標(biāo)題: Titlebook: Agroecology Now!; Transformations Towa Colin Ray Anderson,Janneke Bruil,Michel Patrick Pi Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2021 The Author(s) 2021 Agroecology. [打印本頁(yè)] 作者: Forestall 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:59
書目名稱Agroecology Now!影響因子(影響力)
書目名稱Agroecology Now!影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Agroecology Now!網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度
書目名稱Agroecology Now!網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Agroecology Now!被引頻次
書目名稱Agroecology Now!被引頻次學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Agroecology Now!年度引用
書目名稱Agroecology Now!年度引用學(xué)科排名
書目名稱Agroecology Now!讀者反饋
書目名稱Agroecology Now!讀者反饋學(xué)科排名
作者: 柱廊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:02
ablefood system. This book will be a valuable resource to researchers, students, policy makers and professionals across multidisciplinary areas including in the fields of food politics, international developmen978-3-030-61315-0作者: cloture 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:24
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2021tial of agroecology as a sustainable and socially just alternative to today’s dominant food regime. Agroecology is an ecological approach to farming that addresses climate change and biodiversity loss while contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals. Agroecology transformations represent a ch作者: largesse 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 05:22
Zugeordnete Normalprojektionen,trast, agroecological transformation of agri-food systems are enabled by (v) processes that . and . agroecology to develop on its own terms and (vi) . agroecology from its disabling context by dismantling elements of the dominant regime and . of agroecology within and between territories, and at different scales.作者: 歡樂東方 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 09:00 作者: TRACE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 14:07
deepening democracy for agroecology transformations.CritiqueThis open access book develops a framework for advancing agroecology transformations focusing on power, politics and governance. It explores the potential of agroecology as a sustainable and socially just alternative to today’s dominant foo作者: interrogate 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 17:58 作者: Override 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 21:12
Spezielle pathologische Anatomieiodiversity, nutrition, climate change and enhancing social relations. We then outline our approach to agroecology which is rooted in the tradition of political ecology that posits power and governance have always been the decisive factors in shaping agricultural and other ‘human’ systems.作者: COLON 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 04:32
Introduction,ical fix’ that calls to tweak the existing system. It is rather a framework for transformation that can be adopted in pursuit of a more just and sustainable food system. The chapter describes the origin of the book and provides a roadmap to help the reader navigate the flow of the manuscript.作者: constitute 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 08:23 作者: 壕溝 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 12:17
Dirk Haller,Gabriele H?rmannspergertransformation, which represent discrete areas where the conflict between agroecology and the dominant food regime manifests and where the potential for collective and transformation is transformation is most potent.作者: 偶然 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 15:06
A. Schulte-Bockholt,O. Schr?der,T. R. Kochl ecosystems increase vulnerability, hunger and poverty and undermine agroecology. Insecure rights and access to nature provides little incentive for farmers, communities and territorial networks to invest in long-term agroecological approaches.作者: 無(wú)辜 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 20:54
Anatomie, Entwicklung und Fehlbildungennd traditional knowledge is important in agroecology transformations. Unfortunately, mainstream knowledge systems often disable agroecology because they privilege outside and top-down processes of knowledge transfer that invalidate local, farmer and indigenous knowledges.作者: 變化無(wú)常 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:09 作者: 闡釋 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 03:03
Wolfgang F. Caspary,Jürgen Steinsabling dimension of this domain is the compartmentalization of networks (e.g. by commodity group), which is a contradiction to the holism of agroecology. Perhaps most challenging is the growing individualization of society that is creating a growing barrier to cooperativism.作者: 假 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 08:34 作者: 正論 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 13:47 作者: arcane 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 18:39 作者: TOM 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 19:43
Conceptualizing Processes of Agroecological Transformations: From Scaling to Transition to Transformtransformation, which represent discrete areas where the conflict between agroecology and the dominant food regime manifests and where the potential for collective and transformation is transformation is most potent.作者: MODE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:28 作者: 楓樹 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:24
Domain B: Knowledge and Culturend traditional knowledge is important in agroecology transformations. Unfortunately, mainstream knowledge systems often disable agroecology because they privilege outside and top-down processes of knowledge transfer that invalidate local, farmer and indigenous knowledges.作者: LATER 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 10:48
