標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; 4th International Wo Iyad Rahwan,Simon Parsons,Chris Reed Conference proceedings 2008 Springer-Verlag [打印本頁] 作者: fungus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:45
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Misnomer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:28 作者: 毛細(xì)血管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 01:08
Co-argumentation Artifact for Agent Societiesnge information..Argumentation is a dialogic process, and could occur through direct interaction, or through supports of some sorts—like blackboards, or electronic fora. The same holds for intelligent agents in a multi-agent system (MAS); here, however, it is not clear what could act as a support fo作者: fiscal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:27
On the Relevance of Utterances in Formal Inter-agent Dialoguesd studied different properties of dialogues. This work has established the space in which agents are permitted to interact through dialogues. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the mechanisms agents might use to choose how to act — the rhetorical maneuvering that they use to navigate th作者: tympanometry 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:53
A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Informationial for agents engaged in autonomous, goal-directed behavior, but access to such information is usually controlled by other autonomous agents having their own goals. Because these various goals may be in conflict with one another, rational interactions between the two agents may take the form of a d作者: 颶風(fēng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:36
Towards Characterising Argumentation Based Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Formatn and communication of argumentation knowledge amongst agents. The AIF is described as an abstract model, or “ontology”, characterising the core concepts and their relationships. Concrete reifications or syntaxes instantiating these concepts have also been described. Thus far the focus has been on r作者: 謊言 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 20:21 作者: incontinence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:19
The Hedgehog and the Foxs a concrete data structure for holding statements representing knowledge, goals, and decisions. Different priorities are attached to these items, corresponding to the probability of the knowledge, the preferences between goals, and the expected utilities of decisions. These concrete data structures作者: enormous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:38 作者: 不妥協(xié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:05 作者: 娘娘腔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:11 作者: 使苦惱 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:02 作者: Mercurial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:17
A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part I)yncretic direction such as the interplay between neural net argumentation and symbolic argumentation. More specifically, we address ourselves to the following basic questions that can not be overlooked..Consequently, we give the positive answers to them. They are beneficial for understanding or char作者: Aerophagia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:19
A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part II)yncretic direction such as the interplay between neural net argumentation and symbolic argumentation. This paper is a sequel to our former one (Part I) [1]. In this paper we address ourselves to the following basic questions that can not be overlooked. .Consequently, we give the positive answers to 作者: 核心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 05:52
Episodic Memory: Effortful Phenomena,gumentation within the A&A meta-model, we introduce here the notion of Co-Argumentation Artifact (CAA) as an artifact specialised in managing arguments and providing a coordination service for argumentation process in a MAS. In order to give concreteness to our proposal, we also discuss a first CAA 作者: 除草劑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:27 作者: 抱狗不敢前 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:21
Experimental Psychopharmacology,ues between agents. We also propose a declarative specification of these communicative concepts that is of sufficient generality to serve as an operational semantics. Specifically, we propose use of the Lightweight Coordination Calculus (LCC). We then illustrate our proposal with a use case multi-ag作者: Parabola 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:00
Fabio Taucer,Roberta Apostolskaes, like for instance classifying examples even when the set of training examples is inconsistent, and considering more general preference relations between hypotheses. Moreover, we show that in the particular case of concept learning, the results of version space theory are retrieved in an elegant 作者: accordance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 21:13 作者: 調(diào)味品 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:10
A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Informationzation to access some information source. This protocol is based on an argumentation dialog where agents handle specific preferences and acceptability over arguments. We show how this argumentation framework provides a semantics to the protocol dedicated to the exchange of arguments, and we illustra作者: Kindle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:19
Towards Characterising Argumentation Based Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Formatues between agents. We also propose a declarative specification of these communicative concepts that is of sufficient generality to serve as an operational semantics. Specifically, we propose use of the Lightweight Coordination Calculus (LCC). We then illustrate our proposal with a use case multi-ag作者: ITCH 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:03
Arguing and Explaining Classificationses, like for instance classifying examples even when the set of training examples is inconsistent, and considering more general preference relations between hypotheses. Moreover, we show that in the particular case of concept learning, the results of version space theory are retrieved in an elegant 作者: 面包屑 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:23
