標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence; Guillermo Simari,Iyad Rahwan Book 2009 Springer-Verlag US 2009 Bayesian network.agents.argument [打印本頁] 作者: Pessimistic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:05
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引頻次
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence讀者反饋
書目名稱Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 青春期 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:29 作者: Analogy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:39 作者: 祖?zhèn)?nbsp; 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:04 作者: 尊敬 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:35 作者: 泥沼 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:54
Argumentation for Decision Makingt the preferences of the decision maker. This agent is assumed to behave in a . way [29] amgoud-woold, at least in the sense that his decisions should be as much as possible consistent with his preferences.作者: ESPY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:12
ntation in Artificial Intelligence.A progressive developmentArgumentation is all around us. Letters to the Editor often make points of cons- tency, and “Why” is one of the most frequent questions in language, asking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the rece作者: 柳樹；枯黃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:05 作者: Magnitude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 02:11
Experimental Methods of Shock Wave Researcherred extensions establishes that its claim must be accepted as true, and membership of at least one preferred extension shows that the claim is at least tenable. In consequence, that admissible sets of arguments are conflict free is an important requirement under all the various semantics.作者: Crayon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:15
Rengarajan Sriram,Gopalan Jagadeeshack another argument, but it can also support another one. This suggests a notion of bipolarity, .. the existence of two independent kinds of information which have a diametrically opposed nature and which represent repellent forces.作者: FLOAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:05 作者: GEST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:01
Henry Pigot,Kristian Soltesz,Stig Steenmming [9, 7], with its dialectical interpretation of the acceptability of negation-as-failure assumptions based on the notion of “no-evidence-to-the-contrary” [9, 7], by the Kakas, Kowalski and Toni interpretation of the preferred extension semantics in argumentation-theoretic terms [24, 25], and by Dung’s abstract argumentation (AA) [6, 8].作者: –FER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3846-0ds. —by a nice numerological coincidence—1958) continues to grow (see [7] and the special issue of . 2005; Vol. 19, No. 3). Also the field of Artificial Intelligence has discovered Toulmin’s work. Especially four of Toulmin’s themes have found follow-up in Artificial Intelligence.作者: Adjourn 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 22:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8597-5or their argumentative goals to be achieved. What we mean by arguing strategically is that instead of making arbitrary arguments, an agent would carefully choose its argumentative moves in order to further its own objectives.作者: Dorsal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:04
Argumentation Theory: A Very Short Introduction,alled fallacies, and the logic textbooks have for over 2000 years tried to help students to identify these fallacies, and to deal with them when they are encountered. The problem was that deductive logic did not seem to be much use for this purpose, and there seemed to be no other obvious formal structure that could usefully be applied to them.作者: visceral-fat 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:35
Abstract Argumentation and Valueserred extensions establishes that its claim must be accepted as true, and membership of at least one preferred extension shows that the claim is at least tenable. In consequence, that admissible sets of arguments are conflict free is an important requirement under all the various semantics.作者: 飛行員 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:43
Bipolar abstract argumentation systemsack another argument, but it can also support another one. This suggests a notion of bipolarity, .. the existence of two independent kinds of information which have a diametrically opposed nature and which represent repellent forces.作者: 粗俗人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:13 作者: Assemble 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:30 作者: extinguish 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:49
The Toulmin Argument Model in Artificial Intelligenceds. —by a nice numerological coincidence—1958) continues to grow (see [7] and the special issue of . 2005; Vol. 19, No. 3). Also the field of Artificial Intelligence has discovered Toulmin’s work. Especially four of Toulmin’s themes have found follow-up in Artificial Intelligence.作者: 使服水土 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 03:47
Argumentation and Game Theoryor their argumentative goals to be achieved. What we mean by arguing strategically is that instead of making arbitrary arguments, an agent would carefully choose its argumentative moves in order to further its own objectives.作者: collagenase 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:09
Book 2009sking for r- sons behind behaviour. And argumentation is more than ‘reasoning’ in the recesses of single minds, since it crucially involves interaction. It cements the coordinated social behaviour that has allowed us, in small bands of not particularly physically impressive primates, to dominate the作者: 設(shè)施 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:21 作者: 拋物線 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:32 作者: 罐里有戒指 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:32
