標題: Titlebook: Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant; Philosophy and Scien Wolfgang Lefèvre Book 20011st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 200 [打印本頁] 作者: 支票 時間: 2025-3-21 18:46
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant影響因子(影響力)學科排名
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant網(wǎng)絡公開度
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant被引頻次
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant被引頻次學科排名
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant年度引用
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant年度引用學科排名
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant讀者反饋
書目名稱Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant讀者反饋學科排名
作者: indicate 時間: 2025-3-21 23:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85642-9all structure of the Glasgow natural philosophy course that continued through Kelvin’s early professorship. Robison, it has been argued, defined a particularly Scottish approach to natural philosophy that influenced Meikleham and later Kelvin and Maxwell. The most direct path from Newton to Kelvin and Maxwell passed through Enlightenment Scotland.作者: Antimicrobial 時間: 2025-3-22 01:15 作者: 忙碌 時間: 2025-3-22 06:37 作者: 拋媚眼 時間: 2025-3-22 10:07 作者: 潛移默化 時間: 2025-3-22 16:22
The Limits of Intelligibility: The Status of Physical Science in D’Alembert’s Philosophyse . appeared in 1736), comes the time for theoretical reorganisation, for systematic presentation. But it is also time for new inquiries, into celestial perturbations, fluid phenomena, mechanical systems.作者: 使饑餓 時間: 2025-3-22 18:52 作者: 聯(lián)想 時間: 2025-3-22 21:37 作者: instill 時間: 2025-3-23 04:44 作者: creatine-kinase 時間: 2025-3-23 07:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48954-3atory principles are still part of present thinking in biology is shown by the frequency with which eighteenth-century naturalists are invoked as forerunners of modern convictions or as original sources of combatted doctrines in today’s controversies on various topics of biological systematics..作者: 牢騷 時間: 2025-3-23 13:07 作者: Fsh238 時間: 2025-3-23 15:07 作者: NIB 時間: 2025-3-23 18:53 作者: Aboveboard 時間: 2025-3-24 01:22 作者: 遠足 時間: 2025-3-24 05:33 作者: 利用 時間: 2025-3-24 10:02 作者: 寬敞 時間: 2025-3-24 12:20
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001作者: Locale 時間: 2025-3-24 15:05 作者: 慢跑 時間: 2025-3-24 21:51 作者: 沙漠 時間: 2025-3-25 01:06 作者: 比賽用背帶 時間: 2025-3-25 07:00 作者: Vo2-Max 時間: 2025-3-25 09:12 作者: 相信 時間: 2025-3-25 14:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88983-6tood. From today’s point of view, one might be tempted to say that philosophers and scientists in the seventeenth and even more in the eighteenth century became aware of the importance of mathematics as a means of ‘representing’ physical phenomena or as an ‘instrument’ of deductive explanation and p作者: 愉快嗎 時間: 2025-3-25 18:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63336-6which “Newtonian physics” of the eighteenth and nineteenth century is a derivative) began to assert itself against the then dominant Cartesian physics. “Cartesian physics” generally meant the physics of Descartes’ inclusive of the “physics” of all those scientists who accepted the fundamentals of De作者: 不出名 時間: 2025-3-25 20:20 作者: 煤渣 時間: 2025-3-26 03:08 作者: V洗浴 時間: 2025-3-26 05:18 作者: 馬具 時間: 2025-3-26 11:34
überblick über einige Testverfahrenicate anything of the contemporary debates from which his ideas sprang. Some of this context is of course well known, like the opposition between rationalism and empirism, or the contemporary import of Humean scepticism. In the first edition (1781) of the . (A redaction), in the chapter on the “Para作者: 節(jié)約 時間: 2025-3-26 16:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48954-3century. Classificatory work itself was one of the most important occupations of the naturalists of the time among whom we encounter such famous figures as Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778), Georges-Louis Leclerc Buffon (1707–1788), Michel Adanson (1727–1806), Antoin Laurent Jussieu (1748–1836), and Jean Ba作者: 瘋狂 時間: 2025-3-26 18:44 作者: olfction 時間: 2025-3-26 22:57
