標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Causation, Coherence and Concepts; A Collection of Essa Wolfgang Spohn Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Causation.Formal [打印本頁] 作者: Mottled 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:17
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts被引頻次
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts年度引用
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts讀者反饋
書目名稱Causation, Coherence and Concepts讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 粘連 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:51 作者: 外來 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:04
Causal Laws are Objectifications of Inductive Schemes can be objectified under certain illuminating conditions. Hence, my final answer is that a causal law is a proposition which can be true or false and has the logical form of a law of succession, and with which a particular inductive behavior (= ranking function) is uniquely associated via the above作者: 混雜人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:01
A Reason for Explanation: Explanations Provide Stable Reasons scientific understanding. So, the argument is completed by the observation that, on the basis of the given explications, having an explanation is (almost) equivalent to knowing an ultimately stable reason (section 9.5).作者: demote 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:19
The Character of Color Terms: A Materialist Viewming that our context world is presumably such that (5) the statement “. appears red to . iff . causes . to be in a certain neural state .” is necessarily true and (6) the statement “. is red iff the reflectance spectrum of the surface of . is of a certain kind .” is necessarily true as well.作者: climax 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:19
The Intentional Versus the Propositional Structure of Contents (section 16.4), and a third theoretical one alluding to a deep principle of philosophical psychology (which I call the Invariance Principle) (section 16.5). Section 16.6 concludes with some skeptical remarks on the primacy of sentence over word meaning.作者: climax 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:56
Zentrale Ergebnisse der Studie,hat might explain many problems and confusions concerning probabilistic causation. Section 2.6 finally resolves the conflict by arguing that the structural approach assuming transitivity yields the most general theory of causation and by showing under which conditions causal chains conform to the ot作者: OCTO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10954-9 can be objectified under certain illuminating conditions. Hence, my final answer is that a causal law is a proposition which can be true or false and has the logical form of a law of succession, and with which a particular inductive behavior (= ranking function) is uniquely associated via the above作者: Brochure 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:33
Versicherung und Risikoforschung scientific understanding. So, the argument is completed by the observation that, on the basis of the given explications, having an explanation is (almost) equivalent to knowing an ultimately stable reason (section 9.5).作者: 能得到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10958-7ming that our context world is presumably such that (5) the statement “. appears red to . iff . causes . to be in a certain neural state .” is necessarily true and (6) the statement “. is red iff the reflectance spectrum of the surface of . is of a certain kind .” is necessarily true as well.作者: conformity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:05 作者: synchronous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:08
Book 2009 The papers are tightly connected. I feel they might be even read as unfolding a program, though this program was never fully clear in my mind and still isn’t. In the Introduction I attempt to describe what this program might be, thus drawing a reconstructed red thread, or rather two red threads, th作者: extemporaneous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:45
0068-0346 ry which equals that of probability theory.Offers valuable iIn this collection I present 16 of my, I feel, more substantial papers on theoretical philosophy, 12 as originally published, one co-authored with Ulrike Haas-Spohn (Chapter14), one (Chapter 15) that was a brief conference commentary, but i作者: 指耕作 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10954-9 theories (section 4.4). But there is also a crucial difference (section 4.3): Glymour et al. take causal dependencies as primitive and argue them to behave like Bayesian nets under wide circumstances. By contrast, I argue the behavior of Bayesian nets to ultimately be the defining characteristic of causal dependence.作者: 血統(tǒng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:15 作者: Cursory 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:01 作者: 不整齊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:30
Causation: An Alternativeis basis, section 3.4 constructs a rigorous theory of direct and indirect causation that, as section 3.5 argues, successfully deals with cases of symmetric overdetermination and of preemption by cutting and by trumping. Section 3.6 finally indicates how the account’s profound epistemic relativization induced by ranking theory can be undone.作者: Affiliation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:35 作者: extemporaneous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:02
Two Coherence Principlesature of propositions as objects of belief (section 10.5), nor in a Kantian way from self-consciousness (section 10.6). Rather, I propose a fairly rigorous way to infer them from an even more fundamental rationality principle of non-dogmatism and an elementary theory of perception (section 10.7).作者: hair-bulb 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:58
