標(biāo)題: Titlebook: American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece; Uncertain Allies and Neovi M. Karakatsanis,Jonathan Swarts Book 2018 The Editor(s) (i [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: 棕櫚等 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 18:31
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece影響因子(影響力)
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece被引頻次
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece年度引用
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece年度引用學(xué)科排名
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece讀者反饋
書(shū)目名稱American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ Greece讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: constellation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 22:44 作者: HEDGE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 00:27 作者: photophobia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 08:10
American Foreign Policy Towards the Colonels‘ GreeceUncertain Allies and作者: anesthesia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:15 作者: ASTER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 16:37 作者: Certainty 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:52
Johnson, Nixon, and Athens: Changing Foreign Policy Toward the Greek Military Dictatorship, much so that the White House would come to specifically declaim constitutional progress as an important aspect of US policy and in which its ambassador to Athens would come close to playing the role of apologist for the colonels.作者: lipoatrophy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:43 作者: 傷心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:20 作者: parsimony 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:38 作者: Nuance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:36 作者: CODE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:18 作者: Fracture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 19:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06647-8 advocating for the return of democracy in Greece, but also working toward a . with a regime that the US found less than ideal, but one that was key to US and NATO strategic interests in the Eastern Mediterranean.作者: Canyon 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 01:17 作者: 高深莫測(cè) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:56 作者: 向外供接觸 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:35
Frakturen am proximalen Humerusle in fomenting and supporting the 1967 coup. It also points to other important topics yet to be fully analyzed, including the foreign policies of countries other than the US, as well as the impact of diasporic communities on shaping attitudes toward the colonels’ regime.作者: 結(jié)果 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 12:12
A ,: The US Reaction to the Greek Military Coup of 1967, advocating for the return of democracy in Greece, but also working toward a . with a regime that the US found less than ideal, but one that was key to US and NATO strategic interests in the Eastern Mediterranean.作者: 失誤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 17:10 作者: Lignans 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 20:10
US Diplomacy Within Europe and NATO on the Greek Question,ands, Denmark, and Norway) were sources of vocal opposition to any accommodation with Greece. Containing, managing, and placating this opposition became a primary task of US diplomacy in Europe, with the US arguing the paramount need for NATO unity and cohesiveness in the face of ongoing Cold War threats.作者: palpitate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 23:53
Assessing US Foreign Policy in the Junta Era,le in fomenting and supporting the 1967 coup. It also points to other important topics yet to be fully analyzed, including the foreign policies of countries other than the US, as well as the impact of diasporic communities on shaping attitudes toward the colonels’ regime.作者: HAIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:18 作者: 只有 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:26
Political Instability and Breakdown: The Historical Context,cal background of the overthrow of democracy, including the United States’ role in Greek politics in the years immediately preceding the coup. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, serious parliamentary crises, deep partisan cleavages, and pervasive political instability all contributed to an environment 作者: profligate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:57
A ,: The US Reaction to the Greek Military Coup of 1967,events of the coup, as well as how, over succeeding weeks and months, the Johnson administration attempted to arrive at a longer-term policy toward the colonels. Two main issues are addressed here: the initial US reaction to the coup and the formation of the longer-term approach the US government wo作者: 強(qiáng)壯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:20
Johnson, Nixon, and Athens: Changing Foreign Policy Toward the Greek Military Dictatorship,while maintaining a close security relationship with Greece. This chapter further illustrates the development of the United States’ two-pronged approach—one advocating for the return of democracy, on the one hand, while prioritizing the importance of Greece to US and NATO strategic interests in the 作者: 丑惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:32
Internal Divides: The White House, State Department, and the Athens Embassy, more nuanced. In this chapter, we explore the differences that emerged within the Johnson and Nixon administrations with respect to Greece. While some parts of these administrations (particularly the State Department) wished to apply more pressure on the Greek regime to democratize—both as a matter作者: 危險(xiǎn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:03
A View of the Colonels from the US Congress: Supporters and Opponents of the Greek Regime,t the seven years of dictatorial rule, both administrations were faced with the ongoing challenge of maintaining an essentially supportive attitude toward Greece for strategic reasons in the face of often strident criticism coming from members of Congress, the media, academics, and human rights orga作者: 評(píng)論性 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 06:14
US Diplomacy Within Europe and NATO on the Greek Question,olonels, they also were forced to contend with significant opposition both from certain North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies and from European public more generally. This chapter addresses the difficulties the United States faced in dealing with these challenges. While some NATO allies (作者: aviator 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 10:19
,Agency in Athens: The Greek Colonels’ Strategy Toward the US,es as largely a one-way street—with US power and influence dynamically acting on other countries that are implicitly portrayed as static, powerless, and passive. In contrast, this chapter seeks to place the active, strategic agency of the – regime at the heart of our analysis. What we argue is that,作者: calamity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:00
Assessing US Foreign Policy in the Junta Era,to fashion a working relationship with the colonels in Athens. Despite a consistent concern to promote liberalization in Greece, in the end, the Cold War security imperative of supporting a NATO ally in a strategic part of the world triumphed. However, the chapter also considers what this book has n作者: 共同給與 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:37
,Produzieren — gestern, heute, morgen,cal background of the overthrow of democracy, including the United States’ role in Greek politics in the years immediately preceding the coup. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, serious parliamentary crises, deep partisan cleavages, and pervasive political instability all contributed to an environment 作者: LAST 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06647-8events of the coup, as well as how, over succeeding weeks and months, the Johnson administration attempted to arrive at a longer-term policy toward the colonels. Two main issues are addressed here: the initial US reaction to the coup and the formation of the longer-term approach the US government wo作者: encyclopedia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 02:59
,überleben in einer turbulenten Umwelt,while maintaining a close security relationship with Greece. This chapter further illustrates the development of the United States’ two-pronged approach—one advocating for the return of democracy, on the one hand, while prioritizing the importance of Greece to US and NATO strategic interests in the 作者: 偏見(jiàn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:58 作者: Concerto 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 13:24
Frakturen am proximalen Humerust the seven years of dictatorial rule, both administrations were faced with the ongoing challenge of maintaining an essentially supportive attitude toward Greece for strategic reasons in the face of often strident criticism coming from members of Congress, the media, academics, and human rights orga作者: Intentional 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 14:51
Supracondyl?re Humerusfrakturenolonels, they also were forced to contend with significant opposition both from certain North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies and from European public more generally. This chapter addresses the difficulties the United States faced in dealing with these challenges. While some NATO allies (作者: 善變 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 18:23
Supracondyl?re Humerusfrakturenes as largely a one-way street—with US power and influence dynamically acting on other countries that are implicitly portrayed as static, powerless, and passive. In contrast, this chapter seeks to place the active, strategic agency of the – regime at the heart of our analysis. What we argue is that,作者: Immortal 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:57
Frakturen am proximalen Humerusto fashion a working relationship with the colonels in Athens. Despite a consistent concern to promote liberalization in Greece, in the end, the Cold War security imperative of supporting a NATO ally in a strategic part of the world triumphed. However, the chapter also considers what this book has n作者: 觀察 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:49 作者: Jocose 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 08:47 作者: Cardiac-Output 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:11 作者: Diverticulitis 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:13
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52318-1American Foreign Policy; foreign policy; international relations; politics; Johnson; Nixon作者: Debility 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 20:21 作者: 追蹤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 00:19
