標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Basic Questions on Truth; Paul Weingartner Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 argumentation.history.history of liter [打印本頁] 作者: 水平 時間: 2025-3-21 17:33
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth被引頻次
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth年度引用
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth讀者反饋
書目名稱Basic Questions on Truth讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: faction 時間: 2025-3-21 23:08 作者: 古老 時間: 2025-3-22 00:40
Hierarchy and Hierarchical Systems, and yet the conclusion false, and although for each such step, A, we are able to draw up a self-evident general rule that from a premiss of such and such a form such and such a form of conclusion will necessarily follow,…”作者: 分開如此和諧 時間: 2025-3-22 05:29 作者: Calculus 時間: 2025-3-22 11:07
,Is it appropriate to ask for the meaning or for the definition of the expression “truth”, “the true, beliefs or opinions:.“There is however a preliminary question which is rather less difficult, and that is: What do we mean by truth and falsehood?… we are not asking how we can know whether a belief is true or false: we are asking what is meant by the question whether a belief is true or false.”作者: 門窗的側(cè)柱 時間: 2025-3-22 13:08 作者: accessory 時間: 2025-3-22 20:10
Ens et verum convertuntur?, true, and the bad were in itself false — but in thought…”. “But since the combination and the separation are in thought and not in things, and that which is in this sense is a different sort of ‘being’ from the things that are in the full sense …”. (3) Thus being and truth are not mutually convertible.作者: 奇怪 時間: 2025-3-22 22:54
Hierarchy and Hierarchical Systems,hows that nothing more has been said than in the simple sentence ‘5 is a prime number’. … It follows that the relation of the thought to the True may not be compared with that of subject to predicate.”作者: 克制 時間: 2025-3-23 05:05 作者: duplicate 時間: 2025-3-23 08:26
Book 2000he one of David for Deflationist (and Disquotational) Theories of Truth; that of Chapuis for Revision Theories of Truth; that of Kirkham for Correspondence Theories and several others; that ofRescher for Coherence Theories of Truth. Moreover the book is not an analy- sis just of Tar ski‘s theory, li作者: Flustered 時間: 2025-3-23 12:07 作者: encomiast 時間: 2025-3-23 13:59
Is a sentence true iff it corresponds to reality?,ue, there is a man. And whereas the true statement is in no way the cause of the actual thing’s existence, the actual thing does seem in some way the cause of the statement’s being true; it is because the actual thing exists or does not that the statement is called true or false.”作者: 懸掛 時間: 2025-3-23 20:24
Hierarchy and Hierarchical Systems,nal animal’ (where the subject stands for what can be). Nevertheless, no such affirmative proposition which is merely .? or .? is ever necessary. Thus, the simple propositions ‘Man is a rational animal’ and ‘Man is a substance composed of body and intellective soul’ are not necessary. The reason is 作者: 心胸狹窄 時間: 2025-3-23 23:24
Fundamental Theories of Physicse demonstration that sentences are true or false is taken over from Tarski’s extensive demonstrations of this facts in mhis essay “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages”. From this it also fallows that those kinds of propositions which can be defined by means of sentences (section 6.5) can al作者: Mutter 時間: 2025-3-24 03:36
Are definitions true or false?,nal animal’ (where the subject stands for what can be). Nevertheless, no such affirmative proposition which is merely .? or .? is ever necessary. Thus, the simple propositions ‘Man is a rational animal’ and ‘Man is a substance composed of body and intellective soul’ are not necessary. The reason is 作者: aptitude 時間: 2025-3-24 09:36 作者: 古老 時間: 2025-3-24 10:40
Book 2000ms with re- lated ones in the whole history of philosophy. The method to incorporate important philosophers of the tradition into the analysis is that of disputation, i. e. of putting some of their main thesis into objections or counterobjections pro or contra a posi- tive answer to the respective q作者: 抱怨 時間: 2025-3-24 15:10
ent problems with re- lated ones in the whole history of philosophy. The method to incorporate important philosophers of the tradition into the analysis is that of disputation, i. e. of putting some of their main thesis into objections or counterobjections pro or contra a posi- tive answer to the respective q978-94-010-5779-0978-94-011-4034-8作者: 一瞥 時間: 2025-3-24 20:19 作者: enflame 時間: 2025-3-25 02:41 作者: Friction 時間: 2025-3-25 03:20
