標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Annals of Theoretical Psychology; Volume 3 K. B. Madsen,Leendert P. Mos Book 1985 Plenum Press, New York 1985 Theoretical Psychology.develo [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: cucumber 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 20:03
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology被引頻次
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology年度引用
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology讀者反饋
書目名稱Annals of Theoretical Psychology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: padding 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 21:26 作者: CLAMP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 02:23
Education, Globalization and the Nationdiscipline or, rather, as an application of .. We must therefore define metascience and also relate metatheory and theoretical psychology to the more general concept, metascience. That is the subject of the first section of this introductory paper; the second section will present a systematic summary of the papers in this volume.作者: 急性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04013-9 is truly mentalism is a matter I shall take up below. I think that behaviorism, at least in the strong sense, has also very largely disappeared from the academic scene, although behavioristic . of course remain useful in both basic and applied research.作者: 人充滿活力 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-27624-3 metatheoretician. Maybe the best thing I can do is to try to translate some of Lesche’s most central concepts into a less esoteric and less lapidary language than the one he has used, to point to some of his arguments which I find irrefutable, and finally to make some critical remarks on parts of his reasoning which I find difficult to follow.作者: 辯論的終結(jié) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:00
n the integration of theory and research and evaluates theoretical progress and advanced research. Continuing with the successful format of previous volumes in .Annals of Theoretical Psychology., Volume 10 presents four major contributions--each accompanied by commentaries and replies to commentarie作者: TIGER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:04
Psychological Metatheory,discipline or, rather, as an application of .. We must therefore define metascience and also relate metatheory and theoretical psychology to the more general concept, metascience. That is the subject of the first section of this introductory paper; the second section will present a systematic summary of the papers in this volume.作者: 污穢 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:14
On Being Brainy, is truly mentalism is a matter I shall take up below. I think that behaviorism, at least in the strong sense, has also very largely disappeared from the academic scene, although behavioristic . of course remain useful in both basic and applied research.作者: 細(xì)胞 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 03:10 作者: wall-stress 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 06:03 作者: Reservation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 13:10 作者: 事與愿違 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:17 作者: Colonnade 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:34 作者: 過份艷麗 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:09 作者: amputation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:26
Theory, Metatheory, and Weltanschauung,nthusiasm. The distinction between strong and weak theories appears to me to be a valuable one, and Eysenck’s emphasis on the utility and importance of weak theories is timely and right on target. During the last decade the Popperian picture of science has become widely known and quite influential i作者: ovation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:03 作者: 減震 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:07
From Mindless Neuroscience and Brainless Psychology to Neuropsychology,r eschewing most of the problems that traditional psychology posed but left unsolved. Two kinds of mentalism are distinguished: traditional and cognitivist (or information-theoretic). Both are found wanting for ignoring the nervous system and begging the question, since they postulate the mind inste作者: 外觀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 16:17
On Being Brainy,he majority of academic psychologists would not identify with any of them. Mentalism, at least in the sense that Bunge calls . mentalism, has long since been relegated to the fringes of psychology, although it may well have a greater following among philosophers. Whether what Bunge calls . mentalism作者: Vital-Signs 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:22
Is Neuropsychology Something New?, In general his description of the nature and practice of science today is too clean and idealized to be plausible; in particular his distinction between the way neuropsychology is conducted as a scientific discipline, compared to other branches of contemporary psychology in this regard, will not be作者: Dorsal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 02:52 作者: 權(quán)宜之計(jì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:29 作者: 禁止,切斷 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 08:36 作者: 態(tài)度暖昧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 13:03
Is Psychoanalysis Therapeutic Technique or Scientific Research?, was not at all specifically geared to such an audience (even if the current version was indeed presented before a psychoanalytic congress). Most psychoanalysts are inclined to reject, isolate, and ignore the work of theoreticians, partly because the topics are difficult and partly because they pref作者: 盡管 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:57
Psychology and Philosophy of Science,. The scientific community gives prospective scientists a dual training: a perceptual training which makes them see reality (the object of science) in a special way (structuring) designed to make it invariant, and a methodological training which makes them formulate knowledge in a way that is accept作者: filial 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 20:58
Psychology and Philosophy of Science, a discussion commensurate to such a wide range of topics. For this reason I shall restrict myself to some brief and rather superficial remarks on three topics only: 1. reality, 2. (psychological) knowledge, and 3. communication and conceptualization.作者: Judicious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:11
