標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic; Douglas Patterson Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limite [打印本頁] 作者: graphic 時間: 2025-3-21 16:16
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic被引頻次
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic年度引用
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic讀者反饋
書目名稱Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 小教堂 時間: 2025-3-21 21:05 作者: 星星 時間: 2025-3-22 03:53
Logical Consequence,ing fact about the literature is that pretty much nobody has bothered to follow up the article’s many references to Carnap’s . in any detail—this despite the fact that the only conception of consequence Tarski mentions is Carnap’s. I will argue that the article intends nothing more than an improveme作者: achlorhydria 時間: 2025-3-22 05:47 作者: 基因組 時間: 2025-3-22 10:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9247-6he older meaning-theoretic notions he had acquired from Kotarbiński and Le?niewski. Padoa’s method clearly should be construed in semantic terms, yet in 1934 Tarski is willing to re-use material from 1926 in which the notion of an interpretation of a term receives the same psychologistic treatment i作者: CLIFF 時間: 2025-3-22 15:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9247-6ing fact about the literature is that pretty much nobody has bothered to follow up the article’s many references to Carnap’s . in any detail—this despite the fact that the only conception of consequence Tarski mentions is Carnap’s. I will argue that the article intends nothing more than an improveme作者: 侵略主義 時間: 2025-3-22 19:22 作者: acrobat 時間: 2025-3-22 21:18 作者: 都相信我的話 時間: 2025-3-23 04:33
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367227logic; philosophy; philosophy of language; semantics作者: 整潔 時間: 2025-3-23 08:27
978-1-349-30673-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012作者: 消毒 時間: 2025-3-23 13:18 作者: incredulity 時間: 2025-3-23 15:49
Dual-Energy CT in Thoracic Imagingen mind and world, there are two simple ways in which to think of it as meaningful: in terms of its relation to the mind, or in terms of its relation to the world. One may thus conceive of meaning in terms of the expression of thought, or in terms of the representation of things. Call the two concep作者: 散步 時間: 2025-3-23 19:03 作者: 熱情的我 時間: 2025-3-23 23:29
Thomas Flohr PhD,Bernhard Schmidt PhDniewski and the closely related philosophy of language of Kotarbiński. The function of language is to convey the contents of thoughts and the meaning of a symbol is a content of a concept (in the case of “terms”, expressions in the simple type-theoretic hierarchy) or its contribution to determining 作者: dermatomyositis 時間: 2025-3-24 03:45 作者: expdient 時間: 2025-3-24 08:36 作者: 反感 時間: 2025-3-24 12:38 作者: 菊花 時間: 2025-3-24 18:17 作者: 媒介 時間: 2025-3-24 20:45 作者: 玩笑 時間: 2025-3-25 00:36
Alfred Tarski: Philosophy of Language and Logic978-0-230-36722-7Series ISSN 2634-5994 Series E-ISSN 2634-6001 作者: 打火石 時間: 2025-3-25 03:24 作者: 表狀態(tài) 時間: 2025-3-25 11:02
Intuitionistic Formalism,Tarski begins “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages” thus:作者: 發(fā)炎 時間: 2025-3-25 12:56
Introduction,en mind and world, there are two simple ways in which to think of it as meaningful: in terms of its relation to the mind, or in terms of its relation to the world. One may thus conceive of meaning in terms of the expression of thought, or in terms of the representation of things. Call the two concep作者: Cholagogue 時間: 2025-3-25 18:12 作者: 場所 時間: 2025-3-25 23:08
Semantics,niewski and the closely related philosophy of language of Kotarbiński. The function of language is to convey the contents of thoughts and the meaning of a symbol is a content of a concept (in the case of “terms”, expressions in the simple type-theoretic hierarchy) or its contribution to determining 作者: Volatile-Oils 時間: 2025-3-26 00:34
Truth,ncept of logical consequence as he understood it at the time, Tarski moved on to semantic concepts, motivated by the clash between philosophical scruples and mathematical practice with which we opened the previous chapter. Since Intuitionistic Formalism requires that an expression that expresses a s作者: 吹牛需要藝術(shù) 時間: 2025-3-26 04:55
Indefinability and Inconsistency,([Hodges, 2008, 120–6]) and merely polished for the 1931 submission of the Polish original of the work. (Cf. Tarski’s own “Historical Note” where the addition of the G?delian treatment of indefinability is described as, of all the results in the work “the only one subsequently added to the otherwise作者: BOOST 時間: 2025-3-26 10:31
,Transitions: 1933–1935,to avoid: truth, denotation, satisfaction and (semantic) definition. Some of the tools thereby developed were even mathematically fruitful, as shown in the later pages of ODS and its sequel, “Logical Operations and Projective Sets”, co-authored with Kuratowski. But it seems not to have occurred to T作者: 欺騙手段 時間: 2025-3-26 15:47
Logical Consequence,iar assessment that Tarski’s “account of logical truth and logical consequence does not capture, or even come close to capturing, any pretheoretic conception of the logical properties” [Etchemendy, 1990, 6]. Tarski’s conception of consequence has likewise been subject to “defenses” that either attem作者: Ischemic-Stroke 時間: 2025-3-26 20:03
Conclusion, pitched the discussion of consequence largely as a modification of Carnap’s notion of L-consequence, and he related misgivings he genuinely had about axiomatic semantics to a concern with physicalism that he probably didn’t. Like Popper, who was made “joyful” [Popper, 1974, 398] by Tarski’s views, 作者: Ingenuity 時間: 2025-3-26 23:50 作者: BOOST 時間: 2025-3-27 02:19
Kelly Branch MD, MSc, FACC,Shalin Patel MDseveral papers on axioms for the consequence relation. We will look at those works in order to see the beginning of Tarski’s project. After that we will look at his most extensive contribution to the general project, “Some Methodological Investigations on the Definability of Concepts”, which collects work from 1926 and 1932.作者: 使乳化 時間: 2025-3-27 09:12 作者: Robust 時間: 2025-3-27 13:01
Classical Dual-Feasible Functions,tory about Tarski’s development from the late 1920s up to the Paris Unity of Science conference in 1935. Now that we turn to Tarski’s remarks on the conditions under which truth cannot be defined we will be unable to ignore the issues raised by Tarski’s evolving views.作者: 心神不寧 時間: 2025-3-27 15:04 作者: 越自我 時間: 2025-3-27 20:35 作者: Odyssey 時間: 2025-3-28 01:26 作者: irreparable 時間: 2025-3-28 03:49 作者: FACET 時間: 2025-3-28 09:39
Conclusion,Carnap had already been convinced [Carnap, 1963, 60], and Kokoszyńska was also present in support of Tarski’s views. However, not everyone was enamored with “scientific semantics”. Here is Carnap’s recollection:作者: falsehood 時間: 2025-3-28 11:22 作者: 矛盾 時間: 2025-3-28 16:15
Introduction,entral to the expressive conception of language are the notions of assertion and justification since our basic notions are a subject’s saying something and their reasons for doing so; central to the representational conception are the notions of reference and truth being about things and accurately representing how they are.作者: 生意行為 時間: 2025-3-28 21:21
9樓作者: acrimony 時間: 2025-3-29 00:24
9樓作者: 面包屑 時間: 2025-3-29 06:52
10樓作者: syncope 時間: 2025-3-29 10:30
10樓作者: 令人發(fā)膩 時間: 2025-3-29 11:53
10樓作者: Amylase 時間: 2025-3-29 17:20
10樓
