派博傳思國際中心

標題: Titlebook: Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics; Steven G. Medema Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New Yo [打印本頁]

作者: 雜技演員    時間: 2025-3-21 19:27
書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics被引頻次




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics年度引用




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics讀者反饋




書目名稱Coasean Economics Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名





作者: decipher    時間: 2025-3-21 21:33
The Coasean Tangle: The Nature of the Firm and the Problem of Historical Specificity,and materials — takes place. The firm is thus seemingly ubiquitous and pre-eminent throughout all civilised human history. The firm embraces all productive activity, from the slave sweating under the whip, to the contract knitter of scarves by the fireside, and to the loving husband preparing breakf
作者: defuse    時間: 2025-3-22 03:17
Property Rights, Transaction Costs, and Coase: One More Time, and make one more attempt to clear the air and make the notion of transaction costs operational. The proposed definition clarifies the Coase Theorem, draws attention to its importance, and helps to defend it against some standard criticisms. Further, the definition helps to answer sticky questions
作者: Fallibility    時間: 2025-3-22 05:49
Examples of Modern Screw Compressor Designs,and materials — takes place. The firm is thus seemingly ubiquitous and pre-eminent throughout all civilised human history. The firm embraces all productive activity, from the slave sweating under the whip, to the contract knitter of scarves by the fireside, and to the loving husband preparing breakf
作者: 諂媚于人    時間: 2025-3-22 10:09

作者: 通便    時間: 2025-3-22 13:03

作者: 通便    時間: 2025-3-22 17:48

作者: 起波瀾    時間: 2025-3-22 22:12
Book 1998Whether this response was idiosyncratic or not, I do not know; I expect not. Part of this type of reaction can no doubt be explained by the fact that Coase has often been characterized as an economist who wrote only two significant or influential papers: "The Nature of the Firm" (1937) and "The Prob
作者: eustachian-tube    時間: 2025-3-23 05:27
The Three Great Puzzles of the Firm,991, p. 23]). Finally, noting that “nothing could be more diverse than the actual transactions which take place in our modern world,” Coase sought to explain how the attributes of transactions affect the relative costs of internal and market organization (1937 [1991, pp. 24–25]).
作者: 征稅    時間: 2025-3-23 09:22
The Coase Theorem and Some Puzzles on the Tort/Contract Boundary,a reality check. In this paper I want to focus on two such instances. In the first instance, parties contract around a tort rule which appears efficient. In the second, parties fail to contract around a tort rule which appears inefficient. In both instances I will sketch out some arguments which might reconcile these observations.
作者: Cardiac-Output    時間: 2025-3-23 09:54
,Coase, Communism and the “Black Box” of Soviet-Type Economies,ugh he was persuaded of the power of the market economy to coordinate the plans of diverse individuals in society, the proposition left Coase with a new question which ate away at him. If the market is so efficient and powerful in organizing our affairs, then why were there business organizations?
作者: Temporal-Lobe    時間: 2025-3-23 14:14

作者: buoyant    時間: 2025-3-23 21:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90154-7act, Coase quite clearly identifies his own views with those of Alfred Marshall, and, given the important role played by Marshall in the establishment of the British approach to doing economics in the early 20th century, it becomes less surprising that Coase’s views coincide so closely with this British tradition.
作者: 愛國者    時間: 2025-3-24 01:03

作者: DEFT    時間: 2025-3-24 04:34
Ronald Coase, the British Tradition, and the Future of Economic Method,act, Coase quite clearly identifies his own views with those of Alfred Marshall, and, given the important role played by Marshall in the establishment of the British approach to doing economics in the early 20th century, it becomes less surprising that Coase’s views coincide so closely with this British tradition.
作者: 不規(guī)則的跳動    時間: 2025-3-24 09:24
The Good Old Coase Theorem and the Good Old Chicago School: A Comment on Zerbe and Medema, other, finding such an approach tedious, retires to the study and the blackboard. In all his work from the 1930s onward Coase has attacked this rationalist tradition of what he calls “blackboard economics,” as for example Jeremy Bentham, or A. C. Pigou, or Paul Samuelson, or Richard Posner.
作者: pericardium    時間: 2025-3-24 13:35

