標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Could there have been Nothing?; Against Metaphysical Geraldine Coggins Book 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Lim [打印本頁] 作者: 專家 時間: 2025-3-21 16:55
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?被引頻次
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?年度引用
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?讀者反饋
書目名稱Could there have been Nothing?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 預(yù)示 時間: 2025-3-21 23:46 作者: 平常 時間: 2025-3-22 04:07 作者: 熱烈的歡迎 時間: 2025-3-22 05:25 作者: 率直 時間: 2025-3-22 11:46
The Metaphysics of Subtraction,3) is in doubt. In the previous chapter we considered whether the premises of the subtraction argument are true or not. In this chapter I want to look critically at the underlying argumentative approach used in all versions of the subtraction argument.作者: 拍下盜公款 時間: 2025-3-22 13:35 作者: 拍下盜公款 時間: 2025-3-22 17:31
sm, the modal ontological arguments and so on. In this chapter I am drawing these two strands together in order to show how the position we hold on one of these issues affects the position we should hold on the other.作者: 極為憤怒 時間: 2025-3-22 23:56
Possible Worlds,sm, the modal ontological arguments and so on. In this chapter I am drawing these two strands together in order to show how the position we hold on one of these issues affects the position we should hold on the other.作者: 遍及 時間: 2025-3-23 02:28 作者: 獨行者 時間: 2025-3-23 05:37
Horst-Dieter Gasde,Waltraud Paul these criticisms are, as far as possible, avoided. In parallel with this I will be considering the arguments of those philosophers who disagree with metaphysical nihilism. We will see how the subtraction argument in this, its strongest form, fares against these criticisms.作者: 頂點 時間: 2025-3-23 10:58
er. What would it mean for there to be nothing at all? Which scenarios are possible and which are impossible? What’s the fundamental difference between the possible and the impossible? Is the existence of no concrete objects a real possibility? Could there have been nothing?作者: 規(guī)范要多 時間: 2025-3-23 16:28
Could There Have Been Nothing?,er. What would it mean for there to be nothing at all? Which scenarios are possible and which are impossible? What’s the fundamental difference between the possible and the impossible? Is the existence of no concrete objects a real possibility? Could there have been nothing?作者: Fretful 時間: 2025-3-23 21:42 作者: Overstate 時間: 2025-3-23 23:54 作者: 百靈鳥 時間: 2025-3-24 04:01
978-1-349-36476-3Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2010作者: FICE 時間: 2025-3-24 07:57 作者: 競選運動 時間: 2025-3-24 11:01 作者: 范例 時間: 2025-3-24 15:48 作者: PURG 時間: 2025-3-24 19:40
Metaphysical Nihilism and the Subtraction Argument,ilism has various detractors from whom Baldwin. and others wish to defend it. Their defence is the subtraction argument. According to the subtraction argument, because the world would exist if any given object in the world did not exist, so the world would exist if no objects existed at all.作者: Flatus 時間: 2025-3-25 00:58
The Metaphysics of Subtraction,3) is in doubt. In the previous chapter we considered whether the premises of the subtraction argument are true or not. In this chapter I want to look critically at the underlying argumentative approach used in all versions of the subtraction argument.作者: 肌肉 時間: 2025-3-25 06:40 作者: Hypopnea 時間: 2025-3-25 08:39 作者: Inflated 時間: 2025-3-25 14:03 作者: 殘廢的火焰 時間: 2025-3-25 16:53
ted issues: (i) What are possible words? (ii) Is there an empty possible world? In looking at the first question we are looking at the different accounts of possible worlds—Lewisian realism, ersatzism and so on. In looking at the second question I am looking at the discussions of metaphysical nihili作者: 悄悄移動 時間: 2025-3-25 21:17
Horst-Dieter Gasde,Waltraud Paulhis means looking back at the problems I have found for the nihilist in some of the previous chapters and adjusting the arguments for nihilism so that these criticisms are, as far as possible, avoided. In parallel with this I will be considering the arguments of those philosophers who disagree with 作者: 舉止粗野的人 時間: 2025-3-26 02:59 作者: 破裂 時間: 2025-3-26 05:00
Horst-Dieter Gasde,Waltraud PaulMy aim in this chapter is to look at metaphysical nihilism itself. It is important to remember that nihilism and the subtraction argument are two separate issues. In this chapter I want to find out exactly what nihilism is and what are the issues that motivate a nihilist to hold their position.作者: 有法律效應(yīng) 時間: 2025-3-26 11:27 作者: Harpoon 時間: 2025-3-26 16:24
Concreteness,My aim in this chapter is to look at metaphysical nihilism itself. It is important to remember that nihilism and the subtraction argument are two separate issues. In this chapter I want to find out exactly what nihilism is and what are the issues that motivate a nihilist to hold their position.作者: corpus-callosum 時間: 2025-3-26 20:23 作者: 遵循的規(guī)范 時間: 2025-3-26 20:59
Book 2023ie betreffen unser Dasein im Kern und gef?hrden die M?glichkeiten, heute und in Zukunft, als Gesellschaft und individuell, ein gutes Leben zu führen.?..Der Raum der Fragen, für die wir Antworten ben?tigen,?erscheint grenzenlos und das Finden des ?richtigen“ Pfades für den globalen Wandel zunehmend u作者: 星球的光亮度 時間: 2025-3-27 02:20 作者: 慟哭 時間: 2025-3-27 06:46 作者: phlegm 時間: 2025-3-27 12:19 作者: 萬神殿 時間: 2025-3-27 16:30 作者: 媽媽不開心 時間: 2025-3-27 19:51 作者: DEI 時間: 2025-3-27 22:43 作者: 不開心 時間: 2025-3-28 02:35 作者: burnish 時間: 2025-3-28 09:42
N. J. Barrowhreibung von Verantwortung für Fehlleistungen und Diffusion der Verantwortung. Auf der Grundlage der Definition von Verantwortung unterscheiden wir zwischen Verantwortung in unterschiedlichen Beziehungen und stellen Verantwortung für andere und Verantwortung für sich selbst gegenüber. Im Weiteren ri作者: Spartan 時間: 2025-3-28 12:36
