標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy; Young-chan Ro Book 2019 Springer Nature B.V. 2019 AAR.Chinese philosophy.Confucian philosoph [打印本頁] 作者: 使作嘔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:50
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy被引頻次
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy年度引用
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy讀者反饋
書目名稱Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 現(xiàn)代 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:12
Korean Neo-Confucian Thoughte and Yulgok, the most famous names in Korean Neo-Confucian thought, represented opposing sides in the celebrated Four Seven Debate concerning the origination of feelings in the mind-and-heart. As the Mongols established the new Qing dynasty in China in the seventeenth century, Korean Neo-Confucians作者: 顯赫的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:03
A Sixteenth-Century Neo-Confucian Korean Critical Response to the Chinese L, Zheng’an’s Theory of Hun. The former arose from a distinctly Korean Neo-Confucian problem of consciousness, while the latter was related to the eastward spread of the philosophy of the Ming era Chinese Cheng-Zhu scholar L. Qinshun 羅欽順 (Zheng’an 整菴, 1455–1547). By the sixteenth century, the Korean understanding of Z. Xi’s 作者: 重疊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:50 作者: CRUMB 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:06 作者: 依法逮捕 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:36 作者: 依法逮捕 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:53
The Horak Debate Concerning Human Nature and the Nature of All Other Beingsof Korean Confucians was to understand Z. Xi’s Neo-Confucianism (. 朱子學(xué)). Through numerous debates, they have analyzed, extended, clarified, and advanced Z. Xi’s Neo-Confucianism in new and delicate ways. I shall introduce the Horak debate as a typical exemplar of such invaluable works; (2) Most rese作者: 貪婪的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:13 作者: correspondent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:47 作者: CLAP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:16
A Meeting of Extremes: The Symbiosis of Confucians and Shamans were particularly favoured by women of all classes and men of lower social status than the Confucian elite who tended to look down on the shamans. Consequently, the relationship between shamanism and Confucianism has been characterized as “co-existence within conflict.”作者: Spinous-Process 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:59
2211-0275 fundamental Neo-Confucian discourses, namely the li (principle) and qi (material force) debates, to elucidate how metaphysical theories shaped the socio-political factions of the Choson Dynasty. Furthermore, is978-90-481-2933-1Series ISSN 2211-0275 Series E-ISSN 2542-8780 作者: 赦免 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:47 作者: 名詞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:07 作者: Detonate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28646-4e and Yulgok, the most famous names in Korean Neo-Confucian thought, represented opposing sides in the celebrated Four Seven Debate concerning the origination of feelings in the mind-and-heart. As the Mongols established the new Qing dynasty in China in the seventeenth century, Korean Neo-Confucians作者: 流動才波動 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47352-5n. The former arose from a distinctly Korean Neo-Confucian problem of consciousness, while the latter was related to the eastward spread of the philosophy of the Ming era Chinese Cheng-Zhu scholar L. Qinshun 羅欽順 (Zheng’an 整菴, 1455–1547). By the sixteenth century, the Korean understanding of Z. Xi’s 作者: 惰性氣體 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:34
AFM to Study Pore-Forming Proteins endeavor to form a vital harmony amongst ourselves for the purpose of enhancing the strength and scope of our shared human experience. Then, how, according to S?, we can do this through practicing soma-aesthetic methods of self-cultivation, namely, ritual propriety and aesthetic engagement with nat作者: 含鐵 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:09 作者: Cpr951 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:57 作者: CALL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:23
Jie Yang,Lukas K. Tamm,Zhifeng Shaoof Korean Confucians was to understand Z. Xi’s Neo-Confucianism (. 朱子學(xué)). Through numerous debates, they have analyzed, extended, clarified, and advanced Z. Xi’s Neo-Confucianism in new and delicate ways. I shall introduce the Horak debate as a typical exemplar of such invaluable works; (2) Most rese作者: 遭遇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:22 作者: AUGER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:38
Timothy L. Porter,Andrew G. SykesAn Array of Critiques of Buddhism”). These arguments would be met with a commensurate Buddhist response in the . (“Exposition of Orthodoxy”) by the Seon monk Gihwa (1376–433), considered by many as one of the sharpest thinkers and writers in the entire Korean Buddhist tradition. Thus, as one of the 作者: 占卜者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:56 作者: excrete 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:05