disputation, in Greek Ant- uity, but also in India and China. And logicians like me would like to return to this broader agenda of rational agency and intelligent interaction. Of course, Aristotle also gave us 978-1-4899-8427-2978-0-387-98197-0作者: BROOK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 03:59 作者: extract 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:20
Experimental Methods in Hydraulic Researchrrect, by some appropriate standard of proof, by examining the errors of reasoning we make when we try to use arguments. These errors have long been called fallacies, and the logic textbooks have for over 2000 years tried to help students to identify these fallacies, and to deal with them when they 作者: 逃避責(zé)任 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:27 作者: 積云 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:40
Rengarajan Sriram,Gopalan Jagadeeshcent studies on argumentation [23, 34, 35, 4] have shown that another kind of interaction may exist between the arguments. Indeed, an argument can attack another argument, but it can also support another one. This suggests a notion of bipolarity, .. the existence of two independent kinds of informat作者: Prostaglandins 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 18:24 作者: FLIC 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:20 作者: Arable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:28
Experimental Methods of Shock Wave Researchn constructing and comparing deductive arguments. These are arguments that involve some premises (which we refer to as the support of the argument) and a conclusion (which we refer to as the claim of the argument) such that the support deductively entails the claim.作者: 一回合 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:36
Seun Imani,Roslyn Wallace,Yassine Sassid still is fruitful in both directions: Some argumentation formalisms were used to define semantics for logic programming and also logic programming was used for providing an underlying representational language for non-abstract argumentation formalisms.作者: Encephalitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:56 作者: 手工藝品 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:06 作者: 大看臺(tái) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3846-0nting of the reception of his book), it has become a classical text on argumentation, and the number of references to the book (when writing these words. —by a nice numerological coincidence—1958) continues to grow (see [7] and the special issue of . 2005; Vol. 19, No. 3). Also the field of Artifici作者: ANNUL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 01:02 作者: 一加就噴出 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 02:16 作者: modest 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:17
Przemek A. Gorski,Changwon Kho,Jae Gyun Ohcomputer scientists for a long time. Any decision problem amounts to selecting the “best” or sufficiently “good” action(s) that are feasible among different alternatives, given some available information about the current state of the world and the consequences of potential actions. Available inform作者: 反話 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 11:55 作者: 龍蝦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0Bayesian network; agents; argument visualization; argumentation; argumentation-supported systems; artific作者: vascular 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:34 作者: Feigned 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:50
Proof Theories and Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Frameworkscs. The main focus of this chapter is on more procedural, proof-theoretic and algorithmic aspects of argumentation. In particular, Chapter 11 describes properties of extensions of a Dung argumentation framework.作者: 象形文字 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:35
Argumentation Based on Classical Logicn constructing and comparing deductive arguments. These are arguments that involve some premises (which we refer to as the support of the argument) and a conclusion (which we refer to as the claim of the argument) such that the support deductively entails the claim.作者: 腫塊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 10:39
Argument-based Logic Programmingd still is fruitful in both directions: Some argumentation formalisms were used to define semantics for logic programming and also logic programming was used for providing an underlying representational language for non-abstract argumentation formalisms.作者: 吝嗇性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 12:04 作者: 有抱負(fù)者 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:20 作者: PURG 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:24
Semantics of Abstract Argument SystemsAn ., as introduced in a seminal paper by Dung [13], is simply a pair作者: 切掉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:40 作者: 高度 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 04:49 作者: Constrain 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 12:11 作者: 隱語 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 14:02
Experimental Methods of Shock Wave Researchcs. The main focus of this chapter is on more procedural, proof-theoretic and algorithmic aspects of argumentation. In particular, Chapter 11 describes properties of extensions of a Dung argumentation framework.作者: overwrought 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 18:54
Experimental Methods of Shock Wave Researchn constructing and comparing deductive arguments. These are arguments that involve some premises (which we refer to as the support of the argument) and a conclusion (which we refer to as the claim of the argument) such that the support deductively entails the claim.作者: 畸形 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 20:52
Seun Imani,Roslyn Wallace,Yassine Sassid still is fruitful in both directions: Some argumentation formalisms were used to define semantics for logic programming and also logic programming was used for providing an underlying representational language for non-abstract argumentation formalisms.作者: mighty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 01:06 作者: Bricklayer 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 07:50 作者: originality 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 09:10