Domain C: Systems of Economic Exchangeciprocity in territories. Nested markets value the ecological, social, economic and political functions and outputs of agroecology and support the development of trust-based networks. Regrettably, mainstream food markets favour large volumes and standardization and exclude most agroecological producers.作者: 調(diào)色板 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:30 作者: 憎惡 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:15 作者: 熱心 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 21:09 作者: Musket 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 00:39
Reflexive Participatory Governance for Agroecological Transformations of representative democracy that prevail in conventional policy-making. Finally, we articulate the territorial approach to governance which is increasingly seen as the decisive level in fostering agroecological transformations and the scale where reflexive and participatory governance can be effectively implemented.作者: 根除 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 05:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01517-9aptive approach. It also underpins the importance of collective action, social movements and solidarity networks as a means of building and amplifying political power and community agency to advance agroecology transformations.作者: 確定 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 11:30 作者: 散布 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 16:13 作者: 枕墊 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 17:22
Origins, Benefits and the Political Basis of Agroecologyal practice throughout the world. We provide a brief review of the evidence of the benefits of agroecology in relation to productivity, livelihoods, biodiversity, nutrition, climate change and enhancing social relations. We then outline our approach to agroecology which is rooted in the tradition of作者: 并排上下 時(shí)間: 2025-3-26 23:00 作者: 圣人 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 01:26 作者: FUME 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 06:01
Domain B: Knowledge and Cultureations. Knowledge and power are intimately linked; the questions of ‘what knowledge’ and ‘whose knowledge’ is valued are vitally important. We review the informal (outside of institutions) and formal knowledge processes that have been found to support agroecology. These affirm and enable the knowled作者: inquisitive 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 12:16 作者: predict 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 15:28
Domain D: Networkse, coordinated actions needed for agroecological transformation at different scales. Civil society-driven networks are crucial because they facilitate a kind of cooperation that cannot be generated by the market or the state. On the other hand, the absence of appropriate networks can substantially l作者: Finasteride 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 19:07 作者: Analogy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-27 22:48 作者: FUSE 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 05:43 作者: 抑制 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 09:45
Reflexive Participatory Governance for Agroecological Transformations discuss governance and facilitation mechanisms that enable continuous discussions, negotiations, exchange and joint planning between actors. Further, we provide guidance on this ongoing and iterative social learning processes among actors that can enable and ensure governance interventions that bot作者: 言外之意 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 13:05
Conclusionquity and fuel the erosion of the ecological basis of the world, the urgent need for transformative change is palpable. Agroecology responds to this call for change. Our formulation of agroecological transformation reflects not one grand theory of change but a recognition of a co-evolutionary and ad作者: 防水 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 16:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61315-0Agroecology; food security; food sovreignty; sustainable food; sustainability transitions; agroecology tr作者: graphy 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 21:09
Colin Ray Anderson,Janneke Bruil,Michel Patrick PiDevelops a framework for understanding and advancing agroecology transformations.Argues for the importance of bottom up food governance and deepening democracy for agroecology transformations.Critique作者: 消極詞匯 時(shí)間: 2025-3-28 23:57 作者: 形上升才刺激 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 03:07 作者: 溝通 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 09:25 作者: optic-nerve 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 15:16
Dirk Haller,Gabriele H?rmannspergerytical frameworks that consider not only the farm level but rather whole food system transformations. We then introduce the multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions which we adopt for the purpose of this book. Moving beyond the technical analysis often found in research on sustainabilit作者: 暫時(shí)別動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 16:22
A. Schulte-Bockholt,O. Schr?der,T. R. Kochlements of natural ecosystems, agroecology specifically, and the sustainable livelihoods of food producers more generally, will be impossible. We review how the access and control over water, ecosystem, cultivated biodiversity, seeds, breeds and soil amongst other aspects of nature enable agroecolog作者: 錯(cuò)誤 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 20:01 作者: 宴會(huì) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-29 23:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59960-6ural products move from producers to various users and by which agri-food producers acquire inputs that cannot be produced on the farm. We review the importance of traditional systems of exchange (such as informal markets and barter systems), subsistence (or family and community self-provisioning) a
