標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62; Power Politics Martin Theaker Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) [打印本頁] 作者: 貪吃的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:40
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62被引頻次
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62年度引用
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62讀者反饋
書目名稱Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Gnrh670 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:30
Introduction,logy by the world’s great powers interacted with attempts to rebuild a shattered Europe along peaceful and democratic lines. This introduction surveys the current state of literature on Britain’s civil nuclear energy projects, and highlights the severe lack of interplay between this field and the si作者: 烤架 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:22
,Britain and the Limits of Atomic Independence, 1945–1953,946 as Congress prevented any continued interaction between Washington and foreign states in the atomic field. Traditionally, this divorce has been seen as disastrous for continental nuclear cooperation but, in an important new argument, this chapter shows how this divorce instead merely channelled 作者: byline 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:52 作者: BANAL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:01 作者: 使混合 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:07 作者: Budget 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:43 作者: 贊成你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:19 作者: Defraud 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:05
Conclusion,factors. Firstly, Britain was hampered by the strict restrictions placed on it by Washington, even if these were not as terminal as sometimes asserted. Britain also suffered from a lack of discernment in choosing its preferred partners, prioritising the remote expanses of the Commonwealth over its i作者: RALES 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:22 作者: 榮幸 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:16 作者: BLANK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:35 作者: MODE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3779-6 failed, ministers in Whitehall were left with no choice but to concede that they must apply for membership of the single market. Forced also to join Euratom against their will, British scientists fought hard to retain the maximum sovereignty over their nuclear projects while accepting their inevitable absorption into the Six.作者: Diskectomy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:28
Book 2018ance was missed by ministers due to a combination of disorganization and diplomatic pressure, as well as a perennial lack of domestic resources. In so doing, this book joins the long-disconnected historiographies of European integration and nuclear energy to offer a new perspective on both scholarly fields..作者: brother 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29950-5d new forums for discussing the declassified aspects of atomic energy. As such, although none of these interfaces were crucial individually, they nonetheless combined to produce an aggregate body of interaction sufficient to establish Britain as Europe’s informal nuclear leader.作者: 相容 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29950-5w Churchill’s thirst for grand statesmanship led him to support the American scheme despite the fact that the President’s requests for donations of uranium from his allies would have a damaging impact on Britain’s domestic nuclear plans.作者: Budget 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 11:42 作者: 體貼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:37
Esophageal pH and Impedance Monitoring as did its initially byzantine processes for responding to foreign opportunities. As such, this book ties together several complex strands of activity to build a more complete picture of the turbulent Anglo-European nuclear relationship during the 1950s.作者: Gobble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:07
,Britain and the Limits of Atomic Independence, 1945–1953,d new forums for discussing the declassified aspects of atomic energy. As such, although none of these interfaces were crucial individually, they nonetheless combined to produce an aggregate body of interaction sufficient to establish Britain as Europe’s informal nuclear leader.作者: debacle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:00 作者: vitreous-humor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:40 作者: flex336 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:08
Conclusion, as did its initially byzantine processes for responding to foreign opportunities. As such, this book ties together several complex strands of activity to build a more complete picture of the turbulent Anglo-European nuclear relationship during the 1950s.作者: Indebted 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:48 作者: BLANK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 19:30 作者: 充氣球 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:09
,Britain, the United States and Euratom, 1958–1960,eventually threw its weight behind a series of OEEC joint projects in a bid to promote the intergovernmental model as the most appropriate for European cooperation. When Macmillan’s bid to patch the Six and the OEEC with a compatible Free Trade Area (FTA) eventually failed in 1958, Britain was thus left politically and atomically marginalised.作者: LIMIT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:20 作者: 鐵砧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:25
Book 2018 first application to join the European Communities. Tracing the development of the British nuclear programme as it emerged as a global leader in constructing the world’s first atomic power stations, it analyses how the threat of energy shortages throughout the 1950s presented ministers with a golde作者: 我正派 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:30
2947-7182 importance of nuclear energy in diplomatic relations and the.This book examines the role played by civil nuclear energy in Britain’s relationship with Europe between the end of the Second World War and London’s first application to join the European Communities. Tracing the development of the Britis作者: otic-capsule 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:06
Britain, Europe and Civil Nuclear Energy, 1945–62978-3-319-73927-4Series ISSN 2947-7182 Series E-ISSN 2947-7190 作者: meretricious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:16 作者: Hemodialysis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29950-5946 as Congress prevented any continued interaction between Washington and foreign states in the atomic field. Traditionally, this divorce has been seen as disastrous for continental nuclear cooperation but, in an important new argument, this chapter shows how this divorce instead merely channelled 作者: Perineum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:53 作者: FLAX 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:44 作者: 反省 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:30 作者: 微枝末節(jié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:20 作者: Arthritis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:11 作者: 鄙視 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:01
Esophageal pH and Impedance Monitoringfactors. Firstly, Britain was hampered by the strict restrictions placed on it by Washington, even if these were not as terminal as sometimes asserted. Britain also suffered from a lack of discernment in choosing its preferred partners, prioritising the remote expanses of the Commonwealth over its i作者: Corral 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:18 作者: 貪心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:06
978-3-030-08887-3The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018作者: 預(yù)兆好 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:45
