標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives; James H. Fetzer,David Shatz,George N. Schlesinger Book 1991 Springer Science+Bus [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 休耕地 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:03
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives被引頻次
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives年度引用
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives讀者反饋
書目名稱Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: aplomb 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:31
Aspects of the Theory of Definitionof definitions of special importance in relation to philosophy. Indeed, these issues are sufficiently central that a philosopher’s theory of definition comes close to qualifying as that philosopher’s conception of methodology in philosophy. There can be little doubt of its importance for philosophy today.作者: Assignment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:05
Primitive Concepts: Habits, Conventions, and Lawsge . are permitted to be defined by means of other words, which are ultimately defined by means of those original words themselves. The second — that of definitional regress — arises when new words are allowed to be introduced to define the meaning of old words, and new words for those, ..作者: 名義上 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:25 作者: 思想上升 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:25 作者: Conscientious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:00 作者: Conscientious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0 be used to identify acceptable cognitive states, thus giving us a rational basis on which to reduce cognitive diversity. Cognitive states are ones that store information about the world; for our purposes they may be thought of simply as beliefs.作者: AVERT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0al restrictions rather than sophistication. Conversely, there are important pragmatic aspects of definition which cannot be dealt with by using logical tools but rather tools borrowed from the philosophy of language.作者: milligram 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:36 作者: fulcrum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:22
Part III Food Definitions and Formulationsof definitions of special importance in relation to philosophy. Indeed, these issues are sufficiently central that a philosopher’s theory of definition comes close to qualifying as that philosopher’s conception of methodology in philosophy. There can be little doubt of its importance for philosophy today.作者: Contracture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:44 作者: Minikin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0” philosophers have sought to formulate the “right” set of necessary and sufficient conditions not only for knowledge, which was Gettier’s concern, but also for allied notions like justified belief and rational belief.. The result is a vast literature consisting largely of examples and counterexamples, and by now numbering close to 1200 items.作者: biosphere 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:58 作者: 死貓他燒焦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:50 作者: 小歌劇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:48 作者: 隱語(yǔ) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:21
Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives978-94-011-3346-3Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292 作者: Increment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:19
0166-6991 Overview: 978-94-010-5478-2978-94-011-3346-3Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292 作者: 全面 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0jection of analyticity still prevails — in that philosophers . have either joined Quine in repudiating the “analytic”/“synthetic” distinction or remained (however mutinously) silent and made no claims of analyticity.作者: neutrophils 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0ne-place predicate .) occurring in a theory .[.] is . on the basis of this theory iff the theory determines the interpretation of . as soon as the interpretations of the other concepts occurring in .[.] are fixed. More explicit, this is what, the definability of . on the basis of .[.] means.作者: Pantry 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:47
Part III Food Definitions and Formulationsspect to the construction of arguments and the centrality of arguments to the advancement of philosophy makes the nature of meaning and the character of definitions of special importance in relation to philosophy. Indeed, these issues are sufficiently central that a philosopher’s theory of definitio作者: fender 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:12 作者: 多產(chǎn)子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0jection of analyticity still prevails — in that philosophers . have either joined Quine in repudiating the “analytic”/“synthetic” distinction or remained (however mutinously) silent and made no claims of analyticity.作者: AMEND 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0neralizations. Traditional accounts of definability are often vague and obscure, however, so that it is not always clear what the word stands for. Hence, it is instructive to place definitions in a more formal framework, as we shall see. Such a maneuvre brings forth sophistication which is not pract作者: Gentry 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0ne-place predicate .) occurring in a theory .[.] is . on the basis of this theory iff the theory determines the interpretation of . as soon as the interpretations of the other concepts occurring in .[.] are fixed. More explicit, this is what, the definability of . on the basis of .[.] means.作者: 膽小鬼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:42 作者: fructose 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:13 作者: Seizure 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0ivalence of any notion in the vocabulary of physics or some other “hard science.” Various “naturalistic” accounts make use of . notions, since idealized notions are used in physics. The most sophisticated use made of idealized notions in articulating a naturalistic philosophy is by W. V. Quine. In h作者: TRUST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:54 作者: Esalate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:27
Definition in a Quinean Worldjection of analyticity still prevails — in that philosophers . have either joined Quine in repudiating the “analytic”/“synthetic” distinction or remained (however mutinously) silent and made no claims of analyticity.作者: Osteons 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:42
Towards a General Theory of Identifiabilityne-place predicate .) occurring in a theory .[.] is . on the basis of this theory iff the theory determines the interpretation of . as soon as the interpretations of the other concepts occurring in .[.] are fixed. More explicit, this is what, the definability of . on the basis of .[.] means.作者: 歡笑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:15 作者: TRAWL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:53 作者: Amendment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:47 作者: 高度贊揚(yáng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0The purpose of this paper is to show how vagueness is relevant to definition and thereby to thought experiments, the methodology of analysis, and substantive philosophical positions. I hope to achieve this goal . in the course of arguing for the main thesis: definitions must preserve borderline cases to the same extent as clear cases.作者: 顧客 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 16:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0We are not interested in whether the animal in question is a bird or not in fact, but whether it is one in law..作者: BLOT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:20
Real and Nominal DefinitionsDefining is either giving the meaning of words or other linguistic things, which is called “nominal definition” or clarifying a given meaning, which is a proposition or property or relation, by showing it to be a compound of other propositions or properties or relations, which is called “real definition”.作者: 太空 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:35 作者: Dealing 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:08
Definitions in LawWe are not interested in whether the animal in question is a bird or not in fact, but whether it is one in law..作者: 引水渠 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:08
Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives作者: overreach 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:32 作者: Ethics 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:36 作者: 單獨(dú) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:15
Definition in a Quinean Worldjection of analyticity still prevails — in that philosophers . have either joined Quine in repudiating the “analytic”/“synthetic” distinction or remained (however mutinously) silent and made no claims of analyticity.作者: Herd-Immunity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:38
Definitions and Definabilityneralizations. Traditional accounts of definability are often vague and obscure, however, so that it is not always clear what the word stands for. Hence, it is instructive to place definitions in a more formal framework, as we shall see. Such a maneuvre brings forth sophistication which is not pract作者: 使人入神 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:43
Towards a General Theory of Identifiabilityne-place predicate .) occurring in a theory .[.] is . on the basis of this theory iff the theory determines the interpretation of . as soon as the interpretations of the other concepts occurring in .[.] are fixed. More explicit, this is what, the definability of . on the basis of .[.] means.作者: insincerity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:23 作者: ELUC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:07
Rational Definitions and Defining Rationality can substantially reduce these kinds of cognitive diversity. They believe that through the process of defining key terms of moral and epistemic justification they can identify and defend principles or procedures for belief adoption, retention, and rejection. These principles and procedures can then作者: overrule 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 17:21 作者: 通情達(dá)理 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:04