作者: 最有利    時間: 2025-3-24 15:53

作者: 一再遛    時間: 2025-3-24 19:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36304-0ll exchange rights so as to move them to their highest-valued uses, irrespective of their original assignment, and (ii) Pigouvian remedies (taxes, subsidies, and regulations) are unnecessary for treating externality problems, since externalities will be costlessly internalized through the aforementioned market bargaining process.
作者: LIEN    時間: 2025-3-24 23:21
Grid Generation of Screw Machine Geometry,dited rather than peer reviewed. Ensuring that one’s research gets published is rarely difficult for the American law professor. Some journal, at some school or another, is likely to take what one has written.
作者: Amplify    時間: 2025-3-25 04:12

作者: Cytokines    時間: 2025-3-25 07:47
Ronald Coase on Economic Policy Analysis: Framework and Implications,ll exchange rights so as to move them to their highest-valued uses, irrespective of their original assignment, and (ii) Pigouvian remedies (taxes, subsidies, and regulations) are unnecessary for treating externality problems, since externalities will be costlessly internalized through the aforementioned market bargaining process.
作者: 蚊帳    時間: 2025-3-25 13:21

作者: 合乎習(xí)俗    時間: 2025-3-25 18:45

作者: 教義    時間: 2025-3-25 23:04

作者: Anecdote    時間: 2025-3-26 03:57
New Transculturalisms, 1400–1800ugh he was persuaded of the power of the market economy to coordinate the plans of diverse individuals in society, the proposition left Coase with a new question which ate away at him. If the market is so efficient and powerful in organizing our affairs, then why were there business organizations?
作者: MURAL    時間: 2025-3-26 06:20

作者: Obverse    時間: 2025-3-26 11:09
https://doi.org/10.1007/b137216nomics (Williamson, 1975; 1985) or the economics of organization more broadly (Milgrom and Roberts, 1992), the Coasean literature of the last 20 years has indeed focused precisely on the comparative transaction costs of alternative organizational structures, including, paradigmatically, the choice between firms and markets.
作者: Commentary    時間: 2025-3-26 15:11

作者: chandel    時間: 2025-3-26 18:22

作者: 擁護者    時間: 2025-3-27 00:42
The Coasean Tangle: The Nature of the Firm and the Problem of Historical Specificity, Frank Knight (1921) and Ronald Coase (1937). It concerns the definition and historical specificity of the firm itself. Most writers in this area seem to assume that “the firm” is essentially . organization devoted to the production of goods or services. With such a broad and general definition of t
作者: Soliloquy    時間: 2025-3-27 01:22
The Three Great Puzzles of the Firm,nd most basic, is what is a firm, or more precisely, what are the properties that distinguish organization within a firm from market exchange? The second concerns the determinants of firm size or “Why,” in Coase’s words, “does the entrepreneur not organize one less transaction or one more?” (1937 [1
作者: Ganglion-Cyst    時間: 2025-3-27 07:06

作者: 晚來的提名    時間: 2025-3-27 10:40

作者: 蒼白    時間: 2025-3-27 17:29
Property Rights, Transaction Costs, and Coase: One More Time,cture on these subjects. Certainly most microeconomic textbooks treat all three topics to one extent or another, and there are articles with these words in their title if not ad infinitum then at least ad nauseam. Still, there often remains some confusion in both the texts and the articles. as to wh
作者: 都相信我的話    時間: 2025-3-27 20:43
Revisiting Legal Realism: The Law, Economics, and Organization Perspective,perhaps the most important development in legal thought in the last quarter century” (Posner, 1986, p. xix), is dramatic. That the one foundered while the other flourished is explained in large measure by the absence of an intellectual framework for Legal Realism and the use by law and economics of
作者: 等待    時間: 2025-3-27 23:13
Ronald Coase on Economic Policy Analysis: Framework and Implications,oase theorem has powerful implications for questions of legal-economic policy because it implies that (i) law does not really matter, since parties will exchange rights so as to move them to their highest-valued uses, irrespective of their original assignment, and (ii) Pigouvian remedies (taxes, sub
作者: liaison    時間: 2025-3-28 02:30

