派博傳思國際中心

標題: Titlebook: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion; Kai Nielsen Book 1982 Kai Nielsen 1982 philosophy.philosophy of religion.religion [打印本頁]

作者: ANNOY 時間: 2025-3-21 18:55
書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion影響因子(影響力)

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion影響因子(影響力)學科排名

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion網(wǎng)絡公開度

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion被引頻次

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion被引頻次學科排名

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion年度引用

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion年度引用學科排名

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion讀者反饋

書目名稱An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion讀者反饋學科排名

作者: 地牢 時間: 2025-3-21 23:25
The Intelligibility of God-Talk,fs are unintelligible, incoherent, irrational or false the whole-way-of-life, centring around them, is ‘a(chǎn) house of cards’. Certain segments of it may still be seen to have a value when viewed from some other perspective, but if these primary religious beliefs are faulted, the religious . itself has

作者: 昆蟲 時間: 2025-3-22 02:20
The Challenge of Wittgenstein, the context of talking about the meaning of religious utterances is to show a rather complete lack of comprehension of their actual role in our lives. It, so the argument would run, is to treat them too much like hypotheses and to model God-talk too much on scientific discourse. A sensitive underst

作者: acheon 時間: 2025-3-22 04:55

作者: 阻礙 時間: 2025-3-22 12:12

作者: Choreography 時間: 2025-3-22 15:35
,On Fixing the Reference Range of ‘God’,annot be so easily put aside as certain fideists, and indeed as certain sceptics as well, would have it. Most importantly, there is no sound argument, providing a short way with dissenters, which shows that . religious discourse and religion itself are and can be in no conceptual disarray. No such s

作者: 發(fā)展 時間: 2025-3-22 20:41
Die endliche Fourier-Transformation,ng in accordance with its tenets, they are then being very irrational. And while in humility we should recognise that we all suffer from propensities to irrationality and perhaps in some spheres of our life cannot help being irrational, it is a propensity we should resist, for to be irrational is to do something we ought not to do.

作者: 禍害隱伏 時間: 2025-3-22 21:50
The Intelligibility of God-Talk,ng in accordance with its tenets, they are then being very irrational. And while in humility we should recognise that we all suffer from propensities to irrationality and perhaps in some spheres of our life cannot help being irrational, it is a propensity we should resist, for to be irrational is to do something we ought not to do.

作者: 流眼淚 時間: 2025-3-23 03:37

作者: 付出 時間: 2025-3-23 06:50
Bank- und finanzwirtschaftliche Abhandlungenttention to religious discourse itself which shows that we cannot intelligibly say that we believe in God without presupposing a belief that God exists. Again it was attention to our language that made it evident that the various forms of life were neither compartmentalised nor totally self-sufficient.

作者: 誘導 時間: 2025-3-23 13:11
Perplexities about Religion,tterances, but we also are concerned to discover something . religion that we can justifiably endorse. In fact, interest in the meaning of religious utterances is largely subservient to our interest in the truth or falsity of religion or religious beliefs.

作者: ZEST 時間: 2025-3-23 16:49
The Challenge of Wittgenstein,, . philosopher, can in no way legitimately criticise this whole mode of discourse or claim that it is unintelligible or incoherent, though he can, and often should, criticise what theologians or philosophers say about it. What we in effect learn from Moore and directly learn from Wittgenstein is th

作者: 形上升才刺激 時間: 2025-3-23 19:07

作者: 左右連貫 時間: 2025-3-24 00:48

作者: chastise 時間: 2025-3-24 04:32
Overview: 978-0-333-11466-7978-1-349-16959-7

作者: harmony 時間: 2025-3-24 07:37

作者: 音樂會 時間: 2025-3-24 13:50

作者: nephritis 時間: 2025-3-24 15:15
Wittgensteinian Fideism: I,ron, Coburn, Mounce and D. Z. Phillips.. Some of their contentions will serve as targets for my argumentation, for as much as I admire Wittgenstein, it seems to me that the fideistic conclusions drawn by these philosophers from his thought are often absurd. This leads me back to an inspection of their arguments and the premises in these arguments.

作者: 北極熊 時間: 2025-3-24 19:19

作者: GROWL 時間: 2025-3-24 23:44
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/155584.jpg

作者: intimate 時間: 2025-3-25 03:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16959-7philosophy; philosophy of religion; religion

作者: ADJ 時間: 2025-3-25 09:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14178-5nd unequivocally endorse — endorse because we have not found it wanting after the toughest, most nonevasive scrutiny. This is obscure talk and the wary philosopher has a right to be suspicious. Philosophers, including philosophers of religion, it is often remarked, should be concerned with meaning.

作者: 假裝是我 時間: 2025-3-25 12:22
Die endliche Fourier-Transformation,fs are unintelligible, incoherent, irrational or false the whole-way-of-life, centring around them, is ‘a(chǎn) house of cards’. Certain segments of it may still be seen to have a value when viewed from some other perspective, but if these primary religious beliefs are faulted, the religious . itself has

作者: 自負的人 時間: 2025-3-25 18:30
Die endliche Walsh-Transformation, the context of talking about the meaning of religious utterances is to show a rather complete lack of comprehension of their actual role in our lives. It, so the argument would run, is to treat them too much like hypotheses and to model God-talk too much on scientific discourse. A sensitive underst

作者: anaphylaxis 時間: 2025-3-25 20:03
Sebastian Jentsch,Torsten Birthron, Coburn, Mounce and D. Z. Phillips.. Some of their contentions will serve as targets for my argumentation, for as much as I admire Wittgenstein, it seems to me that the fideistic conclusions drawn by these philosophers from his thought are often absurd. This leads me back to an inspection of the

作者: Kaleidoscope 時間: 2025-3-26 02:02