標(biāo)題: Titlebook: An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights ; A Critique of Equali Jessika Eichler Book 2024 The Editor(s) (i [打印本頁] 作者: burgeon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:26
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 被引頻次
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 年度引用
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 讀者反饋
書目名稱An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 縫紉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:19 作者: 一再遛 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:57
and political theory.Applies a holistic lens by addressing dThis book develops a critique of the equality paradigms and principles to be found in the majority of today’s legal orders. It accompanies the reader taking her/him/x from a critique of non-discrimination and equality to the ‘opposite’ end 作者: ONYM 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:12
Introductory Remarks,ly examines. It builds bridges with leading justice theories and principles, and also places the debate into the multiplicity of legal orders, including domestic constitutionalism, regional ius commune and international law. These introductory remarks also serve to convey a broad idea of the concept作者: 討厭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 12:45 作者: Mitigate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:51
Equality Principles and Institutionalism: Judicial Spill-Overs and Dialoguesses and the construction and adherence to human rights takes place at different levels. A multiplicity of factors including the specific interpretative powers operating, their specific competences, surrounding political contexts, and regional integration play into this. Cross-jurisdictional dialogue作者: Amendment 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:01
Equality Paradigms and Contemporary Politics of Recognitiond or unrecognised groups in minority situations. More precisely, we engage with the cultural and political demands raised by minority groups which may coincide and lead to amalgamation of ‘intercultural demands’ as these concern the public sphere and institutions; others address this under the label作者: BROOK 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 22:20
Principles of Recognition: Or How to Move Forward?tation in current institutional realities but in formulating different strategies and principles as a way to juridify difference-based thinking. Five theoretical attempts are made, serving as theoretical basis for potential reconceptualization and in view of a paradigm that clearly departs from the 作者: Evacuate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:24 作者: HUMP 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 09:30
Collective Subject-Holdership, Processes and Scales of Collectivisation, it addresses different forms of collective subject-holdership, including ‘national minorities’, intergenerational rights and other emblematic categories. It further takes major steps in what could be called a ‘categorisation’ or ‘scales of’ collectivisation of group rights, by way of measurement. 作者: multiply 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:36
Concluding Thoughtsis developed in response. A dedicated interdisciplinary frame is required in turn, given that anti-discrimination law commonly remains confined to legal inquiry while recognition matters and politics of recognition limit themselves to political theory without necessarily being translated to technica作者: venous-leak 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 14:58 作者: jarring 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 18:51
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/155094.jpg作者: 使更活躍 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-16076-2ly examines. It builds bridges with leading justice theories and principles, and also places the debate into the multiplicity of legal orders, including domestic constitutionalism, regional ius commune and international law. These introductory remarks also serve to convey a broad idea of the concept作者: 內(nèi)部 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:54 作者: 返老還童 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:45
Neurophysiologische Korrelate der Rechnung,ses and the construction and adherence to human rights takes place at different levels. A multiplicity of factors including the specific interpretative powers operating, their specific competences, surrounding political contexts, and regional integration play into this. Cross-jurisdictional dialogue作者: Rustproof 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:36 作者: 設(shè)想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 14:55
Zusammenfassung und Implikationen,tation in current institutional realities but in formulating different strategies and principles as a way to juridify difference-based thinking. Five theoretical attempts are made, serving as theoretical basis for potential reconceptualization and in view of a paradigm that clearly departs from the 作者: 聽覺 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5575-9equality paradigm. In that light, the chapter juxtaposes positive discrimination and equality principles, disclosing opportunities and contradictions. First definitional attempts are made; further to this, positive discrimination is presented as a counter-balancing right, as a discourse and policy. 作者: preeclampsia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:26