作者: Complement    時間: 2025-3-28 10:05

作者: 別炫耀    時間: 2025-3-28 11:55
Ronald Coase, the British Tradition, and the Future of Economic Method,to the late nineteenth and early twentieth century British tradition. To demonstrate this, we use the Appendix of this paper to juxtapose Coase’s views on method with those reflected in W.A.S. Hewins’ essay on economics in the classic 1911 edition of the .. For all intents and purposes Coase’s views
作者: 表被動    時間: 2025-3-28 18:34
The Good Old Coase Theorem and the Good Old Chicago School: A Comment on Zerbe and Medema, and economics as it has developed in, say, Richard Posner’s work and as it has been absorbed into the mainstream of economics is not the same thing as what might be called a “Coasean” approach. Coase and Posner, though often treated as identical, represent different views on how to conduct economic
作者: 敲詐    時間: 2025-3-28 20:25
The Problem of Social Coase: Between Regulation and Free Market in Economic Methodology,odological thought is beginning to be explored (see Medema 1994, M?ki 1994a, 1994b, 1994c, and Foss 1994), but much more needs to be done. The present paper attempts to contribute to this literature by showing that there is an interesting tension in Coase’s methodological thought about the nature of
作者: angina-pectoris    時間: 2025-3-29 01:32

作者: harrow    時間: 2025-3-29 07:02
Grid Generation of Screw Machine Geometry,perhaps the most important development in legal thought in the last quarter century” (Posner, 1986, p. xix), is dramatic. That the one foundered while the other flourished is explained in large measure by the absence of an intellectual framework for Legal Realism and the use by law and economics of the powerful framework of neoclassical economics.
作者: Heterodoxy    時間: 2025-3-29 07:53
Recent Economic Thoughthttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/228718.jpg
作者: NICE    時間: 2025-3-29 14:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/b137216le used.” The landscape of economic thought changed significantly in the years that followed, and a large body of literature quickly emerged that not only “used” but in many ways sprang from Coase’s paper. The basic insight is now well known. In addition to production costs of the usual sort, one mu
作者: 消散    時間: 2025-3-29 16:16
Examples of Modern Screw Compressor Designs, Frank Knight (1921) and Ronald Coase (1937). It concerns the definition and historical specificity of the firm itself. Most writers in this area seem to assume that “the firm” is essentially . organization devoted to the production of goods or services. With such a broad and general definition of t
作者: 下船    時間: 2025-3-29 23:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36304-0nd most basic, is what is a firm, or more precisely, what are the properties that distinguish organization within a firm from market exchange? The second concerns the determinants of firm size or “Why,” in Coase’s words, “does the entrepreneur not organize one less transaction or one more?” (1937 [1
作者: 油氈    時間: 2025-3-30 01:49
Ahmed Kovacevic,Nikola Stosic,Ian Smith uncomprehending world. Naturally, the parent, even one who refers to its little one as an “argument,” is not primarily to blame: “I do not believe that a failure of exposition is the main reason why economists have found my argument so difficult to assimilate” (Coase, 1988, p. 1). Perhaps the fault
作者: cunning    時間: 2025-3-30 07:58

作者: dialect    時間: 2025-3-30 08:15

作者: Misgiving    時間: 2025-3-30 14:58
Grid Generation of Screw Machine Geometry,perhaps the most important development in legal thought in the last quarter century” (Posner, 1986, p. xix), is dramatic. That the one foundered while the other flourished is explained in large measure by the absence of an intellectual framework for Legal Realism and the use by law and economics of




歡迎光臨 派博傳思國際中心 (http://pjsxioz.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.5
高碑店市| 阿勒泰市| 商丘市| 密山市| 江西省| 新闻| 喜德县| 鹤壁市| 正安县| 承德市| 梓潼县| 读书| 阿拉尔市| 漯河市| 靖远县| 伽师县| 大城县| 金山区| 四会市| 八宿县| 安吉县| 土默特右旗| 双牌县| 本溪| 广安市| 汉阴县| 洛南县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 万盛区| 美姑县| 尚义县| 祥云县| 庄浪县| 灵丘县| 堆龙德庆县| 普兰店市| 雅安市| 张掖市| 元阳县| 玉门市| 绥中县|