book is about that kind of knowledge, the people who discover it, and why it is morally wro作者: Alveolar-Bone 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4982-2s, so I begin with some general remarks about weapons and about how we might define and characterise them. Here I also comment briefly on the history of weapons development. In the last two sections of the chapter I introduce the moral dimension of WR, explain why it is wrong and state the case agai作者: Hippocampus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 21:03
Paul J. Szaniszlo,James L. Harrising of a piece of cloth or hide to which two unequal strings are attached. A small shot is placed in the sling, which is then whirled about the head and one of the strings released in the direction of the target. An important innovation occurred at about 6,000 BCE, when it was found that conical sho作者: 整潔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 01:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4982-2whose ordinary soldiers, the infantry, have better weapons will win, though heavy weapons can be decisive (as they were at Syracuse and at Sedan 2,000 years later). In this chapter I will consider three episodes from the history of the firearm, the weapon that has been the standard equipment of the
