標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Communicating Popular Science; From Deficit to Demo Sarah Tinker Perrault Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers [打印本頁] 作者: 厭倦了我 時間: 2025-3-21 19:59
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science被引頻次
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science年度引用
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science讀者反饋
書目名稱Communicating Popular Science讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: GREEN 時間: 2025-3-22 00:17
Popular Science Writing: Problems and PotentialIn studying science communication, especially popular science writing, I have found that two cultures exist on either side of a divide. I speak not of the two-cultures gap between science and literature that C. P. Snow lamented in 1959, but of a gap within the ranks of those who write about scientific issues for nonspecialist readers.作者: 場所 時間: 2025-3-22 01:03 作者: Fabric 時間: 2025-3-22 05:24
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137017581democracy; history of science; Popular Science; science作者: enormous 時間: 2025-3-22 12:11
978-1-349-43713-9Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013作者: CRAFT 時間: 2025-3-22 15:27 作者: CRAFT 時間: 2025-3-22 17:47 作者: 思鄉(xiāng)病 時間: 2025-3-22 22:01
Soft Computing Methods in Human SciencesTS) in academic circles, the call for a new social contract from within science, and the call for a new model of communication from within the world of science popularization. These many sources agree with Nicholas Russell that the public ‘must be able to critique science as well as support it’ and 作者: SCORE 時間: 2025-3-23 01:38 作者: 放牧 時間: 2025-3-23 06:59
Emilio Corchado,Václav Sná?el,Dominik ?l?zakl level depicts science as separate from (and nearly always superior to) other forms of knowledge-making, demarcation work at the individual level determines who does and doesn’t have authority to talk about a particular issue. Often this determination is based on claims of expertise, with categoriz作者: saturated-fat 時間: 2025-3-23 11:19 作者: Carminative 時間: 2025-3-23 16:10 作者: dyspareunia 時間: 2025-3-23 20:28
J. Briso Becky Bell,S. Maria Celestin Vigilaeliberative orientation that invites thoughtful engagement. Nowhere is such deliberation more crucial—and nowhere are the booster and critical approaches more at odds—than in discussions of risk. The opposition between these approaches is reflected in the way that risk discourse tends to divide betw作者: Intuitive 時間: 2025-3-24 00:10 作者: 消瘦 時間: 2025-3-24 05:21 作者: AMITY 時間: 2025-3-24 08:09
A Brief History of Science Popularizationerms of the rhetorical situation, the history of science popularization is a history of a changing set of rhetors, exigences, and audiences. Understood in terms of kinds of knowledge, it is a history of shifting relationships between episteme (scientific or specialist knowledge) and doxa (public kno作者: 有效 時間: 2025-3-24 14:32
Practitioner Perspectives on their CraftTS) in academic circles, the call for a new social contract from within science, and the call for a new model of communication from within the world of science popularization. These many sources agree with Nicholas Russell that the public ‘must be able to critique science as well as support it’ and 作者: 窗簾等 時間: 2025-3-24 14:57 作者: 貞潔 時間: 2025-3-24 20:07
Expertise: Broadening the Scope of Participationl level depicts science as separate from (and nearly always superior to) other forms of knowledge-making, demarcation work at the individual level determines who does and doesn’t have authority to talk about a particular issue. Often this determination is based on claims of expertise, with categoriz作者: Entirety 時間: 2025-3-25 03:12
Ethos: Establishing Relationships with Readersscience and others arenas in civil society, and Chapter 6 looked at how individual expertise is constructed as a social category. While both have important implications for how texts invite readers to engage with science neither explicitly addressed the roles of the writer and the reader. This chapt作者: meditation 時間: 2025-3-25 03:35
Rhetorical Orientations: Inviting Reader Engagement looks at the ways that texts signal readers directly about how to engage with science-related issues by presenting, or not presenting, certain kinds of information and arguments. Depending on how texts pose problems, they may invite readers to be passive recipients of knowledge, or to be engaged co作者: 吹牛大王 時間: 2025-3-25 09:54
Technocracy and Democracy: Talking about Riskeliberative orientation that invites thoughtful engagement. Nowhere is such deliberation more crucial—and nowhere are the booster and critical approaches more at odds—than in discussions of risk. The opposition between these approaches is reflected in the way that risk discourse tends to divide betw作者: Conjuction 時間: 2025-3-25 12:22 作者: cunning 時間: 2025-3-25 18:22 作者: Outmoded 時間: 2025-3-25 21:55 作者: 驕傲 時間: 2025-3-26 00:22 作者: 變白 時間: 2025-3-26 07:14
Ethos: Establishing Relationships with Readerser and the next do so. Chapter 8 will examine the kinds of relationships popular science texts invite readers to take toward scientific issues, but first this chapter looks at how writers create ethos and construct personas in popular science texts.作者: Barter 時間: 2025-3-26 09:03 作者: 浪費物質(zhì) 時間: 2025-3-26 14:06 作者: Anterior 時間: 2025-3-26 18:00 作者: 合群 時間: 2025-3-27 00:45 作者: 誘騙 時間: 2025-3-27 04:25
Rhetorical Orientations: Inviting Reader Engagementof information and arguments. Depending on how texts pose problems, they may invite readers to be passive recipients of knowledge, or to be engaged coparticipants in figuring out what the knowledge means, or (usually) in some middle ground between these poles.作者: OTTER 時間: 2025-3-27 08:03 作者: 秘方藥 時間: 2025-3-27 12:47 作者: atopic-rhinitis 時間: 2025-3-27 16:22 作者: 同來核對 時間: 2025-3-27 19:57 作者: META 時間: 2025-3-28 01:16 作者: osculate 時間: 2025-3-28 04:10
Theoretical and Analytical Framework dubbed ‘Realist—Skepticism’ (Bauer et al., ‘Public’). Next it discusses rhetorical genre theory as a way to understand texts as discursive objects, then it describes the specific analytic framework I use to identify relevant characteristics of popular science writing in specific texts. Finally, it explains my text selections.作者: 粗俗人 時間: 2025-3-28 06:54
Practitioner Perspectives on their Craftnvestments and responses to science, correct misrepresentations of science by nonscientific pressure groups, and expose over-enthusiastic manipulation of the media and other unethical behaviours by scientists themselves’ (p. xvi).作者: 會議 時間: 2025-3-28 11:54
Boundary Work: Presenting Science in Context, and between readers and science (Chapter 8). The final application chapter draws together strands from Chapters 5–8 in a discussion of applying CUSP (Critical Understanding of Science in Public) principles to controversial areas of science and questions of risk.作者: Tonometry 時間: 2025-3-28 15:12 作者: 秘傳 時間: 2025-3-28 22:10 作者: Esophagitis 時間: 2025-3-29 02:18 作者: THROB 時間: 2025-3-29 06:18
K. Anuraj,S. S. Poorna,C. Saikumarer and the next do so. Chapter 8 will examine the kinds of relationships popular science texts invite readers to take toward scientific issues, but first this chapter looks at how writers create ethos and construct personas in popular science texts.