Zusammenfassung und Implikationen,, it addresses different forms of collective subject-holdership, including ‘national minorities’, intergenerational rights and other emblematic categories. It further takes major steps in what could be called a ‘categorisation’ or ‘scales of’ collectivisation of group rights, by way of measurement. 作者: 丑惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:09
Neurophysiologische Korrelate der Rechnung,is developed in response. A dedicated interdisciplinary frame is required in turn, given that anti-discrimination law commonly remains confined to legal inquiry while recognition matters and politics of recognition limit themselves to political theory without necessarily being translated to technica作者: 旋轉(zhuǎn)一周 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 09:26 作者: 柳樹；枯黃 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 14:22 作者: OFF 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 17:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-16076-2sitioning of the book is being sought in terms of the academic disciplines and interdisciplinary approaches it identifies with. It is further attempted to convey a general idea of the concepts used with their theoretical implications, and those broader debates considered most relevant, including, in作者: 聯(lián)想 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:56 作者: 過于平凡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 01:10
Neurophysiologische Korrelate der Rechnung,nifestations of equality as well as their social complexity, these being addressed by Equality Bodies. Critical voices however draw our attention to their prospective politization, stressing the importance of their independence.作者: Crayon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 07:03
Rechnungsfairness als Konstrukt,e of a culturally homogenous State: the normative (the ‘ought to’ question relating to equality paradigms or differentiated treatment) and the empirical (‘on the ground realities’ of inequalities) enter a contested field of negotiation here with often contrasting portrayals of societal (in)equality.作者: Hyperlipidemia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 08:41
Zusammenfassung und Implikationen,ights such as, importantly, decision-making rights or those allowing to access justice, hence being of derivative nature. In a third theoretical attempt, termed ‘specialisation’, we are first reminded of the largely homogenising nature of (the) human rights landscape(s), building on the equality pri作者: 流動(dòng)性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:51 作者: Cosmopolitan 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:18 作者: COMA 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 00:10
Neurophysiologische Korrelate der Rechnung,it makes in bringing these fields together; thirdly, engaging with the merits of interdisciplinary work when studying equality, drawing from insights from judicial studies, theory, political science, and socio-legal inquiry; and finally, presenting systemic reflections on a possible paradigm shift i作者: Offset 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 03:06 作者: 縫紉 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 08:17 作者: 放牧 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:33 作者: Flinch 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:13
Equality Principles and Institutionalism: Judicial Spill-Overs and Dialoguesnifestations of equality as well as their social complexity, these being addressed by Equality Bodies. Critical voices however draw our attention to their prospective politization, stressing the importance of their independence.作者: 陰謀 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 20:24
Equality Paradigms and Contemporary Politics of Recognitione of a culturally homogenous State: the normative (the ‘ought to’ question relating to equality paradigms or differentiated treatment) and the empirical (‘on the ground realities’ of inequalities) enter a contested field of negotiation here with often contrasting portrayals of societal (in)equality.作者: FLOAT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:21 作者: 平靜生活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 03:11
Exploring Counterbalancing Paradigms: Positive Discrimination and Collectivisation of ‘inclusive equality’. The duty to fulfil in particular appears to correlate with substantive equality principles, further specifying and contextualising equality, often in consideration of minority situations. While international human rights law would certainly be considered as the most influen作者: Rodent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 06:50
Collective Subject-Holdership, Processes and Scales of Collectivisational standing rights. Scales of collectivisation broadly draw lines of demarcation between pro forma rights or formal equality and substantive change or genuinely inclusive rights which shall assist us in measuring the legal value of collective rights in contemporary orders comparatively. The followin作者: 背書 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 10:26 作者: PRE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:38 作者: tenuous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:01
An Interdisciplinary Journey from Non-Discrimination to Collective Rights 978-3-031-54618-1作者: Binge-Drinking 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 02:04 作者: 催眠藥 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 04:41
0937-5511 ed analysis of the knapsack problem, the (ln 4+?)-approximation for Steiner trees, and the VPN theorem. Thus, this book continues torepresent the state of the art of combinatorial optimization..978-3-662-58566-5978-3-662-56039-6Series ISSN 0937-5511 Series E-ISSN 2197-6783