Hierarchy and Hierarchical Systems,, when talking about the .? says:.“That is to say, although every step of the reasoning is evidently such that the collective premisses cannot be true and yet the conclusion false, and although for each such step, A, we are able to draw up a self-evident general rule that from a premiss of such and 作者: 根除 時間: 2025-3-25 08:40
Hierarchy and Hierarchical Systems, and the definition or defining part) are not, therefore, necessarily true or false. For if they were, then in ‘Man is a rational animal’, ‘man’ as definiendum and ‘a(chǎn) rational animal’ as definition (definiens) would have to be true or false. Now according to Ockham:.“It should be noted that when, si作者: 制造 時間: 2025-3-25 13:52
Fundamental Theories of Physicsentences and propositions, are analogous to one another, both in the sense of analogy of proportion and in the sense of analogy of attribution. The demonstration will proceed as follows:Firstly, in sections 6.1–6.3 arguments will be brought from the history of philosophy, in each case defending one 作者: SMART 時間: 2025-3-25 15:49 作者: 傻瓜 時間: 2025-3-25 23:39 作者: Parameter 時間: 2025-3-26 00:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4034-8argumentation; history; history of literature; history of philosophy; interpret; philosophy; proposition; s作者: expire 時間: 2025-3-26 05:06
978-94-010-5779-0Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000作者: ANTH 時間: 2025-3-26 12:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48061-1“What is truth was an inquiry many ages since; and it being that which all mankind either do, or pretend to search after, it cannot but be worth our while carefully to examine wherein it consists, and so acquaint ourselves with the nature of it, as to observe how the mind distinguishes it from falsehood.”作者: 要求比…更好 時間: 2025-3-26 14:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48062-XIt seems that there are. For: (1) Every privation like blindness or deafness is a negative property. (2) But there are such things as blindness or deafness. (3) Therefore there are negative properties.作者: 致命 時間: 2025-3-26 19:47
Fundamental Theories of PhysicsAccording to Popper. a theory . is nearer to the truth than a theory . iff the true consequences of . (.) — also called truth-content of . — exceed those of . (.) and the false consequence of . (.) — also called falsity-content of . — are included in those of . (.).作者: Merited 時間: 2025-3-27 01:01
,Is it appropriate to ask “What is truth?”,“What is truth was an inquiry many ages since; and it being that which all mankind either do, or pretend to search after, it cannot but be worth our while carefully to examine wherein it consists, and so acquaint ourselves with the nature of it, as to observe how the mind distinguishes it from falsehood.”作者: 雀斑 時間: 2025-3-27 01:52 作者: 生命層 時間: 2025-3-27 06:44 作者: 阻塞 時間: 2025-3-27 10:05 作者: interior 時間: 2025-3-27 17:04 作者: Phagocytes 時間: 2025-3-27 20:34 作者: 銀版照相 時間: 2025-3-28 00:17 作者: GULLY 時間: 2025-3-28 03:28
Are definitions true or false?, and the definition or defining part) are not, therefore, necessarily true or false. For if they were, then in ‘Man is a rational animal’, ‘man’ as definiendum and ‘a(chǎn) rational animal’ as definition (definiens) would have to be true or false. Now according to Ockham:.“It should be noted that when, si作者: 痛苦一生 時間: 2025-3-28 07:36
Judgements, propositions, sentences,entences and propositions, are analogous to one another, both in the sense of analogy of proportion and in the sense of analogy of attribution. The demonstration will proceed as follows:Firstly, in sections 6.1–6.3 arguments will be brought from the history of philosophy, in each case defending one 作者: FLAT 時間: 2025-3-28 10:48 作者: Insulin 時間: 2025-3-28 14:59
Ens et verum convertuntur?,Aristotle says, truth and falsity do not belong to being in its proper sense: “For falsity and truth are not in things — it is not as if the good were true, and the bad were in itself false — but in thought…”. “But since the combination and the separation are in thought and not in things, and that w作者: 我不明白 時間: 2025-3-28 20:29
10樓作者: finite 時間: 2025-3-29 00:11
10樓作者: averse 時間: 2025-3-29 05:35
10樓作者: 量被毀壞 時間: 2025-3-29 09:26
10樓
