標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization; Talking Tomorrow’s T Judith Kreuter Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: BULK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:28
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization年度引用
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: IVORY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:09
Judith KreuterExamines the implications of academic framing for political decision-making.Provides an account of how to operationalize insights from Science and Technology Studies in empirical political analysis.Co作者: 本能 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:35
Springer Climatehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/227597.jpg作者: exquisite 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:24
Rhetoric in British Politics and Societyscusses ‘wickedness’ in the sense of the non-existence of a clearly right solution, with regards to both challenges—anthropogenic climate change on the one hand and Climate Engineering as a potential measure to address this problem on the other. Kreuter explores the empirical case of the current aca作者: vasospasm 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:46
Rhetoric in British Politics and Societyree, so far only in the minds of people and the calculations for climate models. As well as outlining the ideas on which these approaches are based which date back decades, in some cases centuries, the chapter outlines the currently few political discussions of CE at the margins of climate policy. K作者: contradict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:50 作者: contradict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:14
Erratum to: Rhetoric in Neoliberalism,mes voiced by academic actors coincided with the subsequent development and eventual use of the emerging technology. Kreuter highlights similarities as well as differences between the development of nuclear technology and the current discussion of CE approaches before identifying thematic security, 作者: rheumatology 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:59 作者: eucalyptus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39850-1irical analysis of a sample of peer-reviewed academic journal articles from all disciplines. While framing is found to be rare across the sample, frames appearing in the sample are highly diverse. Furthermore, Kreuter highlights that many documents present a combination of counteracting frames which作者: ferment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:27
Rhetorical Deductions in Sociological Texts, and subsequent decision-making in the current situation of little dedicated political discussion of these approaches. As well as discussing the high diversity of framing in the academic discussion of CE, Kreuter explores possibilities of extending the scope of attempts to understand future decision作者: gregarious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60340-3Frame Theory in Political Research; Climate Technology in International Relations; Qualitative and Qua作者: 吹牛者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:56 作者: Coeval 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:14 作者: Aggregate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:58 作者: 修飾 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:43 作者: NADIR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:47
,The Early Discussion of Nuclear Weapons Technology in the 1930s and 1940s—Illustrating the Theoretimes voiced by academic actors coincided with the subsequent development and eventual use of the emerging technology. Kreuter highlights similarities as well as differences between the development of nuclear technology and the current discussion of CE approaches before identifying thematic security, 作者: Range-Of-Motion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:38 作者: homeostasis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:32
,The Academic Framing of Climate Engineering—A Diverse Field Presenting Interesting Landmarks,irical analysis of a sample of peer-reviewed academic journal articles from all disciplines. While framing is found to be rare across the sample, frames appearing in the sample are highly diverse. Furthermore, Kreuter highlights that many documents present a combination of counteracting frames which作者: 協(xié)定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:21 作者: SENT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:38 作者: aggrieve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:32 作者: Infect 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:15
2352-0698 ce and Technology Studies in empirical political analysis.Co. .This book examines the academic discussion on climate engineering as an instance of politicization – as a subject of deliberation and decision-making. It traces legitimizing and delegitimizing frames applied to discuss both Carbon Dioxid作者: Crater 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:46 作者: Subjugate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:44
Rhetoric in British Politics and Societyich date back decades, in some cases centuries, the chapter outlines the currently few political discussions of CE at the margins of climate policy. Kreuter discusses this peculiar state of affairs and explores the relevance of social construction in this context based on the state of the art of social science analysis of CE.作者: 觀(guān)點(diǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 23:41
David W. Seitz,Amanda Berardi Tennantessing CE approaches. Focusing on sampling and manual text analysis, Kreuter also points out possibilities for follow-up studies based on automated content analysis. The chapter concludes with an overview of eight ideal-type legitimizing or delegitimizing frames of security, complexity, economy and appropriateness.作者: 幻影 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:44
,Talking Tomorrow’s Technology, Framing Political Choice?,e one hand and Climate Engineering as a potential measure to address this problem on the other. Kreuter explores the empirical case of the current academic discussion of Climate Engineering as an instance of politicization which offers the opportunity to open up the topic to deliberation and political decision-making.作者: 臥虎藏龍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:11
,An Idea—And More Than an Idea: Climate Engineering in Research and Decision-Making,ich date back decades, in some cases centuries, the chapter outlines the currently few political discussions of CE at the margins of climate policy. Kreuter discusses this peculiar state of affairs and explores the relevance of social construction in this context based on the state of the art of social science analysis of CE.作者: Pillory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:22 作者: 脫落 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:23
Book 2021g the future roles of these approaches in global climate policy. This book demonstrates how insights from science and technology studies can be operationalized in empirical political analysis. It appeals to scholars in both political science and environmental science who are interested in climate change policy-making and the science–policy nexus..作者: 痛打 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:03
Rhetoric in British Politics and Society this chapter explores the role of academic communications in the construction of meaning of Climate Engineering. The theoretical construct provides a tool to analyze both legitimizing and delegitimizing moves of meaning-construction through language along four ideal-type frame themes, namely security, complexity, economy and appropriateness.作者: peptic-ulcer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:36 作者: ROOF 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39850-1 provide a curious tension inside the individual document. Kreuter concludes the chapter by discussing the roles of interdisciplinarity and the discussion across various CE approaches for academic framing of CE.作者: 骨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 09:12 作者: 外露 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:15
,Ideas and Objects, Meaning and Causation—Frame Analysis from a Modernist Social Constructivism Pers this chapter explores the role of academic communications in the construction of meaning of Climate Engineering. The theoretical construct provides a tool to analyze both legitimizing and delegitimizing moves of meaning-construction through language along four ideal-type frame themes, namely security, complexity, economy and appropriateness.作者: 撕裂皮肉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:34
,The Early Discussion of Nuclear Weapons Technology in the 1930s and 1940s—Illustrating the Theoreticomplexity, economy and appropriateness frames in the academic discussion on nuclear technology. Concluding by broadening the perspective, Kreuter points out a multitude of factors which bore on the eventual outcome of use of nuclear weapons technology.作者: 量被毀壞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:43 作者: Peak-Bone-Mass 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:23
,Climate Engineering as an Instance of Politicization—A Diversity of Frames in the Academic Discussi-making concerning CE. Kreuter concludes by considering implications for climate policy, looking at ways in which the diversity of academic framing might be preserved in academic information for political decision-making.
