標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Borrowing Justification for Proportionality; On the Influence of Jo?o Andrade Neto Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Judicial [打印本頁] 作者: 宗派 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 19:11
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality被引頻次
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality年度引用
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality讀者反饋
書目名稱Borrowing Justification for Proportionality讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 營養(yǎng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:41
Book 2018e question “are courts justified in borrowing proportionality?” has not been expressly put in many countries where judicial borrowings are a reality. This book sheds light on this question and examines the circumstances under which courts are authorized to borrow from alien legal sources to rule on 作者: 泄露 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:55
Logistikprozesse im Lebensmittelhandel,ogical and methodological choices that conform the study. Proportionality has originated in Germany, where it has performed a central role in the adjudication of disputes concerning fundamental rights. The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) has enthusiastically resorted to the test, remarkably to作者: 是他笨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:08 作者: Campaign 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:58 作者: 愚笨 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:27
Simone Gottlieb,Dmitry Ivanov,Ajay Dase either rules or principles in accordance with the principles theory. My task is not to confront whether the Federal Constitution allows one to conceive it as such a set of rules and principles, as this has not been under dispute in Brazil. I shall show instead that the STF’s understanding on princ作者: Overdose 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:29 作者: PAEAN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:43
Logistik im Zeichen der Urbanisierungn of fundamental rights. The incorporation of such rights and principles in a legal system imposes constraints upon the legislature, but also creates situations of conflict between state branches that challenge the authority of constitutional courts. Alexy upholds a procedural conception of constitu作者: 豐滿中國 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:38 作者: AWE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:11
Logistik im Zwischenwerksverkehruthority to draw conclusions from legal sources that were not democratically accredited by the people on behalf of whom judges decide. So, inasmuch as the Brazilian Supreme Court (like other constitutional courts) have borrowed the proportionality test, the reasons for doing so must be sufficient to作者: 舊石器 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 11:21 作者: ABASH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02263-1Judicial Borrowing; Principles Theory; Constitutional Migration; Robert Alexy; Supreme Federal Court of 作者: JADED 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:00
Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018作者: Canvas 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:19 作者: hypotension 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:08 作者: labile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:05
Introduction,ogical and methodological choices that conform the study. Proportionality has originated in Germany, where it has performed a central role in the adjudication of disputes concerning fundamental rights. The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) has enthusiastically resorted to the test, remarkably to作者: myopia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:37
On the Migration of Proportionality, test as a normative argument. It starts providing an overview of the specialized literature on the migration of proportionality and its reception in Brazil, where it has served the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Section?. briefly reconstructs the three phases of the historical development of proporti作者: Extort 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:34 作者: harangue 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:55
A System of Rules and Principles,e either rules or principles in accordance with the principles theory. My task is not to confront whether the Federal Constitution allows one to conceive it as such a set of rules and principles, as this has not been under dispute in Brazil. I shall show instead that the STF’s understanding on princ作者: CYT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:35
A Charter of Rights with Wide Scope, approach to rights (and which of their variant forms) provides the best understanding of the constitution. The two main rival approaches reflect the dominant legal practice in the U.S. and in Germany. In attempt to grasp the features of fundamental rights as they appeared in the case law of the Ger作者: Canary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:26 作者: FORGO 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:12 作者: 可轉(zhuǎn)變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:13 作者: 泥土謙卑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:43 作者: Cougar 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:17
Stefan Drechsler,Lukas Knieps,Rainer Laschcontains the first references to Alexy in the STF’s case law, and discloses peculiarities about the court’s organization and functioning. Finally, Sect.?. expounds the democratic objection against borrowing and advances three theses (weak, moderate, and strong) that could justify the judicial recour作者: 分解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:05 作者: 虛弱的神經(jīng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:12 作者: Adherent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:47
Meike Schr?der,Karsten Findeis,Hagen Sp?thed the Federal Constitution as a charter of wide-scope rights, in accordance with Alexy’s principles theory. The court has done so despite the constitutional silence regarding the possibility of legislative limits to the fundamental rights. To demonstrate this, Section?. begins by discussing the int作者: allergy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:24 作者: Decongestant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:40
Logistik im Zeichen der Urbanisierungwelve decisions in which the STF referred to Alexy’s conception of rights to positive state action. Amongst these judgements, the most relevant are the . (2010), delivered under the Mendes Court. Section?. discloses system-dependent and system-independent justification for the borrowings. I argue th作者: 刀鋒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:28
Logistik im Zwischenwerksverkehrs example contradicts Alexy’s strong thesis, according to which proportionality is logically derived from the structure of principles. An alternative reason offered by the weak theses was proven insufficient. Only the moderate thesis offers adequate and sufficient justification for borrowing the tes作者: Parabola 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:40
1534-6781 r curious about Brazilian constitutional law, this book questions the alleged universality of the proportionality test, challenges the premises of Alexy’s principles theory, and discloses more than 68 Brazilian978-3-030-02263-1Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902 作者: VEIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:11
Book 2018luable resource for those interested in comparative constitutional law and legal theory, or curious about Brazilian constitutional law, this book questions the alleged universality of the proportionality test, challenges the premises of Alexy’s principles theory, and discloses more than 68 Brazilian作者: 逃避責(zé)任 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:10
Introduction,es decide. In this study, I shall tackle these and other normative issues that borrowings raise and that neither comparatists nor constitutional theorists have successfully approached. This chapter introduces the theoretic premises of the study, delineates the concepts of legal migrations, voluntary作者: LURE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:22
On the Migration of Proportionality,contains the first references to Alexy in the STF’s case law, and discloses peculiarities about the court’s organization and functioning. Finally, Sect.?. expounds the democratic objection against borrowing and advances three theses (weak, moderate, and strong) that could justify the judicial recour作者: Expostulate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:59
The Principles-Theory Variant of Proportionality,ich the STF or one of its Justices or panels have recourse to the principles-theory variant of proportionality or its sub-tests. Section?. meets critiques often addressed to the use Brazilian Justices have made of the test: that the STF performs an inaccurate imitation of proportionality analysis, m作者: 燒烤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:39 作者: 植物群 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:34 作者: Interlocking 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:29 作者: ARBOR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:21
A Final Argument in Favour of Proportionality,welve decisions in which the STF referred to Alexy’s conception of rights to positive state action. Amongst these judgements, the most relevant are the . (2010), delivered under the Mendes Court. Section?. discloses system-dependent and system-independent justification for the borrowings. I argue th
