標題: Titlebook: Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits; James H. Fetzer Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Charles Sanders Peirce.Chinese ro [打印本頁] 作者: GUAFF 時間: 2025-3-21 17:22
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits被引頻次
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits年度引用
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits讀者反饋
書目名稱Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 水土 時間: 2025-3-21 21:51 作者: 防止 時間: 2025-3-22 03:37 作者: 大罵 時間: 2025-3-22 07:27 作者: legacy 時間: 2025-3-22 11:14 作者: 大洪水 時間: 2025-3-22 14:18
Expert Systemsof expert knowledge in the form of a computer program in order to make that knowledge available to anyone who has the capability to utilize that program. If we define a . as a class of problems that stand in need of solutions and an expert as someone who is prepared to solve them, then an . can be c作者: Outspoken 時間: 2025-3-22 18:28 作者: monogamy 時間: 2025-3-22 22:06 作者: aqueduct 時間: 2025-3-23 02:41
Minds, Bodies, and Machinesent schemes for representing knowledge. Although there are those, such as Minsky, who dispute the suitability of logic for this purpose, their positions tend to derive such plausibility as they possess from focusing upon an extremely limited conception of the logical domain. The field of logic is no作者: Anticlimax 時間: 2025-3-23 09:25
0924-0780 ata- processing systems of all kinds, no matter whether human, (other) animal, or machine. Its scope is intended to span the full range of interests from classical problems in the philosophy of mind and philosophical psycholo- gy through issues in cognitive psychology and sociobiology (concerning th作者: octogenarian 時間: 2025-3-23 10:57
Book 1990ssing systems of all kinds, no matter whether human, (other) animal, or machine. Its scope is intended to span the full range of interests from classical problems in the philosophy of mind and philosophical psycholo- gy through issues in cognitive psychology and sociobiology (concerning the mental c作者: MILK 時間: 2025-3-23 14:48 作者: 可以任性 時間: 2025-3-23 18:21 作者: sorbitol 時間: 2025-3-24 00:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/b117852 special properties ordinarily possessed by non-artifacts. So these are things that have a certain property (intelligence) as a result of a certain process (because they were created, designed, or manufactured in this way).作者: 鐵塔等 時間: 2025-3-24 02:44 作者: 預(yù)測 時間: 2025-3-24 06:45 作者: ACE-inhibitor 時間: 2025-3-24 12:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023974feasible knowledge, scientific knowledge, and conversational knowledge. Perhaps the most surprising result of this analysis turns out to be the discovery that a relatively obscure requirement that affects the truth of laws in science promises to yield a uniform framework for dealing with them all.作者: 騷動 時間: 2025-3-24 16:59 作者: browbeat 時間: 2025-3-24 20:19 作者: hermitage 時間: 2025-3-25 02:17 作者: 遍及 時間: 2025-3-25 05:41
Symbol Systems and Semiotic Systemsn there are relevant differences, there is some important (crucial or critical) property distinguishing between them, an instance of what may be described as the . (to which we shall later have the occasion to return).作者: BROOK 時間: 2025-3-25 09:19 作者: 畫布 時間: 2025-3-25 13:22
Varieties of Knowledgefeasible knowledge, scientific knowledge, and conversational knowledge. Perhaps the most surprising result of this analysis turns out to be the discovery that a relatively obscure requirement that affects the truth of laws in science promises to yield a uniform framework for dealing with them all.作者: ALIEN 時間: 2025-3-25 19:02 作者: 季雨 時間: 2025-3-25 21:02
Minds, Bodies, and Machinesl properties. [Cf., for example, Prior (1967a) and (1967b), but especially Cargile (1984).] The specific subjects that happen to be pursued by specific students of logic at specific times no doubt reflect matters of current and continuing interest, but the field itself has enduring significance for that of artificial intelligence.作者: MERIT 時間: 2025-3-26 00:28 作者: Apogee 時間: 2025-3-26 07:37
978-0-7923-0548-4Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990作者: Leaven 時間: 2025-3-26 10:13
Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits978-94-009-1900-6Series ISSN 0924-0780 作者: 燈絲 時間: 2025-3-26 15:25 作者: 一夫一妻制 時間: 2025-3-26 17:49 作者: Intuitive 時間: 2025-3-26 22:10
Knowledge Representations semantic networks, scripts and frames, and the like — have two sides or aspects, which have to be coordinated or synchronized for representation to succeed. Adequately understood, knowledge representation techniques must involve both specific logical structures and specific epistemic content:作者: 側(cè)面左右 時間: 2025-3-27 04:20
Program Verificationott (1981b). McDermott suggests that there is a fundamental difference between .. Thus, in explaining the development of the expert system Rl, which is employed to configure VAX-11 computer systems, he expresses concern for a rather subtle issue:作者: Receive 時間: 2025-3-27 08:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/b117852gly difficult to define. The problem, of course, has two parts, since securing an adequate grasp of the nature of the artificial would do only as long as we were already in possession of a suitable understanding of the idea of intelligence. What is supposed to be “artificial” about artificial intell作者: Offstage 時間: 2025-3-27 13:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/b117852species of reasoning is all about. Generally speaking, reasoning by analogy occurs when two things (or kinds of things) are compared and the inference is drawn that, since one — the more familiar case — has some particular property, the other — less familiar case — does too. Reasoning by analogy can作者: 吃掉 時間: 2025-3-27 15:15 作者: Conducive 時間: 2025-3-27 19:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8961-1king within this field have gradually evolved in their positions, Fodor especially. Fodor (1987), for example, yields a functional analysis within common-sense psychology, yet he persists in maintaining that “there has to be a language of thought” [Fodor (1987), pp. 135–154]. On this point, I believ作者: 出血 時間: 2025-3-28 01:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0023974luminate what is going on from the perspective of the theory of knowledge. It will turn out that the problem of capturing common-sense knowledge has several different facets, not least of which are arriving at decisions as to the kind of knowledge that common sense is supposed to represent, on the o作者: pessimism 時間: 2025-3-28 04:28 作者: 情節(jié)劇 時間: 2025-3-28 10:15 作者: 悲觀 時間: 2025-3-28 13:40
Lecture Notes in Computer Scienceott (1981b). McDermott suggests that there is a fundamental difference between .. Thus, in explaining the development of the expert system Rl, which is employed to configure VAX-11 computer systems, he expresses concern for a rather subtle issue:作者: 蕁麻 時間: 2025-3-28 17:02 作者: STAT 時間: 2025-3-28 19:33
Studies in Cognitive Systemshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/162565.jpg作者: 直言不諱 時間: 2025-3-29 00:51
0924-0780 of Newell and Simon and finds its culmination in the computational conception of lan- guage and mentality. The "standard conception" represented by these views978-0-7923-0548-4978-94-009-1900-6Series ISSN 0924-0780 作者: 寄生蟲 時間: 2025-3-29 06:51
Book 1990he nature of thought, precisely because all thinking is computational. This paradigm draws its inspiration from the symbol-system hypothesis of Newell and Simon and finds its culmination in the computational conception of lan- guage and mentality. The "standard conception" represented by these views
