標(biāo)題: Titlebook: British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm; Revising the Revisio Azar Gat Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P [打印本頁] 作者: APL 時間: 2025-3-21 19:01
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm被引頻次
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm年度引用
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm讀者反饋
書目名稱British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer Arm讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: scoliosis 時間: 2025-3-21 21:28
Book 2000s between the two World Wars. He reinstates British pioneering theory and practice as the inspiration for the creators of the Panzer arm that made possible Germany‘s ‘Blitzkrieg‘ victories in the opening stage of World War II.作者: Nmda-Receptor 時間: 2025-3-22 02:46 作者: strdulate 時間: 2025-3-22 06:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25263-1e interwar period he supposedly envisaged, developed, and directly influenced the way armoured forces would be employed during the Second World War, first by the Germans in their brilliant ‘Blitzkrieg’ campaigns and, subsequently, by all other major armies. Yet in recent years historians have come t作者: 廣大 時間: 2025-3-22 12:39 作者: conjunctiva 時間: 2025-3-22 13:33 作者: 下級 時間: 2025-3-22 19:04
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333982389Blitzkrieg; Germany; Krieg; World War II作者: 連累 時間: 2025-3-23 00:38 作者: 暗語 時間: 2025-3-23 02:04
St Antony‘s Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/191003.jpg作者: metropolitan 時間: 2025-3-23 07:41 作者: 起來了 時間: 2025-3-23 10:45
Richard Allmendinger,Joshua Knowles . (1948), or ., as the American edition was called. Out of deepest conviction and best of motives, Liddell Hart became one of the leaders of an unpopular public campaign on the German generals’ behalf.He argued relentlessly that they were no more than honourable and patriotic professional soldiers 作者: Inclement 時間: 2025-3-23 16:11 作者: LAST 時間: 2025-3-23 21:24
,Liddell Hart’s Theory of Armoured Warfare,n the long run withstand critical scrutiny and only cast doubt on everything he wrote about himself. Nonetheless, a further examination of the evidence reveals that the main charges levelled against him are misplaced and based on almost incredible historiographical slips on the part of his chief cri作者: intellect 時間: 2025-3-24 00:46 作者: idiopathic 時間: 2025-3-24 05:21
Conclusion, small offensive element of infantry was needed to support the tanks. This, however, was much less significant than he would later make it to be, for all the armour enthusiasts agreed that the armoured formation had to be tank-heavy, with only Lindsay on the record for proposing a more balanced team作者: 爆炸 時間: 2025-3-24 08:22
British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer ArmRevising the Revisio作者: jet-lag 時間: 2025-3-24 14:11 作者: 似少年 時間: 2025-3-24 16:00 作者: 連鎖,連串 時間: 2025-3-24 20:52 作者: Locale 時間: 2025-3-25 00:07 作者: Hay-Fever 時間: 2025-3-25 03:37
Conclusion,eration with aircraft, was pioneered in Britain from the early 1920s. Its leading proponent by far, both within the army and in public, was Fuller who by the end of the Great War had already begun to synthesize and develop with his great imaginative and historical sweep Martel’s seminal notions of t作者: GRACE 時間: 2025-3-25 11:29
7樓作者: 外來 時間: 2025-3-25 15:34
7樓作者: Stagger 時間: 2025-3-25 16:00
7樓作者: Stricture 時間: 2025-3-25 22:54
7樓作者: 安撫 時間: 2025-3-26 02:57
8樓作者: antenna 時間: 2025-3-26 06:36
8樓作者: nonchalance 時間: 2025-3-26 11:07
8樓作者: 包租車船 時間: 2025-3-26 13:08
9樓作者: 嘮叨 時間: 2025-3-26 18:49
9樓作者: 空洞 時間: 2025-3-27 00:06
9樓作者: LUMEN 時間: 2025-3-27 04:07
9樓作者: Sciatica 時間: 2025-3-27 06:19
10樓作者: Flirtatious 時間: 2025-3-27 11:09
10樓作者: 錯 時間: 2025-3-27 17:21
10樓作者: finite 時間: 2025-3-27 17:49
10樓