Introduction, the Cheng-Zhu school as the orthodox line of the Confucian tradition. However, Korean Neo-Confucianism emerged with a highly sophisticated level of intellectual and scholarly discourse in interpreting some fundamental Confucian ideas that moved the debate beyond the discussion in the circle of Chin作者: 蓋他為秘密 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:11 作者: 小畫像 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:56 作者: infarct 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:02
“History, Philosophy, and Spirituality of the Four-Seven Debate: The Korean Neo-Confucian Interpreta. I (Yulgok, 1536–1584), and their debaters. It played a powerful role in contributing to the distinctive development of Korean Neo-Confucianism, thereby producing the focused yet divergent interpretations of S?ngnihak (Cheng-Zhu school/philosophy; literally, “l(fā)earning of principle and human nature”作者: Mri485 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:15
A Sixteenth-Century Neo-Confucian Korean Critical Response to the Chinese L, Zheng’an’s Theory of Huons: in Yeongnam嶺南, Y. Hwang 李滉 (penname: Toegye 退溪, 1501–1571) and J. Sik 曹植 (Nammyung 南冥, 1501–1572); in Honam湖南, Y. Hang?李恒 (Iljae 一齋, 1499–1576), K. Inhoo 金麟厚 (Haseo 河西, 1510–1560), and G. Daeseung 奇大升 (Gobong 高峰, 1527–1572); and in Gyeonggi 京畿, N. Susin 盧守慎 (Sojae 穌齋, 1515–1590), Y. I 李珥 (Yulgo作者: Communicate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:14
S, Ky?ngd?k and the Rise of the Philosophy of , 氣ophy of Ki 氣.” Although S?’s philosophy is a complex synthesis of various positions, it can be regarded as a philosophy of .. S? contributed to the formation of an alternative paradigm of thought based more upon . than on . 理 within Korean neo-Confucianism. The key message that underlies S?’s philos作者: 沙發(fā) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:03 作者: surrogate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:25
Y, Yulgok’s Life and His Neo-Confucian Synthesis Yulgok was a “synthesizer” in his approach to the some fundamental issues and controversies that dominated the sixteenth century Joseon Neo-Confucianism. Some of most controversial issues that Yulgok dealt with were the relationship between “principle” or . 理 and “vital force” or ./. 氣, the famous 作者: CYN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:48
Song Siy?l: The Revival of a ,-Oriented Approach to the Interpretation of the Mindf incessant conflicts between the political parties that then existed in Korea. Some believe that the conflicts of this period were partly responsible for the delay in the development of the Chos?n Dynasty. Some scholars also characterize the seventeenth century as being flawed by the corruption of 作者: 開頭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:15
The , Movement and Confucian Philosophyctuals held prominent positions throughout this period and one of the most important activities was continuously providing philosophical justification for the social order. The Sarim as a movement and as a collective of intellectuals, had a specific historical beginning that was inextricably entangl作者: 啤酒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:54 作者: ablate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:18
Korean Yangming Learningil Toegye fiercely dismissed it as heresy. Although Yangming Learning was denounced academically and politically throughout Joseon period, there were still progressive scholars with broader interest, searching for alternative theories other than Zhu Xi’s neo-Confucianism; for example, Nam Eon-gyeong作者: 打折 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:17 作者: 牲畜欄 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:48 作者: Insensate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:28
Book 2019ry of Korea. It deals with the historical, social, political, philosophical and spiritual dimensions of Korean Confucianism, arguably the most influential intellectual tradition, ethical and religious practice, and political-ideological system in Korea. This volume analyzes the unique aspects of the作者: 機(jī)械 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:24 作者: CHYME 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:22 作者: Bph773 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:10 作者: Mediocre 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:25 作者: Indebted 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:56 作者: 改變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:34 作者: 疏遠(yuǎn)天際 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:12 作者: 泥沼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:47 作者: Licentious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:55 作者: 造反,叛亂 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:33 作者: anchor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:49
Springer Nature B.V. 2019作者: Gingivitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:04
What is Korean about Korean Confucianism?he centuries, and, as a result, Korean Confucians debated many of the same issues Chinese Confucians debated. However, that does not mean Korean Confucianism was a carbon copy of Chinese Confucianism. Koreans made Confucianism their own and felt free to use the tools Confucianism provided to address issues that were of particular interest to them.作者: Minikin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 06:22
Dao Companion to Korean Confucian Philosophy978-90-481-2933-1Series ISSN 2211-0275 Series E-ISSN 2542-8780 作者: oblique 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 11:41 作者: 彩色的蠟筆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:20 作者: 一罵死割除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 16:59