Leibniz’ Concept of Possible Worlds and the Analysis of Motion in Eighteenth-Century Physicsnew period in the intellectual biography of Leibniz that would later result in his well-known metaphysics of individual substances. It was in the 1680s that these ideas began to surface in various of his papers, such as ., published in 1684, but also in the manuscript . written in the same year. In 作者: 閑逛 時間: 2025-3-27 04:42
The Limits of Intelligibility: The Status of Physical Science in D’Alembert’s Philosophy of faith? After the great successes of Galileo and Newton, after the triumph of the new analytical methods of Varignon, the Bernoullis and Euler (whose . appeared in 1736), comes the time for theoretical reorganisation, for systematic presentation. But it is also time for new inquiries, into celest作者: indices 時間: 2025-3-27 06:25
Order of Nature and Orders of Sciencetood. From today’s point of view, one might be tempted to say that philosophers and scientists in the seventeenth and even more in the eighteenth century became aware of the importance of mathematics as a means of ‘representing’ physical phenomena or as an ‘instrument’ of deductive explanation and p作者: 使入迷 時間: 2025-3-27 10:38 作者: AMEND 時間: 2025-3-27 16:37 作者: 細查 時間: 2025-3-27 17:53
Enlightenment Scotland’s Philosophico-Chemical PhysicsNewtonians of course, were the most significant Scottish professors of natural philosophy in the eighteenth century — Anderson for four decades at Glasgow University, from 1757 until his death in 1796, and Robison for three decades at Edinburgh University, from 1774 until his death in 1805. Anderson作者: lipoatrophy 時間: 2025-3-28 00:40
Materialistic Theories of Mind and Brainns, concerning its nature, its philosophical inspiration or its aims, to name but a few. One can even doubt whether such a label, despite being consecrated by usage, has any real meaning, as there are great differences between those who have been included in the group of eighteenth-century French ma作者: 血統(tǒng) 時間: 2025-3-28 06:05
Kant’s Second Paralogism in Contexticate anything of the contemporary debates from which his ideas sprang. Some of this context is of course well known, like the opposition between rationalism and empirism, or the contemporary import of Humean scepticism. In the first edition (1781) of the . (A redaction), in the chapter on the “Para作者: 橡子 時間: 2025-3-28 08:26 作者: 坦白 時間: 2025-3-28 13:51
0068-0346 iples of classification in the life sciences. As an appendix, a critical edition and first translation into English of Newton‘s .scholia. from David Gregory‘s Estate on the Propositions IV through IX Book III of his .Principia. is added.978-94-015-9729-6Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942 作者: 聯(lián)合 時間: 2025-3-28 15:09 作者: Moderate 時間: 2025-3-28 19:19 作者: stratum-corneum 時間: 2025-3-29 01:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63336-6ding significance of his .. Owing to the extremely high standards of mathematical and geometrical skill that were needed to follow Newton’s reasoning, it was left to a few great scientists of the day like C. Huygens and G. W. Leibniz to disseminate the news — and often through attack rather than pro作者: 北京人起源 時間: 2025-3-29 06:29
Schulische Leistung und Begabungtion) saw it as a purely late eighteenth-century phenomenon, centred around the ., published in 1770, which did, it is true, lead to a great polemical debate and the republication of earlier materialistic works. What I would like to do in this article is not to give a general survey of eighteenth-ce作者: FAR 時間: 2025-3-29 08:55
Disciplinary Transformations in the Age of Newton: The Case of Metaphysicsly included . or ., and ., for some simply another name for ., for others the philosophical subject .. So when we contemplate the relations between “philosophy” and “science” in the eighteenth century, we confront a lattice of shifting contrasts and identities whose complexity makes it problematic h