Zentrale Ergebnisse der Studie,is basis, section 3.4 constructs a rigorous theory of direct and indirect causation that, as section 3.5 argues, successfully deals with cases of symmetric overdetermination and of preemption by cutting and by trumping. Section 3.6 finally indicates how the account’s profound epistemic relativization induced by ranking theory can be undone.作者: Ingratiate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:55 作者: 難取悅 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:21 作者: Ancillary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:42
Anwendungen der Laplace-Transformation,ionalization) that encompass revision and contraction as conceived in AGM theory (section 1.5), and proves that conditional independence w.r.t. OCFs satisfies the so-called graphoid axioms (section 1.6). The amazing parallel to probability theory is discussed in section 1.7. Section 1.8 concludes with a number of comparative remarks.作者: 分開 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:48 作者: 溫和女孩 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:20 作者: 恃強(qiáng)凌弱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:21 作者: Insulin 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:13 作者: preeclampsia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:29 作者: 領(lǐng)先 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:39
,Anhang: Tabellen und Erl?uterungen,the confirmation of possible laws and that enumerative induction is equivalent to such an account. Section 7.6 concludes with some remarks about the apriority of lawfulness or the uniformity of nature.作者: troponins 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:15
Risikomessung in der Bankpraxis,in section 11.5) supports coherentism as opposed to foundationalism and at the same time provides an answer to skepticism about the external world. Section 11.6 concludes by depriving the foundationalists even of their last resort.作者: 微生物 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:47 作者: GUILT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:49
Enumerative Induction and Lawlikenessthe confirmation of possible laws and that enumerative induction is equivalent to such an account. Section 7.6 concludes with some remarks about the apriority of lawfulness or the uniformity of nature.作者: 要求比…更好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:20 作者: STALL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:02 作者: indicate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5474-7Causation; Formal epistemology; Proposition; coherence; concepts; epistemology; knowledge; language; metaphy作者: 注意到 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:06
978-94-007-8705-6Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009作者: 新娘 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:04 作者: 沒收 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:34
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/222642.jpg作者: ORE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:20 作者: 陳列 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:24 作者: adequate-intake 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:50 作者: MIME 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:37 作者: separate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:12 作者: Foam-Cells 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:04 作者: Surgeon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10954-9the core of both is that causal graphs are Bayesian nets (section 4.2). The similarity extends to the treatment of actions or interventions in the two theories (section 4.4). But there is also a crucial difference (section 4.3): Glymour et al. take causal dependencies as primitive and argue them to 作者: FUSC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:51 作者: Phenothiazines 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 19:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10954-9n various forms and dominated the discussion about lawlikeness in the last decades. Likewise, the issue about . conditions is essentially about how we epistemically deal with exceptions. Hence, ranking theory with its resources of defeasible reasoning seems ideally suited to explicate these points i作者: 盡忠 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:12
,Anhang: Tabellen und Erl?uterungen,n, the confirmation of a law by its positive instances, which may indeed take various schemes (section 7.3). It gives a ranking theoretic explication of a possible law or a nomological hypothesis (section 7.4). It proves that such schemes of enumerative induction uniquely correspond to mixtures of s作者: 放大 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:30 作者: 車床 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:19 作者: intangibility 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:02
Risikomessung im Binomialmodell,of the notion of coherence as it is used in the current epistemological discussion. After discussing their epistemological setting (sections 10.2-3), the paper considers four ways of establishing these principles. They may be inferred neither from enumerative induction (section 10.4), nor from the n作者: cardiovascular 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:33 作者: 不妥協(xié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:01 作者: grudging 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 22:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10958-7fectly accommodate Kripke’s notions of apriority and necessity). After explaining this theory and why it might be fruitfully applied to color terms, it defends six theses: that (1) the predicate “is red” and (2) even the relation “appears red to” are hidden indexicals, that (3) the phenomenal, the c作者: BIDE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 04:20
Srebrenica — ein konsensbildendes Ereignis?or diagonals within the epistemologically reinterpreted character theory of Kaplan (section 14.1). However, this strategy seems to founder either at Block’s dilemma between a too syntacticist or too holistic understanding of narrow contents and concepts or at Schiffer’s problem that the character th作者: Ejaculate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 05:33 作者: Fortuitous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 10:45
