標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Aiming at Truth; Nicholas Unwin Book 2007 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2007 argue.knowledge.scepticism [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Covenant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:10
書目名稱Aiming at Truth影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Aiming at Truth影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Aiming at Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度
書目名稱Aiming at Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Aiming at Truth被引頻次
書目名稱Aiming at Truth被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Aiming at Truth年度引用
書目名稱Aiming at Truth年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Aiming at Truth讀者反饋
書目名稱Aiming at Truth讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: Cantankerous 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:53 作者: 刻苦讀書 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 03:45 作者: 柔美流暢 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:34
Datenveredelung im Data-Warehouseed to do this, however, if only to assure ourselves that our version of relativism does not suffer from the serious difficulties associated, rightly or wrongly, with other versions. This is the task of this chapter.作者: Lime石灰 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 10:21
,Scepticism — and How Not to Avoid It,rectified if the concept of belief is modified in a certain way. However, before examining the ways in which our ordinary concepts can be modified, we first need to show more carefully that there really is a sceptical case to answer.作者: asthma 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 15:56
Belief and Acceptance,o do this, we need, first, to demonstrate more carefully that the concept of belief really is capable of such modification, that it is not a simple case of full-belief-or-nothing; and this means looking in more detail at rival notions such as acceptance.作者: consolidate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 18:33 作者: Ablation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 00:16
Das Data-Warehouse-Konzept im Controllingt they be kept very far apart, and that this is the desirable consequence of our answer to the sceptic. We shall also see how this apartness underlies our perspectivalism and the difference between absolute and local viewpoints.作者: 思想靈活 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 01:27 作者: 散布 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 07:16 作者: Longitude 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:02
Truth and the Norms of Assertion,n belief and acceptance is introduced, and we expound a particular kind of sceptical argument that seems to undermine the desirability of having any beliefs at all. Our solution, that our beliefs may be legitimized if they are ‘reduced’ in a special sort of way, is defended, and we outline the general metaphysical significance of our proposals..作者: 可互換 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 16:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99372-4inely believing that something is the case with merely hoping that it is, and who are too stupid or lazy to try to reform their various prejudices; but we typically suppose that we ought not to do likewise. Rather, we should aim at truth.作者: 牽索 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:12
Multidimensionale Datenstrukturenn belief and acceptance is introduced, and we expound a particular kind of sceptical argument that seems to undermine the desirability of having any beliefs at all. Our solution, that our beliefs may be legitimized if they are ‘reduced’ in a special sort of way, is defended, and we outline the general metaphysical significance of our proposals..作者: 厭倦嗎你 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 00:37 作者: 高射炮 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 02:38 作者: 顯而易見(jiàn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 07:36 作者: granite 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:53 作者: assent 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:44 作者: Accede 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:39 作者: Soliloquy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 01:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13657-6 notion of belief in a certain kind of way. But how far should we weaken it? Our sceptical argument sets an upper limit to how strong our revised notion can be; but we also need to establish a lower limit, and ask what would go wrong if our belief-substitutes were to fall below it. The most obvious 作者: ADOPT 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 05:31
Datenveredelung im Data-Warehouse We argued in Chapter 5 that this challenge can be met, but we did not explore the relativist implications that apparently follow in any detail. We need to do this, however, if only to assure ourselves that our version of relativism does not suffer from the serious difficulties associated, rightly o作者: radiograph 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 07:56 作者: AUGER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 12:33 作者: FIR 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 18:17
Belief and Knowledge, A radically new conception of knowledge — an ‘ecological model’ — will be presented and defended, one which does not logically imply the truth of what is known. We shall also see how this model can give us adequate epistemic justification as a result of a modified kind of transcendental argument.作者: Conserve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 22:33
a belief if we deal with radical scepticism without surrendering to idealism? This book defends a radically new ‘ecological‘ model of knowledge, examining what might happen if we abandoned genuine belief.978-1-349-35307-1978-0-230-62490-0作者: Ancestor 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 04:13 作者: ABIDE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:03
Book 2007This book argues that it is not obvious what we means by saying our beliefs and assertions are ‘truth-directed‘. Do we weaken our notion of a belief if we deal with radical scepticism without surrendering to idealism? This book defends a radically new ‘ecological‘ model of knowledge, examining what might happen if we abandoned genuine belief.作者: 發(fā)微光 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 09:33 作者: 遭遇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 14:27 作者: flamboyant 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 20:51
Harry Mucksch,Wolfgang Behme (Projektleiter)ny of the radical alternatives suggested in the previous chapter, since they require massive adjustment at all levels. However, the possibility remains that a creature with a different cognitive constitution could find such an alternative system more congenial than the standard version. We have alre作者: Infelicity 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 22:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13657-6justify this assumption. That is to say, we need to show that our lives really would be impoverished if we were to replace all or most of our beliefs by mere pragmatic acceptances. This will prove to be a subtler and more difficult task than might be expected.作者: alabaster 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 04:57
Cognitive Contingency,ny of the radical alternatives suggested in the previous chapter, since they require massive adjustment at all levels. However, the possibility remains that a creature with a different cognitive constitution could find such an alternative system more congenial than the standard version. We have alre作者: Regurgitation 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 05:34
Pragmatism and the Value of Truth,justify this assumption. That is to say, we need to show that our lives really would be impoverished if we were to replace all or most of our beliefs by mere pragmatic acceptances. This will prove to be a subtler and more difficult task than might be expected.作者: 信條 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 10:50 作者: Irremediable 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:59 作者: 開(kāi)頭 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 21:04
,Scepticism — and How Not to Avoid It,ified in believing anything empirical if belief is understood to aim at truth in a strong extensional sense; but claim also that the situation can be rectified if the concept of belief is modified in a certain way. However, before examining the ways in which our ordinary concepts can be modified, we作者: 發(fā)源 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 00:20 作者: 符合你規(guī)定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 04:02 作者: podiatrist 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 07:56 作者: Forehead-Lift 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:26 作者: 可卡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:44 作者: DEI 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 22:34
Mind, World and Realism,to develop the latter more fully. In so far as they promise to be both realist and relativist, they are evidently going to be unusual. Nevertheless, they will turn out to be very attractive in many ways; indeed, the fact that we are able to sustain a naturalistic realism despite drawing heavily on a作者: Esalate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 01:57
