標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Around the Tree; Semantic and Metaphy Fabrice Correia,Andrea Iacona Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Actual future. [打印本頁] 作者: Goiter 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 16:57
書目名稱Around the Tree影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Around the Tree影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Around the Tree網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Around the Tree網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Around the Tree被引頻次
書目名稱Around the Tree被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Around the Tree年度引用
書目名稱Around the Tree年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Around the Tree讀者反饋
書目名稱Around the Tree讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 妨礙議事 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:41 作者: 半身雕像 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:59 作者: calamity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 07:35 作者: AMOR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:47
Juliana E. Raffaghelli,Cristina Richierior thinking about these fictional representations: not as representations of branching time series but rather as branching representations of linear time series. We explain how branching at the level of the representation creates a false impression that the story describes a branching of the time se作者: FLACK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:21 作者: 根除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:09
Juliana E. Raffaghelli,Cristina Richierie face of it, such a view avoids determinism and fatalism, while also representing the fact that there is a future which is ‘special’ because it is the one that will be the case. However, many have objected to the tenability of the thin red line theory by arguing that either it collapses on linear t作者: Galactogogue 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:55 作者: 取回 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:09 作者: CHECK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:37 作者: Pandemic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:44 作者: 休息 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5ld. The list includes temporal asymmetry and directionality, time flow and the existence of “now,” physical versus logical possibility, the openness of the future, quantum probabilities, and superpositional collapse. This chapter discusses these and how agents use the open future in order to act intelligently and rationally.作者: 飛鏢 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:53
Juliana E. Raffaghelli,Cristina Richierinature and branching semantics for past- and future-tensed sentences. Then I discuss a potential glitch for this solution, and propose a way to get around that glitch. Finally, I consider some likely objections to the view offered here, as well as replies to those objections.作者: 粗魯?shù)娜?nbsp; 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:57
Lorna E. Rourke,Lorraine M. Carter In this chapter, I discuss presentist reductions of eternalist discourse which do not involve quantification over proxies—i.e. presentistically acceptable surrogates for merely past and merely future entities.作者: Exclaim 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:40 作者: demote 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:14
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/161752.jpg作者: 變量 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:43 作者: disciplined 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:54 作者: Petechiae 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:17
Branching Time and Temporal Unity,oments of time can belong to the same time series only if, for each moment that lies between them, at least one simple substance . that moment. Since simple substances, by definition, cannot ., it appears that time could not branch . any particular moment, contrary to a core assumption of theories of branching time.作者: 不如屎殼郎 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:06 作者: brother 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 04:04
The Truth About the Past and the Future,nature and branching semantics for past- and future-tensed sentences. Then I discuss a potential glitch for this solution, and propose a way to get around that glitch. Finally, I consider some likely objections to the view offered here, as well as replies to those objections.作者: 圍裙 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:42 作者: 小說 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:49
Book 2013resent volume is intended to be a 360 degree reflection on the tree model. The contributions is gathers concern the model and its alternatives, both from a semantic and from a metaphysical point of view. ?作者: 強(qiáng)有力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:12 作者: 躲債 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:15
Thomas Ryberg,Lillian Buus,Marianne Georgsenill be suggested that there is no reason to be dismissive. Once the theory is properly articulated and some common misunderstandings are dispelled, it turns out clear that there is a coherent sense in which (1)-(3) are compatible with indeterminism.作者: 開玩笑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:21 作者: 類型 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:17 作者: pester 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:51 作者: catagen 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:02
0166-6991 researchers.The core topics addressed by the volume can meeOver the past few years, the tree model of time has been widely employed to deal with issues concerning the semantics of tensed discourse. The thought that has motivated its adoption is that the most plausible way to make sense of indetermi作者: 是突襲 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 19:33 作者: CESS 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:14
The Metaphysics of the Thin Red Line,e one that will be the case. However, many have objected to the tenability of the thin red line theory by arguing that either it collapses on linear time or it compels us to endorse thick metaphysical theses about the future. In this chapter, we argue against such attacks and show that TRL’s metaphysical grounds are solid.作者: mutineer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:24
Relativism, the Open Future, and Propositional Truth,d argument in “Future Contingents and Relative Truth” for truth relativism taking truth as a property of linguistic items, there is still one when taking it as a property of propositions; these issues do not depend on the nature of truth bearers. I conclude by outlining what I take to be the best li作者: CROW 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:51
Determinism, the Open Future and Branching Time,human freedom. In the fifth section, I argue that taking branching time seriously implies commitment to determinism. In the sixth section, I consider a recent attempt to capture the open future and show that it is naturally seen to draw on a conception of the determinately true as what is determined作者: 簡略 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:37 作者: 哀悼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:36 作者: 費(fèi)解 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5human freedom. In the fifth section, I argue that taking branching time seriously implies commitment to determinism. In the sixth section, I consider a recent attempt to capture the open future and show that it is naturally seen to draw on a conception of the determinately true as what is determined作者: 歡呼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:30
Relativism, the Open Future, and Propositional Truth,He defends the relativization of a truth predicate of linguistic items: utterances of sentences produced in concrete contexts. In more recent work, however, he contends that this was wrong, because when propositions are taken as truth bearers, the truth absolutists he was objecting to have an escape作者: MELON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:27 作者: Oration 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:34 作者: Meditate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:29 作者: 花爭吵 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 14:41
