標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences; A Journey Along the Kolja Ehrenstein Book 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 Causal Explanati [打印本頁] 作者: 底的根除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:19
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences被引頻次
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences年度引用
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences讀者反饋
書目名稱Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: lavish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:27
Blick hinter die virtuellen Kulissencism of Woodward is successful. I close this chapter with a discussion of how my analysis of the permissive-instructive terminology fits together with Woodward’s analysis and Conrad Hal Waddington’s model of the epigenetic landscape.作者: 灰心喪氣 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:13
Permissive and Instructive Causes,cism of Woodward is successful. I close this chapter with a discussion of how my analysis of the permissive-instructive terminology fits together with Woodward’s analysis and Conrad Hal Waddington’s model of the epigenetic landscape.作者: Arthropathy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:50
Die LoF: vertiefende Darstellung is also possible, since Ariew’s argument relies on a false dichotomy between dynamical and statistical explanations. This chapter concludes with a discussion of why I nevertheless reject Mayr’s terminology. The primary problem is that it collapses into a naive account of explanatory relativity that is incompatible with reasoning in biology.作者: Airtight 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:10 作者: 嬰兒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-69049-9ce one strategy employed by adherents of counterfactual theory is to deny that there is any need to solve the problem of absurd hypothetical causal explanations, I also develop an argument as to why this problem must not be ignored. I show that ignoring this problem disconnects counterfactual theory from explanatory practices in the life sciences.作者: 嬰兒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:15
Omissions and Conceptual Distinctions of Causal Concepts,ce one strategy employed by adherents of counterfactual theory is to deny that there is any need to solve the problem of absurd hypothetical causal explanations, I also develop an argument as to why this problem must not be ignored. I show that ignoring this problem disconnects counterfactual theory from explanatory practices in the life sciences.作者: indices 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:40 作者: 帽子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:53 作者: 預(yù)防注射 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:34 作者: MURAL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:53
Recognising Pluralism and Arity Pluralism,uish (plain) causal pluralism from arity pluralism. Plain causal pluralism is the claim that one cannot successfully analyse a master concept that subsumes more specific causal concepts. Monism is the claim that this is possible. Arity pluralism is a form of conceptual plurality that postulates causal concepts of different arity.作者: synovitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:34 作者: 愛管閑事 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:08
Conceptual Pluralism, opposed to an epistemic or metaphysical approach. This chapter gives a brief preliminary introduction to my account of conceptual causal pluralism and I explain why I reject the idea of proving or disproving the vague general position of causal pluralism.作者: 敵意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:11
Recognising Pluralism and Arity Pluralism,-order logic and argue that it is nevertheless possible to employ first-order logic in an attempt at structuring claims of causal pluralism. I distinguish (plain) causal pluralism from arity pluralism. Plain causal pluralism is the claim that one cannot successfully analyse a master concept that sub作者: 暴露他抗議 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:10 作者: judiciousness 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:03
Permissive and Instructive Causes,iological permissive-instructive scale translates into causal specificity as influence. My conclusion is that Woodward is correct in conjecturing this. This means that the permissive-instructive scale cannot be an instance of pluralism. However, I also discuss why Woodward didn’t succeed in illustra作者: 癡呆 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:38 作者: metropolitan 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:52
Epilogue,nt suggestion to speak of ‘reciprocal causation’ and I suggest that researchers should be more open about the fact that they do (and in my opinion also need to) compare and weigh causal contributions against each other. The chapter closes with a warning not to overestimate the scope for reasonable a作者: 最后一個(gè) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:03 作者: 阻擋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:24
978-3-030-87944-0Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022作者: 阻擋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:56
Causal Pluralism in the Life Sciences978-3-030-87942-6Series ISSN 2211-1948 Series E-ISSN 2211-1956 作者: Reservation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:29 作者: 冥想后 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:03
The Intentional Self-Leadershipnt suggestion to speak of ‘reciprocal causation’ and I suggest that researchers should be more open about the fact that they do (and in my opinion also need to) compare and weigh causal contributions against each other. The chapter closes with a warning not to overestimate the scope for reasonable applications of causal pluralism.作者: CRAFT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:48 作者: ALT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:44 作者: 小木槌 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:58 作者: 串通 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:11 作者: Affluence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:47
Kolja EhrensteinIntroduces a new systematic approach to causal pluralism.Argues against traditional accounts of causal pluralism.Demonstrates why causal pluralism might be largely irrelevant in the philosophy of biol作者: 放肆的我 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 15:25
History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Scienceshttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/222625.jpg作者: 閃光東本 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:55 作者: 談判 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:00 作者: AV-node 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:44
Die LoF: vertiefende Darstellungonsistencies. I then discuss known objections to Mayr by Richard C. Francis and André Ariew. I show that despite its inconsistencies Mayr’s account can be easily defended against Francis’s objection that ultimate explanations are just functional explanations. Defending Mayr against Ariew’s objection作者: 偉大 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:06 作者: 玩忽職守 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-69049-9isms. I argue that the disposition-based process theory has the resources to account for biological feedback and that it can also exclude bogus omissions as causes or effects since it confines itself to actuality. Alternatives, such as interventionist theory or counterfactual theory, fail to exclude作者: 戲法 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:45 作者: bacteria 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:21
Conceptual Pluralism, opposed to an epistemic or metaphysical approach. This chapter gives a brief preliminary introduction to my account of conceptual causal pluralism and I explain why I reject the idea of proving or disproving the vague general position of causal pluralism.作者: 哪有黃油 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:21 作者: fulcrum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:59
H. Winkler,R. Fischer-Colbriert I describes the key players and the key institutions that build and operate the hardware, the rockets that provide access to space, and the spacecraft that carry out the enterprise. Part II is about putting these pieces together to enable space flight and mission campaigns. Part II is written in 作者: Inferior 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:04 作者: pantomime 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:39 作者: Deference 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:09
Marx, Neo-Gramscianism and Globalizationher natural language tasks. The chapter first presents an overview of approaches for specific target populations (not covered in Chapter 6) to then describe the use of text simplification technology to facilitate some tasks such as parsing, information extraction, or text summarization.作者: Exuberance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 19:52 作者: Occipital-Lobe 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96142-7Betriebssystem; Datenendeinrichtung; Datenerfassung; Datensicherung; Datenverarbeitung; Datenübertragung;
