派博傳思國(guó)際中心

標(biāo)題: Titlebook: A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor; Relevance Theory and Markus Tendahl Book 2009 Markus Tendahl 2009 cognitive linguistics.future.knowledge.lingu [打印本頁(yè)]

作者: Dopamine 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 17:16
書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor影響因子(影響力)

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor被引頻次

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor被引頻次學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor年度引用

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor年度引用學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor讀者反饋

書(shū)目名稱A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

作者: FOIL 時(shí)間: 2025-3-21 23:07

作者: 不規(guī)則的跳動(dòng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 04:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xider this situation unfortunate, because relevance theory, as a cognitive pragmatic view on language and communication, can make very important and unique contributions to the study of metaphor. I will start this chapter by first giving a very brief overview of Gricean pragmatics, because although r

作者: Mechanics 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 06:22

作者: Aggrandize 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 11:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xproaches to metaphor see metaphor as a form of language that is characterized by deviance from a literal standard, both relevance theory and cognitive linguistics do not support this position and view metaphor as a ubiquitous part of both ordinary language use and everyday cognition.

作者: 蘑菇 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 13:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-X In this chapter, I want to gather together the results deriving from these discussions. The outcome of this will be a hybrid theory of metaphor that is significantly influenced by relevance theory and cognitive linguistics, but in which I will also make original contributions which cannot be found

作者: thalamus 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 19:05

作者: 龍卷風(fēng) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-22 23:54
Book 2009A provoking new approach to how we understand metaphors thoroughly comparing and contrasting the claims made by relevance theorists and cognitive linguists. The resulting hybrid theory shows the complementarity of many positions as well as the need and possibility of achieving a broader and more realistic theory of our understanding.

作者: 祖?zhèn)?nbsp; 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:15
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244313cognitive linguistics; future; knowledge; linguistics; linguists; metaphor; understanding; literary diction

作者: biosphere 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 05:35

作者: febrile 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 10:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xproaches to metaphor see metaphor as a form of language that is characterized by deviance from a literal standard, both relevance theory and cognitive linguistics do not support this position and view metaphor as a ubiquitous part of both ordinary language use and everyday cognition.

作者: Hyperlipidemia 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 17:18
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/141270.jpg

作者: Monolithic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 21:17

作者: antidote 時(shí)間: 2025-3-23 23:57

作者: Cabg318 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 04:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xit has not always been easy to reconcile these theoretical frameworks with each other. However, I hope that I have successfully demonstrated that there is a huge potential in working on topics in a non-dogmatic way rather than staying within the confines of a single framework.

作者: chalice 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 06:48

作者: 江湖騙子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 10:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xin either of the theories. Such a hybrid theory seems to be especially valuable as it has become obvious that metaphor scholars struggle with the deficiencies of each theory, and some begin to understand that both perspectives have something very important to contribute towards a comprehensive, cognitive theory of metaphor.

作者: 匍匐前進(jìn) 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 15:00

作者: 騙子 時(shí)間: 2025-3-24 22:55
Cognitive Linguistics and Metaphor,ichte nicht nur ge- macht, sondern erz?hlt, umgeschrieben und erweitert. Zwi- schen uns und anderen ist Raum, einander zu verstehen und uns aufeinander im Kontext einer gemeinsamen Geschichte zu beziehen. Das erm?glicht ein Verstehen von Schuld aber auch von Wiedergutmachung und Vers?hnung. In diese

作者: Cognizance 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 00:27

作者: engagement 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 06:41
The Hybrid Theory of Metaphor,Krise? bezeichnet (Frevert et al. 2008). Durch die innerpsychische Bearbeitung der Themen dieser übergangsphase entsteht elterliche Identit?t , und die zu Eltern gewordenen Partner erleben Selbstwirksamkeit: Sie fi nden eine neue Rolle. Wie alle Krisen schaff t auch diese Herausforderung die M?glich

作者: 江湖郎中 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 11:34
Conclusion and Future Challenges,ie von S?uglingen und Kleinkindern (0-3 Jahre).Praxisorienti.Das umfassende Handbuch zur Beratung und Psychotherapie: 0-3 Jahre: .Dieses Buch versammelt die renommierten deutschsprachigen Experten auf dem Gebiet. Durch die Ausweitung auf Kleinkinder wird der Bereich der frühen Kindheit von 0 bis 3 J

作者: Licentious 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 15:06
Cognitive Linguistics and Metaphor,r- wiegen einer einzigen Position fuhrt zu einem pathologischen Erscheinungsbild. Da? die vorsymbolische Ebene nicht ein- fach überwunden werden darf, wenn man nicht Sinnlichkeit im weiten Sinne opfer978-3-7091-6790-8

作者: elastic 時(shí)間: 2025-3-25 16:49