標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Common Law – Civil Law; The Great Divide? Nicoletta Bersier,Christoph Bezemek,Frederick Scha Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th [打印本頁] 作者: 相持不下 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:06
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law被引頻次
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law年度引用
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law讀者反饋
書目名稱Common Law – Civil Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 透明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:31
Civil Law, Common Law, and the Data of Jurisprudence,eeking to understand the nature of law itself, or even, as some would put it, the nature of the concept of law, we need to have some idea of something in the world that we are examining. That is, we need to start with the . that supports jurisprudential theory. So-called legal pluralists claim that 作者: expunge 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:09
,The Chain Novel and Its Normative Fine Structure in Civil Law and Common Law: ,, , and Law’s Normath respect to civil law. Dworkin explained law as a specific genre of literature—the chain novel—where several authors collaborate in writing a novel and each author builds her chapter on the previous chapters in the chain by creatively interpreting them. Brandom built on Dworkin’s chain novel of law作者: BUCK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:12
The Civil Law as the Foundation of the Common Law: Roscoe Pound Considers the Origins of the Commonretation, and law-application, they also differ in their methods of reasoning and in their use of authority. This chapter focuses on these differences in reasoning and treatment of authority. It does so, however, not so much as an end in itself, but as an entry into aspects of the thinking of Roscoe作者: 征服 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:42 作者: 外星人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:09 作者: 外星人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:45
Profiling the American Judge: A Comparative Argument About Ideological Conceptions of Judging,essay pursues the opposite emphasis. It explores some traits of the ideological conception of judging typically associated with the American culture so as to show that remarkable differences in the judicial practice between systems may actually persist regardless of the similarities on the instituti作者: 想象 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:37 作者: 規(guī)章 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:16 作者: LOPE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:32 作者: 違抗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:37
Common Law – Civil Law978-3-030-87718-7Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315 作者: Wordlist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:55
Palgrave Studies in Economic Historyessay pursues the opposite emphasis. It explores some traits of the ideological conception of judging typically associated with the American culture so as to show that remarkable differences in the judicial practice between systems may actually persist regardless of the similarities on the institutional plane.作者: burnish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:58
Profiling the American Judge: A Comparative Argument About Ideological Conceptions of Judging,essay pursues the opposite emphasis. It explores some traits of the ideological conception of judging typically associated with the American culture so as to show that remarkable differences in the judicial practice between systems may actually persist regardless of the similarities on the institutional plane.作者: 闡明 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:09 作者: FIG 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:01
978-3-030-87720-0The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl作者: BIDE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 09:56 作者: 嚴(yán)厲批評(píng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:17
Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/230289.jpg作者: TAIN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:02
Capitalism as a Transitional Society,edent set by judges in deciding cases before them, the latter being founded on a set of rules expected to govern the decisions of those serving as a mouthpiece in applying them. Perceived in this manner, common law and civil law differ as to the (main) source(s) of law, about who is to create, about作者: 祖?zhèn)髫?cái)產(chǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:36 作者: Stress-Fracture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:22 作者: fatty-streak 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:03
,China’s Whole Process People’s Democracy,retation, and law-application, they also differ in their methods of reasoning and in their use of authority. This chapter focuses on these differences in reasoning and treatment of authority. It does so, however, not so much as an end in itself, but as an entry into aspects of the thinking of Roscoe作者: Decimate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:07
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403913876urprisingly, the opposite holds true for the relation between originalism and positivism; their relation and, indeed, their complementarity remain, to this day, largely unexplored. Although originalism and positivism have been the dominant models in the US and in Europe, they have never been an obje作者: 苦澀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1622-8 . and . systems share a partially common tradition in what concerns the methodological relevance of ., thus conferring a specific normatively constitutive meaning to the roles played by ., and, within it, ., in .. Establishing a dialogue between . and . systems, and, within it, comparing the roles 作者: 身體萌芽 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:03
Palgrave Studies in Economic Historyessay pursues the opposite emphasis. It explores some traits of the ideological conception of judging typically associated with the American culture so as to show that remarkable differences in the judicial practice between systems may actually persist regardless of the similarities on the instituti作者: FLIC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:28 作者: Mast-Cell 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:05 作者: Vulnerary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:32 作者: vertebrate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:31 作者: BLA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 12:56
,A Problem of Credibility, 1964–85,For Joseph Raz, the hierarchical structure of legal orders may be described more appropriately using?a tree diagram than the model of a pyramid of norms. This view is tested in this chapter, paying particular attention to the differences between civil law and common law.作者: trigger 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:07 作者: 小畫像 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:52
Tree Diagram or Pyramid of Norms?,For Joseph Raz, the hierarchical structure of legal orders may be described more appropriately using?a tree diagram than the model of a pyramid of norms. This view is tested in this chapter, paying particular attention to the differences between civil law and common law.作者: heterogeneous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:38
1572-4395 s approaching the topic against the background of different This book offers an in-depth analysis of the differences between common law and civil law systems from various theoretical perspectives. Written by a global network of experts, it explores the topic against the background of a variety of le作者: overshadow 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:21 作者: 表示向前 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0664-0nary approaches, the civil law tradition appears to be still committed to the “science of law”. It is argued that, in the context of the latter, the moment of transcendence is the preserve of the philosophy of law.作者: 品嘗你的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:39
Introduction,outhpiece in applying them. Perceived in this manner, common law and civil law differ as to the (main) source(s) of law, about who is to create, about who is (merely) to draw from them, about whether the law works itself pure each step of the way or whether the law’s purity may only be tarnished when confronted with a contingent set of facts.作者: IST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:10 作者: Insensate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:54
Book 2022global network of experts, it explores the topic against the background of a variety of legal traditions..Common law and civil law are typically presented as antagonistic players on a field claimed by diverse legal systems: the former being based on precedent set by judges in deciding cases before t作者: 極端的正確性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1622-8of . and . in adjudication—therefore, debating the construction of judicial adjudication as . and as .—, the essay proposes an understanding of . not only as an effective ., but also—and mostly—as a methodologically constitutive juridical criterion, emphasizing a normatively constitutive . (.).作者: 口訣法 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:15 作者: DOSE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:29 作者: 過份 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:45
Is China a Continental-Law Country?,luence. It offers the characterization of a hybrid nature of China’s legal system, which is neither common nor continental. Thus, it concludes that Chinese law blends together the socialist tradition and Western elements, combining both continental and Anglo-American with ancient factors.作者: Limpid 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55203-9ever it exists are so consistent that such generalizations are indeed possible. This essay explores these questions, with a focus on whether the differences between civil and common law legal systems are, or are not, so great as to impede jurisprudential inquiry.作者: macabre 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:05
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403913876, in principle, originalism and positivism overlap and, to a very considerable extent, might complement each other. On the other, I will argue that, whereas many originalists are inclined to endorse legal positivism at the justificatory level, the new versions of legal positivism defended by Raz, Marmor, and Shapiro reject originalism.作者: GEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 06:31
The Omnipotence of Organisationecognition to the international case. It will be argued here that Kelsen’s theory of international law is better placed to provide the missing explanation of why the existence puzzle continues to be relevant.作者: CAGE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 08:42 作者: DAMN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:24 作者: genesis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:48 作者: 龍卷風(fēng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:26 作者: 斜坡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:29