An Argumentation-Based Framework for Deliberation in Multi-agent Systems committee to decide upon some joint decision. We experimentally show that the deliberation in committees of agents improves the accuracy of group judgments. We also show that a voting scheme based on assessing the confidence of arguments improves the accuracy of group judgments than majority voting.作者: CULP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:01
A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part II)them. They are beneficial for understanding or characterizing the computation power and outcome of the neural net argumentation from the perspective of the symbolic argumentation. We also exemplify these results.作者: 懸崖 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:19
Research in Evolutionary Computation committee to decide upon some joint decision. We experimentally show that the deliberation in committees of agents improves the accuracy of group judgments. We also show that a voting scheme based on assessing the confidence of arguments improves the accuracy of group judgments than majority voting.作者: avulsion 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 02:34 作者: Leisureliness 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:33
Sensory Psychology and Perception,hen it is possible, and how this can be attained by the negotiating agents in this case. It defines also the notion of ., and shows in which situation an agent will make one, as well as how it influences the evolution of the dialogue.作者: 勉強(qiáng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:46 作者: blight 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:01 作者: 祝賀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:49
Research in Evolutionary Computationollowing basic questions that can not be overlooked..Consequently, we give the positive answers to them. They are beneficial for understanding or characterizing the computation power and outcome of the neural net argumentation from the perspective of the symbolic argumentation. We also exemplify these results.作者: insolence 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:27 作者: ALIEN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:47
On the Benefits of Exploiting Hierarchical Goals in Bilateral Automated Negotiationtypes of deals that can be reached through IBN and how they differ from those reachable using (classical) alternating offer bargaining. This paper bridges this gap by providing a formal framework for analysing the outcomes of IBN dialogues, and begins by analysing a specific IBN protocol.作者: fulcrum 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 07:32 作者: Ascendancy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:19
A Hybrid Argumentation of Symbolic and Neural Net Argumentation (Part I)ollowing basic questions that can not be overlooked..Consequently, we give the positive answers to them. They are beneficial for understanding or characterizing the computation power and outcome of the neural net argumentation from the perspective of the symbolic argumentation. We also exemplify these results.作者: 捐助 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:39
Episodic Memory: Effortful Phenomena,ay focussed on the subject of the dialogue and only make relevant remarks. Here we study several notions of relevance, showing how they can be related to both the rules for carrying out dialogues and to rhetorical maneuvering.作者: Obstacle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:48 作者: Outmoded 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5293-2wards, and possibly by making suppositions over missing information. Moreover, arguments are defined as tree-like structures. In this way, our computer system, implemented in Prolog, suggests some solutions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice.作者: 絕食 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:58 作者: 鋪?zhàn)?nbsp; 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:33 作者: 草率男 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:43
The Hedgehog and the Foxwards, and possibly by making suppositions over missing information. Moreover, arguments are defined as tree-like structures. In this way, our computer system, implemented in Prolog, suggests some solutions and provides an interactive and intelligible explanation of this choice.作者: 單獨(dú) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 15:33 作者: negotiable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 18:53
Defeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture on its perceived or derived beliefs, the agent will argue about which of its desires are achievable in the current situation. To clarify the ideas two applications will be introduced to show two significantly different types of agent that can be implemented using this approach.作者: craven 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:27
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems978-3-540-78915-4Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349 作者: 忘恩負(fù)義的人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:38 作者: Entrancing 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 07:22 作者: lethal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 14:02 作者: etiquette 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:34 作者: 鄙視 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:16
Episodic Memory: Effortful Phenomena,d studied different properties of dialogues. This work has established the space in which agents are permitted to interact through dialogues. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the mechanisms agents might use to choose how to act — the rhetorical maneuvering that they use to navigate th作者: 祖?zhèn)髫?cái)產(chǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 03:10 作者: ungainly 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:56
Experimental Psychopharmacology,n and communication of argumentation knowledge amongst agents. The AIF is described as an abstract model, or “ontology”, characterising the core concepts and their relationships. Concrete reifications or syntaxes instantiating these concepts have also been described. Thus far the focus has been on r作者: 遣返回國 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:10 作者: prolate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 15:13 作者: POINT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:03 作者: BADGE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 00:25 作者: 蚊子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 04:22