The Place of Theory in a World of Facts, practical application, and it is suggested that psychology should be more interested in theories, generate theories more readily, and come to grips with the general importance of theories in scientific work. Only in this way, it is suggested, can psychology join the ranks of the properly accredited作者: Talkative 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:27
Theory, Metatheory, and Weltanschauung,l metatheories. He has mounted a compelling case for the claim that theorists in either metatheoretical tradition neglect theories in the other only at the risk of missing important generalizations and trivializing their own findings.作者: 儲(chǔ)備 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:26
The Place of Theory in a World of Facts,ue course may lead to the preparation of a book; however, the kindly welcome my efforts have received from three professional philosophers encourages me to believe that some, at least, of the major points I was trying to make may have been in the right direction.作者: 廢止 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:03 作者: 使出神 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:53 作者: 審問,審訊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 21:06
Psychology and Philosophy of Science,-deductive method in psychology, and the possibility of other forms of verification in psychology. We reject both the “received view” and the idealistic conception of the incommensurability of theories.作者: 概觀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8700-7 practical application, and it is suggested that psychology should be more interested in theories, generate theories more readily, and come to grips with the general importance of theories in scientific work. Only in this way, it is suggested, can psychology join the ranks of the properly accredited作者: 羊齒 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:42 作者: 天賦 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 11:27 作者: Repetitions 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 17:33 作者: 防止 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:12
Walton and Responsible Citizenshipotive. By claiming that my desire to do X is the “cause” of my doing X they disregard the fact that whereas physical causes necessitate, motives incline but do not necessitate. To assert that a person has a desire to do X may make it predictable or intelligible that he or she will in fact do X. But 作者: mercenary 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 23:37
Evaluating Narrative Technology Design,-deductive method in psychology, and the possibility of other forms of verification in psychology. We reject both the “received view” and the idealistic conception of the incommensurability of theories.作者: 擦掉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:05 作者: octogenarian 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:59 作者: 無底 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:27 作者: agglomerate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 17:47 作者: adj憂郁的 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:17
The Constitutional Right to an EducationEysenck’s paper perceptively directs us to several of the most crucial issues in the assessment and improvement of contemporary psychological theory. In this comment I employ his lucid exposition of these issues to explain why a . science, like psychology, has not become a more advanced one, like physics.作者: 厭食癥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:34
“Merit” in University AdmissionsCorballi’s commentary on my paper contains the following controversial points.作者: KIN 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 05:12 作者: corpuscle 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:16
,SCéAL Design-Based Research Framework,Sanders and Rappard have presented a most thoughtful and insightful critique and integration of the relationship between psychology and the philosophy of science. In reflecting upon this work, I find myself in agreement with many of the general and specific arguments which they make.作者: 額外的事 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 13:18 作者: 平靜生活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 18:34 作者: Endemic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 22:05
The Place of Psychology in a Vacuum of Theories,Eysenck’s paper perceptively directs us to several of the most crucial issues in the assessment and improvement of contemporary psychological theory. In this comment I employ his lucid exposition of these issues to explain why a . science, like psychology, has not become a more advanced one, like physics.作者: 簡(jiǎn)潔 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 02:40 作者: parallelism 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 05:53 作者: Aura231 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 10:02 作者: 煩人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 13:09 作者: 攀登 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 19:45 作者: stress-response 時(shí)間: 2025-3-30 20:50
978-1-4612-9507-5Plenum Press, New York 1985作者: Encephalitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 03:22 作者: CANDY 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 08:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8700-7nterpreted to mean that there are no widely accepted general theories covering important areas. Psychology and other social sciences appear to suffer from the added disadvantage that not only are such theories and paradigms lacking, but professional members of these groups often regard this lack of 作者: 小步走路 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 12:11
Education, Inclusion, and Identitynthusiasm. The distinction between strong and weak theories appears to me to be a valuable one, and Eysenck’s emphasis on the utility and importance of weak theories is timely and right on target. During the last decade the Popperian picture of science has become widely known and quite influential i作者: 精美食品 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 17:00 作者: 宿醉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-31 18:53 作者: 全能 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 01:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04013-9he majority of academic psychologists would not identify with any of them. Mentalism, at least in the sense that Bunge calls . mentalism, has long since been relegated to the fringes of psychology, although it may well have a greater following among philosophers. Whether what Bunge calls . mentalism作者: 暗指 時(shí)間: 2025-4-1 05:54
The Constitutional Right to an Education In general his description of the nature and practice of science today is too clean and idealized to be plausible; in particular his distinction between the way neuropsychology is conducted as a scientific discipline, compared to other branches of contemporary psychology in this regard, will not be
